Friday, April 4, 2014


April 4, 2014
India's decision to abstain From voting On the US-sponsored resolution at the UNHRC against alleged War crimes by Sri Lanka was taken at the "political" level for the welfare of the Tamils ​​in that country, the External Affairs Ministry said On Friday.

"Any decision relating to foreign Policy is a political decision, is not IT? And no official will take a decision Off Without taking a political sign," Foreign Secretary Sujatha Singh told PTI.

Ms. Finance Minister P. Chidambaram was singh this ad to a Question about Last Week's remarks that the decision could have been taken by officials of abstention in the External Affairs Ministry.

Expressing unhappiness, Mr .. Chidambaram had further said, "Twenty Three countries have had of Supported of Supported even if IT and IT We should also One was a watered down."

From The Foreign Secretary said the resolution was voting abstained As IT On "Extremely intrusive" and that New Delhi has always been against any country-specific resolution in UNHRC.

"Called upon Resolutions The Last Two Sri Lankan Government to Look into the Issue and to Work toward Reconciliation. Extremely intrusive This year was the resolution. It Proposed an International mechanism, an Open ended International mechanism, and such an intrusive mechanism in our Mind Level We do not, "she said.

The Foreign Secretary said the decision to abstain was "our Analysis Based On" of the Issue.

This is that From abstained voting for the resolution On the First Time - 'promoting Reconciliation, Accountability and Human rights in Sri Lanka'.

"It's not just showing Solidarity with the Tamils ​​in Sri Lanka for the Sake of showing Solidarity. We have to be able to get Results On the Ground and We have We Tamils ​​in Sri Lanka that are able to Show to help them to.

"You know the Biggest Housing project is being implemented in the world over there (by
), "she said. (PTI)