A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Khurshid
says accountability must for rights violations in Sri
Lanka

PTI
New Delhi, February 27, 2013
in the wake of fresh allegations of rights violations against ethnic Tamils in Sri Lanka, India on Wednesday said there should be accountability for such issues but remained evasive on the position it will take at the UN on a resolution against that country.
External affairs minister Salman Khurshid made it clear that India would not intervene directly in Sri Lanka's sovereign affairs even as members in the Rajya Sabha expressed serious concern over the situation there and demanded an independent credible probe into the killing of LTTE chief Prabhakaran's 12-year-old son Balachandran.

PTI
New Delhi, February 27, 2013
in the wake of fresh allegations of rights violations against ethnic Tamils in Sri Lanka, India on Wednesday said there should be accountability for such issues but remained evasive on the position it will take at the UN on a resolution against that country.
External affairs minister Salman Khurshid made it clear that India would not intervene directly in Sri Lanka's sovereign affairs even as members in the Rajya Sabha expressed serious concern over the situation there and demanded an independent credible probe into the killing of LTTE chief Prabhakaran's 12-year-old son Balachandran.
DMK,
a key UPA constituent, said it has lost faith in the government on this and its
members staged a walkout along with those from AIADMK and Left, dissatisfied
with Khurshid's reply to the debate on the plight of Tamils in Sri Lanka.
"We
are totally and utterly committed to the outcome that must ensure equality,
dignity, justice for the Tamil people of Sri Lanka," Khurshid said, sharing
concerns expressed by members cutting across party lines.
On
the recent allegation about Balachandran being killed in cold blood by the Sri
Lankan forces, he said India cannot "adjudicate" about the truth behind the
incident and apportion the responsibility on anybody for the "very moving, very
tragic, very sad" incident.
"That
is why we are engaging with Sri Lanka... Accountability should be
there...Whether it should be imposed from outside or come from within...
Honestly speaking, accountability is necessary, accountability is inevitable but
accountability must come from within," the minister said.
"There
is no future unless there is reconciliation, there is no future unless there is
accountability," he said but added that India cannot impose a timeline on Sri
Lanka for it.
Responding
to demands by members that India should vote with the US resolution in the UN
against Sri Lanka on it, he said, "What point we make in the UN can't foreclose
today. We will make position keeping this debate in mind. After taking position
we will disclose here..."
As
members repeatedly sought to know the position of the Government of India on the
resolution, Khurshid said it depended upon the actions taken by Sri Lanka.
"If
Sri Lanka is able to show there is movement forward, there will be one
conclusion, if Sri Lanka is not able to show there is movement forward, there
will be another conclusion," Khurshid said during the debate.
The
debate also saw members raising demands like disallowing Sri Lankan President to
visit India and even sending Indian troops there again to check the alleged
"genocide" and "ethnic cleansing" of Tamils in that country.
As
some members including AIADMK's V Maitreyan objected to Khurshid describing Sri
Lanka as a friendly country, the minister said, "We may have differences, pain,
disappointment, anger and anguish but we should not be saying that Sri Lanka is
an enemy country. It is not."
Seeking
to allay apprehensions of Sri Lanka government trying to skirt implementing the
13th amendment of its Constitution regarding the devolution of powers to Tamils,
the minister said Indian government has been assured time and again that the
13th amendment is the foundation stone of the resolution of the Sri Lankan
problem.
"We
have been continuously and repeatedly told that there is no reason to believe
that the 13th amendment will be diluted...Within the range of diplomacy and
foreign relation affairs, we have been assured time and again that the 13th
amendment is the foundation stone for Sri Lanka," he said but acknowledged there
are different views there on it.
As
CPI's D Raja wanted a categorical assurance from Khurshid that Sri Lanka will
not ignore the 13th amendment, he said, "I cannot give assurance about what
another government will do."
The
minister said he wanted to reiterate the commitment of this House, Government
and people to see the end of hostilities and do "what can be done to compensate
for the enormous amount of suffering" the Sri Lankan Tamils underwent.
"Government
is of the view that the end of the conflict in Sri Lanka provided a unique
opportunity to pursue a lasting political settlement within the framework of a
united Sri Lanka, acceptable to all communities in Sri Lanka including Tamils,"
he said.
