A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, May 16, 2013
China’s Buddhist Diplomacy In Sri Lanka:What Is The Endgame With China, India, And America (CIA)?
By Patrick
Mendis -May 14, 2013 |
Summary: The strategic players of
China, India, and America (CIA) are all attempting to restore historic supremacy
and legitimacy in the Indian Ocean through Sri Lanka—as if the island’s
post-Eelam War’s peace dividends could benefit all stakeholders. Sri Lanka, the
crown jewel of China’s multibillion dollar New Silk Road—or the String of
Pearls—strategy across the Indian Ocean will be home to a $100-million plus,
all-encompassing Lotus Tower. The tower, named in deference to the Buddha’s
Lotus Sutra, is being paid for by Beijing. Cementing longstanding historical
ties as well as reaffirming the Buddhist bonds between China and Sri Lanka, the
Chinese-funded telecommunications tower is a physical manifestation of Beijing’s
foreign policy slogan of a peaceful rising. The Lotus Tower shrewdly embodies a
Buddhist emblem of peace; it also harkens back to the ancient power that once
radiated from the Middle Kingdom. The construction of the tower in Colombo comes
at a time when India and the United States have purposefully reengaged with
strategic Sri Lanka to rebalance international relations and power structure in
the region. With an extensive diplomatic and trade history, this millennia-old
island is generating a subtle but far-reaching influence on its powerful
neighbor, India, as well as both the United States and China in the new maritime
theater of geopolitics and trade relations across the Indian Ocean.
No Nation is an Island
Sri
Lanka has never been an island; its trade and diplomatic relations
traced back to the ancient kingdoms of Asia as well as the ruling empires of
Europe. Trade linkages—in the form of goods, services, and knowledge—have long
connected Sri Lanka with the rest of the world, including the 1773 Boston Tea
Party and the new American republic. Trade in knowledge proved more enduring and
important than mere goods and services; and the Portuguese, Dutch, and British
all carried Christianity to the predominantly Buddhist nation. Buddhism itself
came to the island from India centuries before colonialism. Sri Lanka then acted
as a magnifying conduit, diffusing Buddha’s noble teachings around the world and
attracting Buddhist scholars like Chinese Monk Fa-hsien in the early fourth
century, and peace activists like Army Colonel Henry Olcott of the American
Civil War in the late nineteenth century, to its shores. Arab traders introduced
Islam; Indian rulers promoted Hinduism. Today, Sri Lanka is a multi-religious,
multi-ethnic, and multilingual nation. The island—with such diversity within a
highly-educated and entrepreneurial population of 20 million—remains a grand
central seaport in the Indian Ocean, one that has increasingly become of
strategic importance to China, India, and America (CIA). As in ancient times,
trade and safe passageway through the Indian Ocean have become a national
security matter to each of these and other nations far and near.
In the recent past, the United States has retreated from the Indian
Ocean region; in doing so, it allowed “non-traditional donors like the Chinese
to fill the vacuum” in Sri Lanka in particular and the South Asian region in
general. In its report, “Sri Lanka: Re-charting U.S. Strategy after the
War”—known as “The Kerry-Lugar Report”—the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee also presented a complete review of the failures of Washington’s
approach. The report notes, “While the United States shares with the Indians and
Chinese a common interest in securing maritime trade routes through the Indian
Ocean, the U.S. Government has invested relatively little in the economy or the
security sector in Sri Lanka.” Both China and India have attempted to fill that
void by reasserting claims to restore their legitimacy and historical supremacy
over Sri Lanka—a strategically located island at the southern tip of the South
Asian sub-continent.
China’s
New Silk Road—a strategic engagement with countries along the ancient
Silk Road for largely energy security purposes—culminates with the
Beijing-funded $100 million Lotus Tower situated in Sri Lanka’s largest city,
Colombo. The hi-tech Lotus Tower will be the tallest structure in South Asia and
the nineteenth tallest building in the world—reportedly visible from as far away
as New Delhi. The iconography makes India nervous, and jealous. In the meantime,
the United States is also uneasy about recent developments in this strategic
maritime corridor. Beijing is likely funding the project to reflect one of the
core foreign policy interests of China’s peaceful rising strategy. In the midst
of this momentous Lotus Tower development, the historically Buddhist nations of
China and Ceylon (Sri Lanka)—a Theravada Buddhist nation—have joined forces to
distinguish their ancient connections from the majority Hindu population of
India and the predominantly Christian nation of the United States. Despite
widespread recognition of their political branding as the largest and most
powerful democracies, India and the United States respectively represent a
lesser union—by way of shared political philosophy and history—when compared to
the centuries-old religious and cultural bonds that link China and Sri Lanka
together.
In international affairs, nations tend to act based on self-interest.
The interplay between various nations promoting their own security in world
politics is a dynamic part of realpolitik; former U.S. Secretary of State Henry
Kissinger defined the term as “calculations of power and national interests.”
Foreign policy textbooks characterize this behavioral interplay as geopolitical
realism. Former British Prime Minister Lord Palmerston captured the very essence
of geopolitics when he said, “We have no eternal allies, and we have no
perpetual enemies. Our interests are eternal and perpetual, and those interests
it is our duty to follow.” This behavioral analysis is relevant to understanding
the geostrategic CIA drama underway in the Indian Ocean region.
United States as a Global Nation
Read More

