A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, January 30, 2014
Tamil People Are Gravely Harmed – ITAK Unanimously Resolves
January 30, 2014
The Central Committee meeting of the Illankai Tamil Arasu Kadchi was
held on January 26, 2014 at the Town Hall, Trincomalee. The meeting was
attended by representatives from all districts in the Northern and
Eastern provinces. The meeting which commenced at 10.30 a.m. under the
chairmanship of R.Sampanthan M.P. President of the I.T.A.K. continued
until 6.30. p.m.
The
Central Committee conveyed its sincere thanks to the people of the
Northern province who overwhelmingly supported the Tamil National
Alliance, and gave the Alliancea convincing victory at the Provincial Council Elections.
The Central Committee unanimously resolved that the Tamil people were
gravely harmed as a result of the following vital issues relating to
their future in the Northern and Eastern Provinces not being resolved,
though almost five years have lapsed since the conclusion of the war.
. Read More
The
case was fixed for hearing on December 20, 2013 before the Supreme
Court. On that occasion, the Attorney General’s Department filed a
motion stating that the relevant Minister had submitted a Cabinet
Memorandum that proposed to grant relief to the diploma holders. It was
claimed that this Memorandum may have an impact on the petitioners as
well. On that basis, the Senior State Counsel asked the Court to
postpone the case, as there was a possibility of a settlement. However,
no copy of this Memorandum was submitted to Court. The matter was taken
off the argument list and fixed before Court on January 30, 2014.
Justice Delayed: 228 Diploma Holders From Northern Province Denied Right To Apply For Public Service Posts Allowed To Other Provinces
January 30, 2014
A Fundamental Rights application by 228 petitioners from the Northern Province was
taken up in the Supreme Court today (January 30, 2014). The petitioners
have stated in their petition that they hold a Higher National Diploma,
which is a qualification that the state has consistently recognized as
equivalent to a university degree for the purpose of entering the public
service. However, according to their petition, these diploma holders
have been prevented from applying for the post of graduate trainee in
the public service. The petitioners have also alleged in their petition
that similarly placed diploma holders from other provinces have been
recruited into the public service as graduate trainees. The petition
names the Minister of Public Administration & Home Affairs and the
members of the Public Service Commission, amongst others, as
respondents.
The
case was fixed for hearing on December 20, 2013 before the Supreme
Court. On that occasion, the Attorney General’s Department filed a
motion stating that the relevant Minister had submitted a Cabinet
Memorandum that proposed to grant relief to the diploma holders. It was
claimed that this Memorandum may have an impact on the petitioners as
well. On that basis, the Senior State Counsel asked the Court to
postpone the case, as there was a possibility of a settlement. However,
no copy of this Memorandum was submitted to Court. The matter was taken
off the argument list and fixed before Court on January 30, 2014.
On January 30, 2014 (today), State Counsel appearing on behalf of the
respondents informed the Court, presided by Justice K. Sripavan, that
the Cabinet Memorandum did not apply to the petitioners, and that it
only applied to diploma holders from other provinces. Once again, the
Cabinet Memorandum was not submitted to Court. Counsel appearing for the
petitioners thereafter made an application to Court requesting an order
compelling the respondents to produce the Memorandum. However, this
application was refused. The matter is now re-fixed for hearing on
September 29, 2014. An application to have the matter heard sooner was
also refused. The petition was originally filed on July 31, 2012.


