A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Public Representation Committee Report On Constitutional Reform
By S. I. Keethaponcalan –August 20, 2016
Finally, I found the time to sit down and take a look at the Report on Public Representations on Constitutional Reform,
which was released in May 2016. I was keen to carefully read the report
because the appointment of the committee to gather public opinion on
constitutional reform and the work of the Committee were significant
political developments. They marked significant steps forward in the
otherwise extremely slow process of constitution making initiated by the
present government. The Committee comprised of experts from Sinhala,
Tamil and Muslim communities. Within a short period of time, the
Committee managed to visit 25 districts and record more than 2500
representations, which is an impressive achievement by any standard. The
mandate of the Committee was to gather public opinion and to submit a
report to the Constitutional Assembly with “recommendations” to reform
the constitution (p. v).
Recommendation?
It is on the recommendation part, I believe, that I am little
disappointed. A recommendation, in my opinion, means suggesting a course
of action. This course of action may or may not be accepted by the
receiver. According to an online dictionary, recommendation means “a
suggestion or proposal as to the best course of action, especially one
put forward by an authoritative body.” The Merriam-Webster defined
recommendation as “the act of saying that … something is good and
deserves to be chosen.” I write a reasonably good number of
recommendation letters for university admissions and employment.
However, I have never written a letter of recommendation to an employer
saying that the person may or may not be hired. I always say the person
is qualified to be hired or I say that he or she is not qualified to be
hired. So, in recommendation, we propose one or the best course of
action. The employer already knows that the applicant may or may not be
hired.
Therefore, I expected the committee to recommend the “best” course of
action based on the public opinion and socio-political realities in the
country. I also expected the Constitutional Assembly to work around the
best course of action proposed by the Committee. Of, course the
Constitutional Assembly has the power to make any and all changes it
deems fit. However, what the Committee has done is generating options on
important issues. It is only part of the dual strategy adopted by the
Committee. On some issues, especially on uncontroversial elements of the
constitution, there have been genuine recommendations. For example, on
fundamental rights, the Committee recommended a new Bill of Rights with
provisions for the right to life, equality, human dignity and so on.
There has been no second opinion on these issues. That is a
recommendation.
Option Generation
However, on contentious issues, especially elements connected to ethnic
conflict or ethnic conflict resolution, the Committee has taken an easy
way out by simply listing the options available. In my opinion, this
could have been done by a group of research assistants. For example, in
regards to the national flag, the Committee says, the present flag could
be kept without any changes or a new flag could be designed to
accommodate minority sentiments. On religion, six suggestions have been
made ranging from retaining the existing chapter, which confers special
protection to Buddhism to becoming a secular state and providing equal
protection to all religions. Then, on the unit of devolution, the
Committee provided six suggestions or what it called “alternative
formulas.” The Committee does not say which one is most suitable or
should be adopted.
How many of us do not know that when enacting a new constitution, we
could keep the present flag or change it? Many members of the
Constitutional Assembly don’t need an expert-panel to say that there are
two options on this factor; keeping or changing. The point is that most
of the options listed or alternatives presented already exist within
the devolution debate in Sri Lanka. Many of the options have been
already presented by various researchers. My critic is that the
Committee missed a real opportunity to pinpoint something as the best
option and also justify it. This is probably one reason why the report
failed to ignite a serious debate about constitutional reform and even
the report. A debate will explode if (and when) the Constitutional
Assembly settles on a plan.