A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, February 16, 2016
New Constitution: Need to Address Post-War Challenges Effectively

Featured image courtesy constitutionnet.org (photo credit: Hemmathagama)
Constitutional design processes are loaded with expectations
about endurance, efficacy, the resolution of conflicts, and political reconstruction.
In the real world, however, most constitutions fail” (Ginsburg et al. 2009: 22;).
Ever since the political changes which ensued in 2015, there appears to
be another social contract between the government and the people of Sri
Lanka forming. Clear signs are on the horizon that people are now waking
up to the reality that the country needs a qualitative change of the
political culture and a national reconciliation platform, in order to go
forward, and that such changed realities are calling for their active
participation, inclusion, and transparency to overcome many
socio-political challenges including ethnic discord, widespread
corruption and abuse. Thus, it is not possible for the drafters to
ignore these realities, when the country is in the process of drafting
another constitution, to ensure that it incorporates and reflects the
needs and aspirations of the citizens it is intended to govern. How the
government responds to these calls for public participation and
inclusion may determine whether the constitution-making process unites
or further divides this society, whether they help or hinder the
creation of a national consensus on fundamental principles and values,
and whether the processes and documents that result from them will be
deemed legitimate.
There is no single blueprint for how to make a viable constitution, but
our Post –Independence decades of constitution-making experience and
from elsewhere, underscore that mere top-down approaches are rarely
effective, without a supportive inclusive and participatory constitution
making approach. There should therefore be a healthy blend of an
expert-based drafting process, with adequate public consultation, which
would more effectively address root causes of conflict and sectarian
divisions, and ensure that the political process benefits from the full
contribution of all citizens, including women and youth. To achieve
optimal results, constitution makers must have the political will to
carry out a genuine process of civic education and consultations, in
which the views of citizens are not only carefully considered, but they
are also educated in the process, on the national priorities and
inherent dangers of following partisan policies. The constitution makers
must carefully apply guiding principles, such as transparency and
inclusion, and ensure that sufficient time and resources are allocated
to the process. Otherwise, political opportunism will take root and
people will once again be taken up a blind path to oblivion. We cannot
afford to have repeat 1972s/1978s which has polarised our communities
and divided our nation.

