A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, February 2, 2016
TISL Perturbed by the Finance Minister’s “No Questions” Policy

Transparency
International Sri Lanka (TISL) is perturbed by the recent moves of the
Minister of Finance, encouraging inward remittances in to Sri Lanka from
investors (local, foreign and even ’mystery’ investors) on a “No
Questions” asked basis, as a first step in creating a “Financial Centre”
in Sri Lanka. He invited investors to “park” their deposits, including
funds presently in Switzerland and other tax/investment havens, in Sri
Lanka as “special deposits” and offered a premium investment return of
2% per annum, with “no locked in investment period”. He has subsequently
declared that a single “mystery” Belgian national working with a Sri
Lankan partner had already remitted USD 500 million under this scheme
and the balance of the promised total transfer of USD one billion will
follow soon. Officials have separately announced that remittances under
this scheme have topped USD 1.5 billion.
In
announcing the modalities of the deposit scheme, it has been stated
that the remitting banks overseas would have already cleared the
customer and associated due diligence; and hence there is no requirement
for “Know Your Customer” (KYC) and associated validation processes to
be repeated in Sri Lanka, though so required under international
conventions to be carried out by the recipient Banks. Bank officials,
who appear not to have received specific guidelines in connection with
this scheme, believe that the scheme is akin to an “amnesty” being
declared, exempting the receiving Banks from requirements under local
statutory provisions and international guidelines.
This move is contrary to the Prevention of Money Laundering Act
requirements. Accepted regulatory frameworks could be exploited to
‘park’ in Sri Lanka “Black Money” and funds gained through trading in
narcotics, dangerous substances and illegal arms, as well as funds
associated with serious financial crimes, bribery and corruption and
terrorism. It is well recognized that investors of such funds seek new
havens to launder their money; and such investors could be attracted by
the scheme on offer, which in addition have the attractions of a “No
Questions” policy, and provides them with attractive investment returns
with no lock-in period stipulations.
These funds can very easily move back/out to other destinations whenever
thought fit by the investors, especially after serving the objectives
of laundering the money by the using the temporary “parking option”.
Such actions could result in very serious macro economic and financial
stability consequences for Sri Lanka in the future.
Sri Lanka is a signatory to international standards on Combating Money
Laundering and Financing of Terrorism Proliferation (FATF
Recommendations), and this move by the Minister of Finance could lead to
Sri Lanka being internationally penalized. Such a situation will deter
serious and honest foreign investments, which can add significant and
sustainable value to Sri Lanka and its people, from coming into the
island.
The FATF recommendations stipulate compliance procedures to be in place
to ensure customer due diligence, ranging from record keeping and
reporting suspicious transactions to strict regulation and supervision
of financial institutions. In terms of the US Foreign Account Tax
Compliance Act (FATCA), Sri Lankan Banks operating within the framework
of this new “No Questions” scheme may risk being barred from the US
banking system.
The scheme now introduced without transparency and public discussion,
will regrettably create an investment framework operating outside
acceptable and desirable best practices, and is likely to leave the
country, its business sector and citizens exposed to dangers of penal
international sanctions.
