A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, June 20, 2013
PCs won’t have police powers Govt. has told India
June 19, 2013, 10:06 pm
By Shamindra Ferdinando
The Defence Secretary said that both, President Mahinda Rajapaksa and
he, had emphasised during deliberations with senior Indian officials
that devolution of police powers would be inimical to the national
interest as well as political stability. "We made our position clear
during talks involving top level delegations from Sri Lanka and India",
he told The Island.
The three-member delegation comprised Presidential Secretary Lalith
Weeratunga, then Senior Presidential Advisor Basil Rajapaksa and the
Defence Secretary. The troika functioned as an informal group on behalf
of President Mahinda Rajapaksa to inform and interact with all those who
matter, within and outside the country, in general and on events
unfolding in Sri Lanka from time to time and visited New Delhi several
times during the war.
India was represented by National Security Advisor M. K. Narayanan,
Foreign Secretary Shivshankar Menon and Defence Secretary Vijay Singh.
The Defence Secretary was responding to Indian media reports of Indian
Premier Manmohan Singh expressing concern over President Rajapaksa’s
decision to amend the 13th Amendment to the Constitution.
The Defence Secretary said vesting provinces with police powers would be
inimical to the interests of minorities. Recollecting a discussion they
had in New Delhi, Rajapaksa said that when Narayanan queried from Singh
what he thought of Rajapaksa’s opposition to police powers being
devolved to provinces, the Indian Defence Secretary had agreed fully
with him.
When it was pointed out that President Rajapaksa had assured India as
well as other countries that his government would offer 13th Amendment
plus, the Defence Secretary said that what the President had meant was
that he would give a better solution acceptable to all communities. It
would be nothing but foolish to misinterpret the President’s assurance
to propagate the falsehood that the government was ready to implement
the 13th Amendment, which was forced on the then President JRJ.
Responding to allegations that Sri Lanka had gone back on its promise to
implement the 13th Amendment after the conclusion of the conflict, the
Defence Secretary alleged that it was the government of India that voted
for the US-led resolution against Sri Lanka at the United Nations Human
Rights Council (UNHRC) after having promised to throw its weight behind
Sri Lanka. "India let us down in Geneva, very badly," the Defence
Secretary said.
Commenting on the proposed Parliamentary Select Committee (PSC) to study
the national issue and make recommendations, the Defence Secretary said
that the tangible actions would have to be taken to ensure the
13th Amendment wouldn’t be the cause for further chaos. If implemented
fully as it is it could create a volatile situation not only in the
Northern Province but other regions as well, the Defence Secretary said.
