A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Saturday, October 24, 2015
All Fallow Lands To Be Cultivated!
By Hema Senanayake –October 23, 2015

I am an economic analyst and a macroeconomic researcher. If anybody
wants to see further than others on any subject he or she has to do one
thing. This was eloquently told by Sir Isaac Newton the great scientist.
He said that, “If I have seen further it is by standing on the
shoulders of giants.” This quote is from a letter written to fellow
scientist, Robert Hooke in February 1675. The phrase is understood to
mean that if Newton had been able to discover more about the universe
than others, then it was because he was working in the light of
discoveries made by fellow scientists, either in his own time or
earlier.” This is what I always try to do in regard to economics.
Does the president or Prime Minister do this in regard to economics? I
do not think so. And most importantly, there is no necessity for them to
do it. They are politicians elected democratically to hold the most
important public offices. They have to perform many duties. Among them
what I consider most important are; “(1) activating and mobilizing
citizens into participating in political decisions and transforming
their opinions into viable policy options and (2) channeling public
opinion from citizens to government.” (This quote is from The Electoral
Knowledge Network).
Now, if the president or Prime Minister tells something wrong in regard
to the pursuing of economic policy or part of it, what should I do? What
their economic advisors should do? I am serious about this question.
Why?
Around the world, many politicians elected to governments believe that
they know better than economists. This happens even in many advanced
countries. A few years ago, for an example, about seventy or so
congressmen in the United States proposed to have a constitutional
amendment which makes it mandatory to have a balance budget on the
Federal Government. This was proposed to stop the ever increasing public
debt on the federal government. If the budget is required to be
balanced by law, there is no necessity to borrow for the government. In
the event, public debt cannot go up.
Luckily, the congress and the senators consulted many leading economists
who advised as to why the common sense proposal for balance budget was
bad for the country. Finally, politicians gave it up. In fact, most of
the common sense proposals of politicians do not work in the economic
system. One of the most ridiculous proposals was submitted by Stalin to
stop using money in Russia in early 1930s. There was inflation by that
time in Russia. Stalin’s argument was simple. In order to combat
inflation he argued that, “when there is no money there is no
inflation.” His economic advisors defended Stalin’s policy. Are our
advisors different? I do not know.

