A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, November 29, 2016
Deal with problems before they escalate

Jehan Perera-November 28, 2016, 8:03 pm
There
are indications of political maneuvering behind efforts to disturb the
peace in the country and to bring ethno-religious nationalism to the
fore. The rising number of incidents of hate speech and local level acts
of violence that appear to have communal undertones has prompted former
President Chandrika Kumaratunga to issue a strong statement that
received national coverage. In her statement she noted the rise of hate
speech in Sri Lanka in the recent past, which challenges the initiatives
being taken by the government to heal the country after decades of
bloodshed and destruction. She said that "Hate filled expressions and
actions by groups with vested interests, resulting in demeaning,
denigrating and inciting violence against fellow citizens of various
ethnic, religious backgrounds has no place in Sri Lankan society."
Video footage of religious clergy engaging in vitriolic attacks on those
of other ethnic and religious groups has gone viral on the social
media. Ethno nationalist organizations have been engaging in hate
campaigns and intimidating those of other communities at the local
level. Most notably in the North and East, there are clashes being
reported on inter religious grounds. There are many incidents of
religious clergy getting involved in expansionist projects, such as
religious conversions, destruction of ancient sites or building places
of worship in areas where they are less numerous. It is important that
the government acts without delay to utilize the law to mete out legal
sanctions against those who seek to gain political advantage by
accentuating the divisions in society.
President Maithripala Sirisena has publicly stated that anyone who
violates the law would be dealt with by the law enforcement agencies. On
the other hand, there are also tensions that arise between the
communities due to a failure of communication. A different approach is
required in these cases. The Ministry of National Integration and
Reconciliation A H M Fowzie is making arrangements to hold programmes to
promote national reconciliation. Minister of Justice and Buddhasasana,
Wijeyadasa Rajapakshe has said that all ethnic and religious groups are
welcome to participate in the dialogue. He said various groups,
including the Bodu Bala Sena and Ravana Balaya, had agreed to
participate in the effort to resolve issues through dialogue.
STUDENT CLASHES
In July this year there was a clash between Tamil and Sinhala students
at Jaffna University. The immediate cause of the conflict was whether a
Sinhala cultural dance could be added to a welcome ceremony for incoming
first year students. The student association decided against it and
opted for the traditional Tamil cultural dance only. This led to a
violent clash. One of the outcomes was the temporary closure of the
university and departure of Sinhala students from Jaffna due to their
fear of further incidents. However, the quick intervention of the
government, and notably President Maithripala Sirisena who got the
student leaders on both sides to meet with him, enabled the restoration
of normalcy.
In addition the university administration decided to ensure that the
healing of relationships between the Tamil and Sinhala student bodies
should be of more sustainable nature. Therefore they organized a
relationship building exercise for the approximately 600 students of the
science faculty who had been involved in the clash. They sought the
services of external facilitators who were from the National Peace
Council and Centre for Communication Training. Dr Joe William and I were
part of the team of facilitators. It seemed to be a daunting task as
the student body was a large one, and there could be hardliners amongst
them who would scuttle an effort at reconciliation. The prospect of this
large number of students, who had already clashed before, turning
hostile during an event meant to promote healing of relationships was a
possibility. Students with their energy and idealism can both be a
constructive force for change or, if they get suspicious or provoked,
can be disruptive.
However, this worst case scenario did not materialize. The students did
not show any sign of aggression. The 500 or so students who did attend
the programme came in good spirits and left the same way. About half of
them were Sinhala students, with almost the same number of Tamil
students and a lesser number of Muslim students (in the ratio of 4:3:1).
As part of the day’s events the students received a crash course on
non-violent communication and thereafter were divided into 45 groups of
12 students each. In order to ensure a maximum of interaction between
the different communities, they were assigned to the groups that were
mixed by ethnicity (Sinhala, Tamil and Muslim) and by their years (first
year, second year and third year).
CULTURED NATION
It was clear that the students appreciated the opportunity to interact
with each other in a structured way. If they had been left to
themselves, they would probably have interacted only with their own
community members. But when they were put into mixed groups and asked to
discuss between themselves they did so with interest and zest. They
were asked to give answers to three questions: what were the burning
issues they faced, what could the university authorities do to address
them, and what could they as students do to help resolve those problems.
As most courses in universities are now conducted in the English
language, the discussions took place in English. Each group was asked to
choose one member of their group to come up onto the stage and present
the outcome of the discussions to the rest of the student body and to
the members of the university administration who were also present.
The main issues highlighted by the students in their group presentations
related to the need for better infrastructure facilities for their
studies. They asked for free Wi Fi facilities to enable them to access
the worldwide web, which is available in universities such as Moratuwa
University. They asked for a study hall for science students. They asked
for a second canteen to purchase their meals as there is currently only
one canteen in the university to service over 5000 students and 1000
staff members. They asked for a gymnasium that is available in most
other universities and for a swimming pool as found in Sri
Jayawardenapura University. They asked for better hostel facilities, and
that these hostels should accommodate students of all years, and not
only first year and final year students.
In addition the students asked for improved language training facilities
so that they could bridge the language barrier. They asked for more
intercultural and social activities so that they could interact more
with each other. They asked for more interaction with students from
other faculties through sports. They also asked for spaces in the
university in which those of minority religions in Jaffna could worship.
None of the ideas put forward by the students were immoderate or
unreasonable. They were not confrontational or hostile. This suggests
the value of engaging in dialogue with others and consulting with them
before problems become aggravated. It is important that the university
authorities are responsive to the needs of the students and to their
dreams. Even a swimming pool is not too much for the state to invest in
students who will form the backbone of a plural, educated and cultured
nation.
