A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, May 8, 2017
May Day mayday
by Sanjana Hattotuwa-May 7, 2017, 10:55 am
It was truly a Kafkaesque experience. I have for nearly 20 years gone to
Sleek Salon on Vajira Road. On the Friday before May Day, as I was
getting a haircut, a fellow customer received two calls and made one.
There was no attempt whatsoever to leave the men’s salon to take the
calls, or to conduct the conversations in a hushed tone. The first call
was a negotiation over extra buses to cart people to a rally on May Day.
The political party making the request wasn’t clear. Evident, just by
listening to the responses, was that a significant premium on offer if
the buses were supplied. The caller was told, apologetically, there were
no more buses available, at whatever price. The second call had the
recipient repeatedly state his official designation and where he was,
which to the caller was at an important meeting. The import of this
blatant falsehood was only evident in the third call, which he made to
his legal counsel. On this call, all of us in the room were privy to the
news that an open warrant had been issued for his arrest, and that the
Police were in his office awaiting his return. According to what he
informed his lawyer, it was around the non-payment of a large bill for
which he apparently bore no responsibility.
An official clearly holding an important government position, with
impunity, loudly speaking in public as a broker for public transport
used for partisan purposes, apparently wanted by the Police over
financial anomalies, calls a lawyer to keep him from going to prison,
all the while calmly seated getting a haircut, and at one point asking
the barber to jot down the mobile number of the Police constable waiting
to arrest him. Save for furtive glances reflected through mirrors and
cocked eyebrows, the rest of us in the room didn’t know how to react.
The whole episode was a snapshot of Sri Lanka today – where the
positively bizarre exists cheek by jowl with the ordinary, and where the
lack of shame over serious allegations or even the threat of arrest is
the norm for those with clear political clout or are proxies to power.
As it would have to others present in the room, it reminded me of what
things were like under the Rajapaksa regime and what Asanga Welikala, an
academic and friend, calls the ‘normalisation of the exception’, a
disturbing socio-political condition where what is ethically suspect or
essentially wrong and violent in form, substance, spirit or
implementation, nevertheless garners popular support over time by
appearing to be the usual way of going about business, or conducting
governance.
And this is how we went
into May Day
Most May Day rallies now resemble rock concerts. Guest appearances,
sound bytes, music, song and dance before and after the main stage
appearance of some pretentious individual – beyond the reach of even
those attending – live streamed, plastered across social media and this
year, captured through drones as well. A leading journalist vented, not
incorrectly, that May Day is more about the genuflection towards select
individuals heading political parties than anything remotely related to
highlighting the rights and struggles of workers. Not that the crowds
seem to care – out of coercion, curiosity or some coordination – they
come in droves, sometimes, as was the case on Galle Face this year, even
to die. It is unclear whether they listen to what is said on the main
stage, or care enough to. Those on the main stage clearly don’t care
about anything they say they do – if they did, at the very least and on
May Day, they too would come in buses and trains, not luxury SUVs. The
fiction around rally, congregation, stage, speech, intoxication and
subsequent dispersion is a well-known, rehearsed script.
But beyond public theatre, May Day is also anchored to the projection of
power and the perception of popularity. This completely pointless
contest between political parties is nevertheless an inescapable, annual
litmus test, outside uncertain timelines of elections. All leading
politicians and political parties plan for May Day as a show of
strength. And this year, the Joint Opposition’s rally at Galle Face
green put the others to shame. Judge the success of it not by what the
JO says, but the degree to which those in government, and in power, go
to downplay it.
On social media, one young card-carrying UNP supporter tried to suggest
that the area in front of the main stage had only ten thousand seats.
Even a cursory glance at any photo suggests a density, in that area
alone, of at least three to four times more. Other attempts appeared to
be more scientific, but were in fact anything but – blocking out grids
in the crowd and suggesting each grid had one hundred people, a patently
absurd under-estimation.
Lest we forget, the power of optics is more than just the number of
people who attend a rally. It is about how the rally is covered and from
what angles. Here too, the JO was ahead through better, more strategic
planning. From the time the crowd was coming into Galle Face green, with
video footage put on social media by Namal Rajapaksa, and taken from
what appears to be the rooftop of the Taj Samudra hotel, to the
perspectives afforded by drones, the live coverage as well as carefully
selected photos released to the public gave a sense of scale. In
comparison, what is to date publicly available on the social media
accounts of the President and Prime Minister focus on a few individuals,
and less on the (smaller) crowds that came to their rallies. And even
here, as any novice photographer worth his/her salt will attest, angles
matter. There is simply no spatial awareness in the government’s
official output, no sense of scale, perspective, a framing that conveys
numbers or the use of vantage points to communicate the length of a
procession, or the breadth of a crowd.
If May Day is essentially a contest fought around the projection of
popular support through media, as much as if not more than actual feet
on the ground, the JO came out on top. And this is a vicious cycle. How
crowds are enticed to participate is well-known – few ever come out of
their own desire. And yet, this is beside the point. The photos of the
JO rally carry a currency the government cannot easily or effectively
match, which when coupled with debilitating strikes in the near future,
strengthens a perception that the government is haemorrhaging the
popular vote. The JO only has to show this in order to sow uncertainty,
fear and doubt in the minds of citizens, business, investors and
diplomats. The government as a basic minimum response has to demonstrate
how much of the popular vote it retains, a task that is increasingly
difficult.
I end where I began. For far too many, May Day’s theatrics aside,
governance as a feeling and something that is experienced is
disturbingly familiar today to what so many thought was voted out in
January 2015. Intellectually, the analysis may with sound reasoning
argue that things are indeed very different. But the heart wins over the
mind. If like at Sleek Salon, hapless citizens are only ever entreated
to impunity, the abuse of power and a corrupt political culture, it is
likely they become either apathetic, angry or both - anathema to a
government in power, that hopes to retain it. It is unclear the
political leadership we have today cares enough for course correction.