A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, April 28, 2013
Political Monks: Some Thoughts On The Kelaniya Declaration Of Independence 1947
On the eve of the grant of dominion status to
Ceylon by its colonial rulers, the British a group of Buddhist Monks took a dim
view of the ‘freedom’ that was being negotiated. They decided to craft instead a
unilateral declaration as members of the Sangha to set the record straight on
the aspirations of this island for full freedom and the true and authentic
sources of that freedom.
It
is a matter of contention whether the monks who took this step were
representative of the entire Sangha of the country. The biographers of JR
Jayawardene – KM De
Silva and Howard Wriggins take the view that they were neither
representative of the Sangha nor authorized by the Sangha to make this
declaration. This is probably the reason for this act being termed a ‘revolt in
the temple’ an expression that was used as the title of DC Vijayawardena’s book
of the same name that came out in 1953.
Among
these rebels were Ven. Walpola
Rahula, Ven Bambarende Siri Seevali, Ven Kotahene Pannakitti and
Ananda Sagara (who later disrobed and was MP for Horana from 1956-9 as Sagara
Palansuriya.
What
makes this political act significant is the readiness of these monks to speak
for the rights of all the people of this country without fear or favour. There
are still Buddhist Monks in Sri Lanka who speak this same language. We do not
know how many, but we can only hope that more and more will come to own this
declaration of high principles as a guide post and reference point in our
continuing search for political adulthood. Buddhists in the island
(conservatives and radicals) were divided over this Declaration in 1947, and
there are no short cuts today either.
The
Full Text
THE KELANIYA DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE – JANUARY 6,
1947
Hail
The declaration of the Sangha of Sri lanka
Twenty
five centuries ago, our forefathers established in Sri Lanka a state of Society,
Free, Independent and Sovereign, in order to ensure to the people security of
Life and Liberty on the one hand, and on the other the right as well as
opportunity to seek and obtain happiness. A few centuries later the Sangha, the
Treasurers of the eternal values proclaimed by the Buddha, became the Guardians
of the Life and Liberty as well as the sponsors of the Well – being and
Happiness of that Society.
Nations
and civilisations are not eternal. They rise, flourish, decay and die. Nothing
in this world can be regarded as eternal. There are values higher than cities
and nations, and our country has always stood for these values. Mere material
possessions are not the sine qua non of happiness. No measures or
quantities of these can give that essential quality of happiness which
constitutes the real dignity of mankind.
Four
and a half centuries ago, ‘disturbers of the peace of mankind’ from the West not
only challenged the right of the people of this Island to their way of life and
liberty, but also attempted to introduce into it ideals other than those for
which this country had always stood for. It is our glory that this country never
had any dearth of men inspired with the spirit of Sri Lanka. These outstanding
leaders of the nation accepted the challenge, and fierce struggles by the people
against the foreigners ensued during three whole centuries.
Thereafter
a section of the community, arrogating to themselves an authority that had not
the sanction of the will of the nation, ceded the country to the last of the
alien aggressors, who have since dominated over it to the loss of liberty and
happiness of its people. Posterity, however cannot be deprived of the inherent
rights which peoples acquire when they form themselves into a state of civilized
society, by the act or acts, or Compact, or Convention entered into by any group
of men in the near or remoter past. And the people who for 131 years have been
denied their inherent rights are not content, today, to be fettered any longer
or to remain under an alien yoke.
We,
therefore, the Sangha of Sri Lanka, the Guardians of the Life and Liberty and
Sponsors of the Well – being and Happiness of the people of this island,
assembled on this hallowed spot sanctified by the feet of the Master, do hereby
declare and publish, on behalf of the people, that Sri Lanka claims its right to
be a Free and Independent Sovereign State, that it has resolved to absolve
itself from all allegiance to any other Power, State or Crown, and that all
political connection between it and any other State is hereby dissolved; and
that as a Free and Independent Sovereign State it has full right to safeguard
its Freedom and Independence, to contract alliances and do all other acts and
things which Independent States may of right do.
For
due recognition of the rectitude of our action and for support of the claim made
under this declaration , we, the Sangha of Sri Lanka, hereby appeal to the
conscience and sense of justice of all right thinking peoples of the world. And
in hereby calling upon the good people of Sri Lanka, on whose behalf we make
this declaration, unitedly and in courage and strong endeavour to see to it that
its purpose is achieved in the fullest possible measure, we, the Sangha of Sri
Lanka, on our part, pledge ourselves to associate with them in spirit as well as
in action in that great and high resolve.
Declared
on this auspicious anniversary of the Buddha’s first visit to Sri Lanka, Monday
the Full Moon of Durutu, in the Year 2490 of the Buddhist Era in the
new Gandhakuti (Fragrant Chamber) of the Sri Kalyani Raja Maha
Vihara
[The
declaration is extracted from Revolt in the Temple authored by DC
Vijayawardhana.]
Commentary
In
voicing the collective aspiration of the nation for true independence and in
asserting values that are ‘higher than cities and nations’ this declaration is
clearly ahead of its time. It is more so today when the cancer of division has
eaten into the Sangha itself. In so far as freedom contains a spiritual
core, the Sangha, and indeed all men and women in robes in search
of the truth are united with the people of this country in their quest for
true peace and happiness.
The
Buddha taught that liberation is the essential criterion of spiritual
authenticity, not tradition or convention. The Sangha that gathered at
Kelaniya on January 6, 1947 re-affirmed this. In doing so they transcended the
traditional role of the Sangha as guardians and representatives of the
majority – Sinhala Buddhists and spoke for a single nation – perhaps yet unborn
but one which will surely materialize upon the same foundation of values
asserted by them.
This
was an act of creative disintegration – as opposed to blind conformity. For 133
years the stranglehold of the British Empire on virtually every aspect of life
inCeylonhad been total. The educated English speaking Ceylonese were faithful
British subjects for whom the constitutional, political and legal order
established by Imperial Britain represented a self evident truth. Democracy,
Rule of Law andIndependenceof the Judiciary represented modernity and the clear
way forward. No reasonable man would quarrel with these forms even though they
were fashioned in the West. For the venerable monks who gathered at Kelaniya the
point of departure was more fundamental. They referred to
“… the inherent rights which peoples acquire when they form themselves into a state of civilized society, by the act or acts, or Compact, or Convention entered into by any group of men in the near or remoter past.”
In
their view this Ancient Compact (also expressed by the term Maha
Sammata or Great Consensus) made by our ancestors
was inalienable. It follows that the transactions carried out between
the Kandyan Chiefs of 1815 and the English Educated Elite of 1948 with the
British had done nothing to disturb the continuity of this principle of freedom.
These transactions were a mere interruption in the long march of history that
the people of this island had undertaken.
Great
pressures are exerted on individuals as well as whole societies today to conform
to a particular model of politics, economics, culture and life. These pressures
can be gross as well as subtle, naked as well as disguised. To make a stand
against ‘the way things are done’ to dare to think differently and act
differently is to revolt. The key to such strength of moral character lies in
compassion or karuna, which transcends a passion for some with a
passion for all. As Krishnamurti said in his book Why are you being
educated?
That’s what you are being taught: to imitate, to conform, to fit into the pattern. And is that the end of life? Then you ask: ‘What shall we do? Is there something else? To find something totally different from all this, you have to have a great deal of intelligence. Intelligence is not knowledge. Knowledge gives you capacity, position, status, but knowledge is not love, knowledge is not compassion. It is only where there is love and compassion that there is intelligence, and that intelligence has nothing whatsoever to do with the cunning intelligence of thought.
Post
independence Sri Lanka has seen at least 4 significant revolts. These were the
revolution of 1956 and the revolution of 1977 both of which were state driven
and the anti-state revolutions of JVP and LTTE.
Enough has been written about these upheavals.
Yet
very little has been written on the peaceful revolt staged in Kelaniya in 1947.
It followed the tradition of the Buddha who was himself a gentle revolutionary
who reacted and responded to the structural injustices of his day with precision
and intelligence. The Kelaniya Declaration was an endeavour in this
direction.
Inspiring,
guiding, directing and supporting lay society towards freedom and happiness is
quintessentially the role of the true Sangha. It only remains to add in
the same breath that a Sangha which remains fettered by ties of race,
religion or caste would only struggle to perform this noble
task.

