A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, January 7, 2014
The Peace Swindle
Erekat wakes up; Abbas still in Cloud Cuckoo Land
by Stuart Littlewood / January 6th, 2014
The Times of Israel reports that
Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat, who recently resigned (again)
but mysteriously remains in post, said in an interview that the
Palestinians will not agree to extending latest talks with Israel one
minute beyond the allotted nine months, ending in April.
“The objective is to reach an agreement on all issues pertaining to a
final-status deal. And according to the wording of the agreement with
[US Secretary of State] Kerry, there will be no transitional or interim
agreement.” He said the US administration was trying to cut the talks
short to preempt any attempt to extend them. In the meantime Israel was
trying to thwart the peace process — and US efforts — in “every way”,
the latest example being an Israeli bill to annex the Jordan Valley,
which passed a key ministerial committee last week.
Proper talks, which started last July, have not been held for two month
owing to stalemate and unofficial meetings had been fruitless. Erekat
said Washington has yet to present the two sides with an official offer.
Where exactly the US gets its authority to make any ‘offer’ without
reference to (and full compliance with) international law and previous
UN resolutions has never been clear to this writer.
We’re also told that Abbas, the de facto Palestinian president who is
well past his clear-your-desk date, has written to Obama that the
Palestine Liberation Organization, which represents the Palestinians to
the outside world, will not accept Israel as a Jewish state, will not
accept a Palestinian state with 1967 borders without Jerusalem, and will
not accept any Israeli on Palestinian land, sea, air and border
crossings after Israel’s withdrawal is completed. Nor will Abbas accept
any solution that does not grant potentially millions of refugees their
right to return and be compensated, as per UN Resolution 194, and allow
for the release of prisoners.
None of this is new or surprising; it’s standard stuff and should be
unobjectionable, supported as it is by UN resolutions (unimplemented)
and international law (unenforced).
According to the Times of Israel, Erekat said Abbas presented
these preconditions to the Arab League, which passed them to UN Security
Council member states. This is Erekat’s strategy for appealing to the
European Union to recognize the Palestinian state while at the same time
appealing to various international bodies to sign treaties and
protocols that would enable the Palestinian Authority to file a suit
against Israel in the International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague.
Erekat has also produced a crime-sheet of Israeli moves that undermine
the peace process. Again, what’s new? Israel has been sticking two
fingers up, for the whole world to see, all the years Erekat and Abbas
have been involved.
Shambolic
The confidential ‘Palestinian Papers’, leaked by Al-Jazeera in 2011,
revealed the shambolic conduct of the so-called peace process and how
the Palestinian team allowed the Israelis to walk all over them, with US
help.
One of the leak’s sources, a French-Palestinian lawyer and former adviser to the PLO, Ziyad Clot, said in an article in The Guardian that
the peace process was “an inequitable and destructive political process
which had been based on the assumption that the Palestinians could in
effect negotiate their rights and achieve self-determination while
enduring the hardship of the Israeli occupation”. They were “a deceptive
farce whereby biased terms were unilaterally imposed by Israel and
systematically endorsed by the US and EU”. They “excluded for the most
part the great majority of the Palestinian people: the seven million
Palestinian refugees”. And, he said, “the PLO, given its structure, was
not in a position to represent all Palestinian rights and interests”.
So why is Erekat still engaging in it? He was educated in political
science in the US and conflict studies in England, so should be
articulate and media-savvy. He became chief negotiator in 1995. He
occupies a king-pin position in the world’s hottest hot-spot but how
often do we see him in the Western media? When was the last time? He is
possibly the least successful negotiator in the world, and where has
that got the Palestinians? He also has a habit of resigning then popping
up again. Is there really no-one else?
Furthermore, there’s still no sign that Abbas himself has got his
backside into gear and commenced the necessary preparations for
Palestine to activate the ICC and bring long-overdue war crimes charges
against Israel. It’s also a bit late in the day for Erekat to suddenly
see the light. Does any of this actually take us nearer a sane justice
process, as opposed to the shameful ‘kangaroo’ peace negotiations that
Erekat and Abbas seem addicted to?
As Oliver Cromwell told the English Parliament in 1653: “You have sat
too long for any good you have been doing lately… Depart, I say; and let
us have done with you. In the name of God, go!” It might be appropriate
for those same words to be addressed to Erekat and Abbas, and indeed
the entire PLO and Palestinian Authority… the whole caboodle a futile
waste of space.
Stuart Littlewood’s book Radio Free Palestine, with Foreword by Jeff Halper, can now be read on the internet by visitingradiofreepalestine.org.uk. Read other articles by Stuart.
