A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, February 8, 2015
Maithri should bear that his insecurity lies in the hands of SLFP lead UPFA – Ali asghar


Sunday, 08 February 2015
Justice without power is helpless, power without justice is tyrannical – Blaise Pascal
Rajapaksa as a whole exercised the above proverb under his tenure during his presidency. The justice of Rajapaksa was the power and the law of Rajapaksa was the loyalty. If you are a pro Rajapaksa and if you are a twig in the Rajapaksa tree you are immune to the law. Even if you not an anti Rajapaksa but a normal citizen the Rajapaksa law would swallow you. Rajapaksa law became weak in front of an influence and the Rajapaksa law tirelessly attacked the frail.
Rajapaksa as a whole exercised the above proverb under his tenure during his presidency. The justice of Rajapaksa was the power and the law of Rajapaksa was the loyalty. If you are a pro Rajapaksa and if you are a twig in the Rajapaksa tree you are immune to the law. Even if you not an anti Rajapaksa but a normal citizen the Rajapaksa law would swallow you. Rajapaksa law became weak in front of an influence and the Rajapaksa law tirelessly attacked the frail.
Chasing
the poor from their only owned house in Colombo without compensation,
mercilessly murdering the inmates from the Welikada prison, robbed the
assets and properties of Lalith Kothalawala were exercised according the
Rajapaksa law. Murdering the criminals taken to show the hidden arms,
grabbing the lands of the ordinary citizens in the North, killing of
journalist by breaking skulls, taking people hostile in to custody by
the prevention of Terrorism Act, innocent people abducted during the
emergency law, unlawful detention without inquiry, attacks launched on
university students, killing of protestors in Rathupaswala, Chilaw and
Katunayaka, killing of the innocent Muslims in Aluthgama under a curfew
was all orchestrated in accordance to the Rajapaksa law. The associates
who made money from mega deals are also in accordance to the Rajapaksa
law.
Once in a while the Rajapaksa needed a frank to generalize its
uncivilized conduct. There should be a Chief Justice, Attorney General
or another judge ready to disperse the justice when asked. Law books,
previous judgments, constitutional provisions are all unnecessary. If a
judge refuses to conform to stamp the Rajapaksa judgment that Judge
existence came to an end. The unlawful and uncivilized impeachment
brought against the former Chief Justice was exercised due to the reason
she refused to stamp the Divineguma Bill of the economic development
minister Basil Rajapaksa. Therefore Mohan Pieris is chosen as the ideal
person for the job. Mohan Pieris’s law confirms his loyalty and the
ignorance of his knowledge in convention laws by staying beside his
leader even during the elections day night.
Mohan Pieris is a good banker, a good arms dealer. In order to render
something he demands something. In order to dispense a justice he
expects a profit. If he is allowed to stay in the bench as the chief
justice of the Supreme Court he will give whatever the judgment the
dealer want. In order to leave the Chief Justice post he needs an
ambassador post. Therefore by keeping him we cannot bring good
governance in the Judiciary and we cannot establish the rule of law.
That is similar to appointing Sakvithi Ranasinghe as the central Bank
Governor. We cannot move a single step independently forward with the
existence of Mohan Pieris. Therefore he has to be ousted for the best
interest of the citizens.
Under this situation removing Mohan Pieris is a fearless decision taken
by the Maithri governance to establish the rule of law and the
independence of the judiciary. Kamalesh Sharma the secretary general of
the Commonwealth too has shown his consent regarding the removal of
Mohan Pieris. Therefore it’s not wrong if we conform that there is an
international approval complied.
The derailment of the Judiciary, happen from Chief Justice sarath N
Silva to Mohan Pieris, has been corrected now. There is a space opened
to establish the rule of law and to have a healthy judiciary. People who
were deprived due to the lawlessness and inequity over a period of time
can seek justice from this opportunity. In future, following the
Maithri precedence a senior Chief Justice would be appointed. The
independent commissions would be established and the public service can
continue its functions without hindrance. The new government would use
the people’s mandate for the best interest of its citizens.
In future we can hope the law would treat everybody equal and there will not be incidents of murders when taking anybody to show the hidden arms and the fear of the ordinary people of chasing them from their houses.
At this situation the opposition is showing their agitation for removing Mohan Pieris. Dinesh Gunawardana who appeared in Derana 360 still persist that Mohan Pieris is the Chief Justice. SLFP members Nimal Siripala, Susil Premjayanth, Anura Priyadharshana, Dilan Perera raised their voice against the removal of Mohan Pieris apart Wimal and Vasu’s uproar in the parliament. Lakshman Kiriella had to explain that it was the SLFP leader who removed Mohan Pieris. However Nimal Siripala expressed although it is the president who is their party leader he is against this removal. From his statement it is implied that they still comply the authoritarian governance of Mahinda and they are against the necessary reforms of the new government.
There
is another political indication conveyed from this agitation. That
would be although the official leader of SLFP is President Maithripala
still the SLFP MP’s are loyal to Mahinda. Mahinda’s shadow is still
falling on to the SLFP. It can reactivate anytime and stand against
Maithri at any moment. In order to bring good governance President
Maithri cannot hold both the presidency and the party leadership at the
same time, he has to give up the party leadership to Chandrika or to any
other. Holding both posts is a conflict of interest where Maithri has
to oblige for the demands of the current Rajapaksa parliament.
President Maithri has to keep in mind that he was and he would be
secured only by the force erupted against Mahinda, not the conventional
hands of the SLFP and its appointments. Once again the security of
President Maithripala Sirisena does not lie under the current security
heads who are serving long time under the Rajapaksa regime. Therefore
President Maithripala considering the best interest of the people (not
his part) should use his executive powers and take immediate
institutional, constitutional, judicial and military reforms before it
is too late
Ali asghar
Ali asghar
