The
defeat of terrorism promised much for a country that had suffered too much pain
and devastation. But to enjoy the peace dividend, it was important that steps be
taken to ensure the situation that paved the way for a 30-year war never arose.
A popular term for this is reconciliation. A more understandable aspect of this
is 'those who suffered the traumas of the war are not victimized.' This, from
the perspective of the Northern citizen, means, among other things, the right to
return to their ancestral lands, claim ownership to these lands and also restart
their livelihood.
Yet,
although nearly four years have lapsed since the North was liberated, thousands
who were forced to flee their homes and spent months in makeshift camps, are yet
to be given these rights. Significantly, these lands have either been demarcated
as coming under High Security Zones or are occupied by the military.
This
is why more than 20,000 civilians who have no access to their lands have been
compelled to stage a mass hunger strike at the Tellipalali Durga Devi Temple
premises today (15) and demand the withdrawal of the Security Forces from their
lands.
The
political significance of this action is reflected in the fact that along with
the Tamil National Alliance (TNA), has not only conveyed its support, but also
garnered the support of the recently formed joint opposition, of which it is a
coalition partner.
According
to the TNA spokespersons, civilians who were affected when they were evicted
from their original places of traditional residence, consequent to the
intensification of the war, still live in a pitiful state as their ancestral
homes and productive lands have been encroached upon by the Security
Forces.
Most
of the charges articulated by the protesters, most of who are still living in
IDP camps, are very serious and if prosecuted in any other democracy, would have
drawn very pointed reprimands on the perpetrators of these land-grabbings and
resulted in the reiteration of the fundamental right of every citizen of the
country to own property and the restoration to the eventual owners of such
properties.
Materialization
of military townships might appear as imposing monuments to the might of the
victorious military of the government, but it is no spectacle for celebration
for the inhabitants of the region.
Yet,
the odds against the protesters are far too great. The might of the Security
Forces is too daunting a force for an unarmed civilian population to fight
against.
A
hunger strike would certainly generate a different yet strong sense of
solidarity among the rest of Tamils in the area. But most significantly what we
need to understand is that hunger strikes such as what is happening today and
protests that are more or less a daily routine, are not taking place in a
vacuum. They are all happening in a living dynamic of political instability in
the country.
The
USA is threatening to embarrass the government yet again in Geneva in the
forthcoming UNHRC meeting; Navi Pillay has already issued a couched warning of
sorts about Sri Lanka's failure with fresh calls for intervention and the
Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) is posing even more ominous
problems. To add to this and the growing sense of polarization, the President is
reported to have attended an official working meeting in the North and the
leading political entity in the North, the TNA, had not been invited.
When
a hunger strike is being planned in the context of this murky political and
social backdrop and when the central issue of that strike is 'land,' which in
effect for some, is 'Eelam' for all what one means by Eelam is land, the seeds
of another protracted struggle, whether aided and abetted by the TNA or not, are
being sown. Let us hope, for the sake of the country and all its inhabitants,
the government acts sensibly and not provide nourishment to these seeds by
ignoring the concerns of the Tamils that are both relevant and
significant.