A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Friday, April 24, 2015
The Dalai Lama:
the laughing Buddha of modern times

Tenzin Gyatso, better known as His Holiness Dalai Lama XIV, is arguably
the most popular spiritual leader of the world today. Though he doesn’t
radiate ‘spirituality’, he demonstrates it by his practice and his
precept; he is the most relaxed looking ‘holy man’ that people of all
faiths are inspired to look on and listen to; his smiling face looks
hardly saintly; by his own account, he is ‘a simple monk’; he is the
Buddhist ‘missionary’ who advises potential converts from other than
Buddhist backgrounds to stick to their original religions if they feel
comfortable in them, saying that he believes ‘that all the major world
religions have the potential to serve humanity and develop good human
beings’; by ‘good’ human beings, he says he means those who ‘have a good
and more compassionate heart’. What better healing advice can a
spiritual and ethical teacher give to humanity that is living today in a
world riven by brands of hate driven religious fanaticism? The
extremely politicized Nobel Peace Prize may have accidentally recovered
some of its lost prestige by being awarded to the Dalai Lama in 1989.
But all the adulation that he inspires leaves him unaffected. He is an
example, if not an epitome, of egolessness; his relative freedom from
‘the illusion of the self’ is the essence of his magnetic personality.
This does not, however, stop him from being identified as a
controversial political figure in robes. In fact, that is the other side
of his public image, for he is also a man of the world, a consummate
politician, as he ought to be, as both the spiritual and temporal leader
of his unique tradition governed community , the Tibetans. Tenzin
Gyatso may be called a willing philosopher-king who is not being allowed
to rule his kingdom. Historically speaking though, he is the deposed or
self-exiled 14th ruler in a line of God-Kings that ruled the country
from the mid-17th to the mid-20th century.
The Dalai Lama that we know has come to us through the media, which is
as good as if he came to us in person. However, behind the affably
smiling, lovable, somewhat clownish, yellow clad Yeatsian figure of ‘a
comfortable kind of old scarecrow’ is the sage who exemplifies in his
conduct and speech the two cardinal virtues of wisdom and compassion
taught in Buddhism. He easily reminds us of the Laughing Buddha, who is
basically a part of Chinese Buddhist and Japanese Shinto culture. Though
the Shinto religion predated Buddhism in Japan, the Laughing Buddha was
later admitted into its pantheon as one of the seven gods of good luck.
Actually, the Laughing Buddha is believed to have originated in a mix
of Buddhist and Shinto religions during the latter part of the Liang
dynasty in China. Pu Tai or Bu Dai (so called because of the trademark
cloth sack he carried) was a Ch’an (Zen) Buddhist monk who lived in that
period (907-923 CE). Though a beggar (a Buddhist bhikkhu is by
definition a beggar), he was contented and happy in the way a Buddhist
monk had to be. His never failing smile (which expressed his
loving-kindness, friendliness, metta/maithri) made people happy wherever
he went, and this earned him another nickname, the ‘Loving/Friendly
One’. He came to be honoured as a bodhisattva (a buddha-to-be). The
Laughing Buddha is venerated as the Maithriya Buddha-to-be, the future
Buddha according to the belief of Buddhists belonging to different
sects. The Dalai Lama is regarded as an ‘emanation’ of Bodhisattva
Avalokiteshvara, an iconic figure that embodies boundless compassion.
Just as the Laughing Buddha tradition is claimed to have brought
Chinese, Indian, Japanese, and later, even Western cultures closer
together, so can the Dalai Lama phenomenon be regarded as a force for
easing East-West tension and for dowsing sectarian passions engulfing
the world at present.
There is no monolithic version of Buddhism that is followed across the
world. Seeds of the Buddhist teaching which were planted by ancient
missionary monks in different parts of the world have given rise to a
bewildering mass of sects, movements, and divisions of Buddhism coloured
by local cultures. However, the basic teaching of the Buddha, the Four
Noble Truths, is common to all these versions. Scholars of Buddhism
recognize three main schools: Theravada (the Teaching of the Elders),
the traditional Mahayana (the Great Vehicle), and its split Vajrayana
(the Diamond Vehicle). Tibetan Buddhism, of which the Dalai Lama is the
best known exponent, consists of elements from all three branches. Of
the four main schools of Tibetan Buddhism Nyingma, Sakya, Kegyu, and
Gelug, the Dalai Lama represents the last.
Recently, it was reported that though he was invited to visit Sri Lanka
by some Buddhist monks, he was denied a visa by the government. The
government’s denial of a visa is not something difficult to understand.
In this regard, the Sri Lankan government has been caught up in a Catch
22 situation in that Sri Lankans cannot extend their eager hospitality
to His Holiness without antagonizing China, Sri Lanka’s indispensable
friend-in-need. The reason for this dilemma is that the Dalai Lama is
being used by the West as a bludgeon against the emerging superpower,
for the Tibet problem provides the West with an ideal opportunity to
rock on its liberal hobby horse. The refusal of a visa to His Holiness
by the government, while confirming our friendly relations with China,
will not lessen the Lama’s compassionate goodwill towards the Sri
Lankans, nor will such refusal unnecessarily disappoint them in spite of
it effectively denying them a chance to have him among them for a short
time. But they are already able to see him well through his words and
actions.
Dalai Lama XIV has been of interest to the West and to China in contrary
ways from the very beginning. When the young Dalai Lama (then only 24)
fled Tibet and reached the Indian border after a two week trek across
the mountains disguised as a common soldier in 1959, it made world news,
as Lynn M. Hamilton says in her short biography of the Tibetan leader
‘The Dalai Lama: A Life Inspired’ (Oct. 2014); according to her, the
then US president Dwight Eisenhower put a trail of pins in a map tracing
the Lama’s escape route! Hamilton says that CIA operative John Greaney
cabled to India asking on behalf of the US that the Dalai Lama be given
asylum there. She is unable to say whether or not this US directive
influenced the Indian response to the problem. But the Indian premier of
the time, Jawaharlal Nehru, of his own accord, gave the Lama political
sanctuary, and eventually settled him and his fellow Tibetan refugees in
Dharamsala where he is based to this day.
China acts as if the Dalai Lama is a threat to it. He may or may not be,
for different reasons. But one thing is clear: It is that he has become
a pawn in the chessboard of geopolitics where the two major players
America and China try to move him as their interests dictate.
Unfortunate though that is, it doesn’t concern those of us who are only
interested in the moral or spiritual message he has to communicate to
the world. We remember that there were anti-Chinese protests in Tibet in
the lead up to the Olympics in Beijing in 2008, sometimes involving
violence, which the Chinese blamed the Dalai Lama for. They said he was a
political stooge in the pay of American intelligence. Chinese
supporters maintained that there was no ‘ national liberation struggle’
as such in Tibet, but that ‘secessionists’ backed by America were
causing disruption. Zhang Qingli, the secretary of the Communist Party
in Tibet was widely reported to have made the following comments: (in
translation) "The Dalai Lama is a wolf wrapped in a habit, a monster
with human face and an animal’s heart". This characterization is not
accepted by many including both pro-China and anti-China commentators.
In 2008, Randeep Ramesh, a journalist attached to The Guardian, London
(UK), ridiculed the Chinese concern as a case of "a Chinese dragon
(being) scared by a mouse that prayed".
As far as that conflict (that involving the Lama being wooed by the West
and rejected by China) goes, it is hardly likely that Tibet will
eventually be able to assert itself as an entity independent of the
latter, despite or because of the fact that it is wedged between three
nuclear powers, while being located in a watershed that plays an
important part in the world’s water supply. On the other hand, Tibet’s
cultural deracination as a cross product of these forces is inevitable,
but that will not be the end of the 14th Dalai Lama’s influence on the
peace loving rational people of the world. The institution of the Dalai
Lama as the political and spiritual leader of Tibet may have already
lapsed into obsolescence. Probably, no one knows this better than the
present Dalai Lama himself. According to Donald Lopez, professor of
Buddhist and Tibetan Studies at the University of Michigan, ‘the Dalai
Lama has been one of the harshest critics of "old Tibet"…’. He adds that
the Lama would have introduced political reforms without the Chinese
intervention. Professor Robert Barnett, Director of Modern Tibetan
Studies at Columbia University believes that ‘as a political leader, he
asks for very little – he seems quite happy to accept a merely symbolic
gesture like a cup of tea and a photo’. That may to put too low a value
on his actual political significance. In any case, he has tried to come
to an agreement with the Chinese authorities by opting for a degree of
autonomy for Tibet while remaining a territory of China, provided it is
allowed to enjoy a status that is similar to the status of Hong Kong: a
large measure of self-government with its own political and legal
systems. He has even indicated his readiness to let Tibet have a
communist government, with "meaningful" autonomy, but China will not
agree to such a settlement. It may be that with the death of the Dalai
Lama (80 this year) the world may forget Tibet as it was with him
living; it will be the end of history for Tibet under its god-king. The
Dalai Lama’s lasting legacy for the world will be what he stands for
today as a spiritual leader.
To be continued tomorrow
