A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, April 28, 2016
Ambedkar’s Legacy: Critique Of Religion, Quest For Social Justice & The Paradox Of Constitutionalism

By Jayadeva Uyangoda –April 27, 2016
May I begin my talk this evening by thanking His Excellency Y. K. Sinha
the Indian High Commissioner in Colombo for inviting me to deliver this
lecture on B. R. Ambedkar? This event is part of a series of
celebrations in connection with the 125th birth anniversary of Babasaheb
Ambedkar, which fell on the 14th of April. I am afraid my talk may not
celebrate great Ambedkar’s memory and legacy as such. It will only
present some disjointed and hurriedly constructed thoughts about the
life and legacy of this great son of South Asia.
Ambedkar’s name is well known in Sri Lanka. In Sinhalese society, the
popular culture of which I am somewhat familiar with, Ambedkar is known
as the leader of India’s Harijan communities. The word dalit is not in
much use in Sinhalese society. The Gandhian neologism of harijan is
better known. Ambedkar is respected as the Harijan leader who embraced
Buddhism along with several thousands of his followers. Sinhalese
Buddhists are particularly sympathetic to Ambedkar and his social reform
movement. For them, Ambedkar’s project constituted a critique and a
rejection of Hinduism. This is despite the fact that Buddhism has
historically and in terms of elite as well as popular practices been
closely interwoven with Hinduism. Quite independent of Ambedkar, Sri
Lankan Buddhists have a somewhat ambivalent attitude towards Hinduism
and Hindu traditions as well. It is almost like their ambivalence
towards India in general, as some of their intellectuals and
professionals seem to be inclined to demonstrate these days.
At the same time, talking publicly of Ambedkar by an ordinary non-Indian
South Asian before an audience with even a few well-informed Indian
citizens is no mean task. Amebdkar’s life, work and thought have been
understood, interpreted, appropriated and commented on a variety of
different ways in India. A Sri Lankan, following the debates and
controversies taking place in the Indian media around Ambedkar’s legacy,
can only be perplexed by the sheer complexity of even the very idea of
what his legacy might mean. Three recent events occurred in India add to
this unending political drama of making sense of the life, work and
thought of one of the greatest Indians of the twentieth century. The
suicide of Rohith Vemula, a post-graduate student of the Hyderabad
Central University, the arrest and release from custody of, and the
subsequent speech by, Kanhaiya Kumar of New Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru
University, and the public embrace of Buddhism by the mother and brother
of Rohith Vemula on the day of Ambedkar Jayanthi last week are these
three very recent events in which the invocation of Ambedkar’s legacy
has been made to some dramatic effect.


