A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, April 7, 2014
UN to review 20-year confidentiality clause ‘at a later stage’-War crimes probe targeting Sri Lanka:

By Shamindra Ferdinando-April 6, 2014,
The United Nations said that the issue of confidentiality of sources/eyewitness needed to be considered at a later stage.
A senior UN spokesperson said: "The High Commissioner for Human Rights
will now be making arrangements for a comprehensive investigation
requested by the United Nations Human Rights Council and these are
issues which will need to be considered at a later stage. In any case,
the protection of witnesses and their consent to sharing their
identities remain the overriding considerations when dealing with these
matters."
Twenty two countries on March 27 voted for a US-led resolution meant to
empower the High Commissioner for Human Rights to investigate war crimes
allegations as well as other violations from February 2002 to May 2009.
Being a member of the UNHRC comprised of 47 countries, the US too,
voted for its own resolution.
The official was responding to The Island query whether the UN would
review UNSG Ban Ki-moon’s Panel of Experts (PoE) recommendation
pertaining to confidentiality of sources/eyewitnesses. The
recommendation was made in PoE’s report released on March 31, 2011.The
Island also queried whether the UNHRC team investigating accountability
issues in Sri Lanka would receive access to those who had provided
information to the PoE leading to accusations of mass scale slaughter of
civilians on the Vanni east front.Sri Lanka’s Killing Fields produced
by UK media outfit, Channel 4 News as well as PoE while estimating the
number of deaths at over 40,000 asserted that the actual number of
civilian deaths could be much more.
The PoE recommended that the identities of those who had made war crimes
allegations against Sri Lanka shouldn’t be released until March 31,
2031 (Twenty years from the day it was released).
(PoE report: Page 6-Point 23): "In some instances, the Panel received
written and oral material on the condition of an assurance of absolute
confidentiality in the subsequent use of the information. The Office of
Legal Affairs (OLA) confirmed through formal legal advice that the
provisions set out in the Secretary General’s Bulletin on "Information
sensitivity, classification and handling" (ST/SGB/2007/6) could be
applied to its records. This Bulletin provides for classification of a
document as ‘strictly confidential’ with correspondingly strict limits
on any access for a period of 20 years, following which a
declassification review may be undertaken that weighs the equities
involved in retention or release. Moreover, OLA confirmed that, where
necessary and appropriate for the Panel’s work, the panel could give an
undertaking of absolute confidentiality in the subsequent use. As a
result, nearly all of the Panel’s substantive records will be classified
as ‘strictly confidential’ with, in some cases, additional protections
regarding future use."
Asked whether the US would request UN/PoE to review their position on
the recommendation pertaining to confidentiality of
sources/eyewitnesses, US embassy spokesperson in Colombo said: " The
United States urges the Government of Sri Lanka to cooperate with the
Office of the High Commissioner and accept technical assistance from the
United Nations as well as help from the international community.
Specifics regarding the investigation should be addressed to the Office
of the High Commissioner for Human Rights."
The British High Commission spokesperson said: "The detail of the
investigation will be determined by the UN High Commissioner for Human
Rights."
UK based spokesperson for the Global Tamil Forum (GTF) Suren Surendiran
told The Island: "Until proper practicing and functioning democracy
returns to Sri Lanka, proper governance of government is in place with
independent institutions like the State Police, judiciary etc. and above
all some kind of international protection mechanism for witnesses is in
place in Sri Lanka and abroad, there will be no reason for GTF to call
for breaking confidentiality of witnesses who have already given
evidence.
"As a matter of fact, it will be suicidal for the Tamils to make such
call when a brutalizing occupying Army numbering tens of thousands are
placed in the North and East, white van abductions still take place for
Sri Lanka to be ranked almost within the top five countries for
disappearances in the world, sexual violence and rights violations are
increasing at an alarming rate, according to a recent report published
by one of the UN Panel of Experts, religious intolerance against
minority religions particularly against the Muslim and Christian faiths
are on an upward trajectory."
The EU mission as well as the French embassy didn’t respond to The
Island queries as regards their position on the UN’s confidentiality
clause.
The EU threw its weight behind the US resolution.
