We are still not completely aware of the final shape of the
19thAmendment. When it came to the committee stage, there were 63
amendments from the government itself, while the opposition proposing
111 in competition. The government eventually withdrew some of their
amendments as a way of compromise, while the opposition did the same or
compelled to do so. The President Sirisena admirably influenced both
sides for realistic compromises staying in his office in Parliament
throughout the debate yesterday.
( April 29, 2015, Sydney, Sri Lanka Guardian) Finally,
finally the 19th Amendment is passed with only one UPFA MP opposing.
Perhaps he was true to what he was advocating while many others were
chickening out, including the ‘law professor.’ There was an eleventh
hour compromise on the Constitutional Council, but the government
rightly did not budge on the appointment of Cabinet of Ministers. If the
President kept all the powers to unilaterally appoint the cabinet of
ministers, as the opposition wanted through their dubious amendment,
then there was no much meaning of the 19th Amendment. The main purpose
finally was to remove the draconian powers of the Presidency. The
complete abolition required a referendum as the Supreme Court
determined. That was beyond the promise or the mandate.