A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, February 1, 2015
Showing That Lessons Are Learnt From The Past
The
interim budget of the National Democratic Front government presented by
its Finance Minister Ravi Karunanayake was easily the most
people-friendly budget of any government in recent times. It was
described as a mini-budget, unlike the main budget that makes its
appearance in November. But it will have a significant impact on the
lives of the majority of people who are still far from being the middle
income earners that Central Bank figures used to make out. The new
government has claimed that the economic situation is far from being the
rosy one painted by the former government. Nevertheless it has
sacrificed government revenue by reducing several taxes and prices of
essential commodities. As in the case of the reduction of the prices of
petrol and diesel fuel a fortnight ago, the government acted boldly in
giving big price concessions rather than niggardly ones.
One of the main charges leveled against the former United People’s
Freedom Alliance government is that it led the country into massive debt
due to its white elephant projects, waste and corruption. However, the
new government appears to have decided that it will address repaying
the debts to a later time. It is not repeating the politically damaging
policies of the short-lived United National Front government of 2001-04
which was also headed by today’s Prime Minister, Ranil Wickremesinghe.
That government too inherited an economy in very bad shape. The
expenditures on the war against the LTTE that was taking place in full
force at that time had drained the economy. One prong of the
government’s remedy to this problem was to slash government expenditures
and to try to stimulate private sector investments.
The UNF government was successful in reviving the economy. Its policies
were rational in terms of economics. But its policies created
hardships to the masses of people and were resented by them. In
addition, the government sought to deal rationally with the issue of the
war against the LTTE by entering into a ceasefire agreement with it
with the support and praise of the international community. However,
both of these rational policy shifts by the UNF government proved to be
deeply unpopular with the masses of people. The economic recovery
programme of the government doomed the poorer sections of the population
to further belt-tightening and suffering. The people did not get the
immediate relief they had hoped for when they voted for a change of
government in 2001.
Lesson learnt
At the same time as it sought to rationalise the economy through
cost-cutting measures, the UNF government sought to stabilise the
country through a peace process with the LTTE. The international
community was prepared to support the government in this. What followed
was a textbook case of mediation and conflict resolution. However, the
UNF government’s efforts to make the LTTE a partner in the peace
process caused unease amongst the majority of people who did not trust
the LTTE. This enabled the government’s political rivals to accuse it of
betraying the country to the LTTE and to the international community.
As a result the government could not keep its hold on power and was soon
defeated at elections.
The mini budget presented on Thursday is an indicator that the new NDF
government headed by Prime Minister Wickremesinghe has learnt from its
previous experience in regard to the economy. Although the country is
deep in debt due to the shortcomings in the economic policies of its
predecessor government, the new government has decided not to pass the
burden onto the masses of people immediately. Instead it has heeded
their desire for a measure of relief from economic hardship that the
former government was getting increasingly oblivious to. The former
UPFA government was content with putting up big shows, including both
exhibitions of Sri Lanka’s triumphs and large infrastructure projects
that showed people the fruits of development that could be theirs, but
in the future.
The former UPFA government believed it had an unbeatable formula to
obtain the support of the majority of people due to its constant
mobilisation of Sinhalese ethnic nationalism. It constantly reminded
the ethnic majority of the military victory it had obtained over the
LTTE and the militancy of the Tamil ethnic minority. It warned about
future threats to the unity of the country and to the primary place of
the Sinhalese as the ethnic majority.
It also claimed that the international community was seeking to revive
the LTTE and used that justification to bolster the strength of the
military and rule the ethnic minorities with a heavy hand. It added the
Muslim community as a second threat to the country and sought to add to
the fears of the ethnic majority to obtain their political support.
Caution needed
In catering to the needs of the majority of people through its mini
budget, the new government has shown it is being pragmatic about
retaining the support of the majority of people in anticipation of
general elections in June. But if it is to prevail at the forthcoming
elections, it will be important for the new government to specifically
woo the ethnic majority, of whom a significant majority voted for the
former president. In the period 2001-04, the UNF government lost its
popularity due to its harsh economic policies in relation to the
majority of people, but also due to the erosion of confidence that
accompanied its efforts to compromise with the LTTE for the sake of
peace.
There is a similar issue this time. This time around, the LTTE is no
longer the threat, but it has been replaced by the international
community that is pressing for accountability on the part of the former
government leaders for war crimes. Unlike the former government that
refused to engage with the international community on the issue of war
crimes, and has the sympathy of the ethnic majority on this issue, the
new government has shown its willingness to engage with the
international community on the issue of war crimes. It has sent one of
the country’s top diplomats Jayantha Dhanapala to the meet with the UN
High Commissioner for Human Rights to ask for time and space to cope
with this issue. Unless properly handled, the issue of war crimes and
accountability can undermine the popularity of the new government
regardless of the economic benefits it provides the people.
The former leaders of the government, especially former president
Mahinda Rajapaksa have repeatedly told the people that they fought
against and destroyed the LTTE for the sake of the country and its
people. The former president has said he is prepared to go to the
electric chair if he can save the country from being divided and the
soldiers who fought the war from being punished. This type of speech is
very emotive and can evoke the political support of the Sinhalese
ethnic majority who has been given a high dose of nationalistic
propaganda over the past decade by the former government leaders and
propagandists.
It is in this context that the promise of the new government leaders not
to permit any Sri Lankan to be taken away to an international court for
war crimes and instead to hold a domestic inquiry into accountability
issues needs to be viewed.

