A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, July 13, 2017
Dayan Jayatilleka’s Diatribe On Premadasa’s Israel Policy
I was more than amused by reading Dr. Dayan Jayatilleka’s article which is by and large an eulogy on President Premadasa’s foreign policy in relation to Israel.
Dayan makes use of my comments on the evolution of Sri Lankan foreign
policy towards Israel under successive governments ending with my short
addendum published in the Island of 10th July
2017 which he calls “a speculative caricature” as the opening gambit to
express his own views on the situation under President Premadasa. He
sees my interpretation of reasons for appointment of the Mossad
commission as gunning for Minister Gamini Dissanayake as
a (mere) local reason which he seems to be inclined to dismiss in
preference to a much vaulted interpretation of Premadasa’s understanding
of the book “By Way of Deception” by former Mossad operative Victor Ostrovsky.
Ostrovsky disclosed that Israel played a double game in Sri Lanka by
supporting the government on one hand and the Tigers on the other hand.
The situation, true or not, was not unusual with Israel. In the
Iran-Iraq war, Israel was reputed to have supported both sides despite
Iranian regime’s anti-Israeli posture, the Iranians with intelligence.
Obviously, Israel wished to see both their opponents destroyed in a
self-consuming war.
I
am not inclined to attribute such high profile thinking to President
Premadasa such as a deep understanding of Ostrovsky’s book for him to be
motivated to pursue his Israeli policy. Nor was there anyone around him
who could have translated the book’s significance to him. (My apologies
to Secretary K.H.J. Wijeyedasa). There was none in the Foreign Office I
knew of. There was, of course, Bradman Weerakoon, Presidential adviser
but I doubt if he had any role as he was appointed the Chairman of Air
Lanka with its multifarious problems. If one reads Dayan’s article
carefully, one would see him according a place to his late father, Mervyn de Silva,
outside the bureaucratic circle, in proffering advice to the President.
Mervyn was my good friend and we worked closely from the days of
Mrs.Bandaranaike on issues like non-alignment. I did not see him getting
any close to Mr. Premadasa with whom I had close rapport. (I shall
comment later on Premadasa appointing him to the FASG and report on
reforms to the Foreign Service).
Dayan
has expressed an opinion which I do not see valid enough to reject the
idea that Premadasa was motivated by local factors even if the latter
was considered another opinion. Holding on to Ostrovsky theory alone can
be flowed and incomplete in interpreting Premadasa policy on Israel.
What
was the need for Premadasa institute a second report on reforms at the
Foreign Office when he had already appointed a Committee with Bradman
Weerakoon as Chairman and W.A.P. Menikdiwela, former Secretary to the
President and Dr. Ananda Guruge as members. He engaged another Committee
presided by Ambassador N. Balasubramanium, myself, and two other senior
Foreign Service men to comment on the Bradman Committee report and to
implement what was accepted? Was Premadasa and Mervyn de Silva working
on another agenda?
In
final analysis, I have to reject Dayan’s position that it was the
understanding of Ostrovsky’s book which made President Premadasa to
appoint the Mossad Commission. Sugeeswara Senadheera, Director General
of Media Affairs at the Presidential Secretariat, in contrast to my
view, has opined that Premadasa was gunning for Minister Lalith
Athulathmudali rather than at Gamini Dissanayake through the appointment
of the Mossad Commission. I have pointed out how close Gamini was to
President J.R. Jayewardene and he was part of the President’s
negotiating team on an arms deal in Paris with Prime Minister Shimon
Peres.
Premadasa
adopting a counter strategy after the disclosure of double dealing by
Israel of sending a team headed by Ranjan Wijeratne to Iran, Iraq and
Libya to procure arms from these countries is incomplete in detail. Army
Commander Wanasinghe did not accompany this mission. It comprised
Ranjan Wijeratne, Foreign Trade Minister, A.R. Mansoor (a Muslim!) and
myself as the first resident Ambassador in Iran. I arrived a few hours
before the arrival of the other two and presented credentials to the
Iranian President just in time to join the delegation. We could not
proceed to Iraq and Libya because Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait took place
at that time. Arms negotiations which followed were carried on by a
Brigadier who sought my assistance in negotiating prices. The air craft
loads of arms which followed every month which Dayan speaks of, was a
later development following the visit of Defence Secretary Cyril
Ranatunge. There were no “monthly ” aircraft loads but only a single one
which was negotiated by me with the Iranian Defence Minister. The call
signs of this single aircraft were conveyed by me in code to General
Ranatunge at his residence at Kegalle at midnight.
As
for the formation of FASG (Foreign Affairs Study Group) under President
Premadasa with Gamini Corea as Chairman and Mervyn de Silva as Deputy
Chairman, whose report was handed over after President Premadasa’s
(untimely) death. Gamini Corea was a senior adviser to the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs from 1985 but I do not recall him in a role as Chairman
of FASG. Not while I was in the Foreign Office till 1990 before
appointment as Ambassador to Iran. I recall, however, a few people
headed by Major General Anton Mutucoomaru, former Army Commander and
Ambassador, after his retirement in 1969 forming a study group in
foreign relations along with and a few others including Mervyn de Silva.
That was during the regime of Mrs.Sirima Bandaranaike in 1970s.