A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, November 20, 2016
Research, Ideology & State Policy In Relation To Trincomalee
The Dress Rehearsal In Trincomalee – Part IV
The New Bosses
Transplanted
from settings where they had the help of family and friends, and thrown
into a new environment as ‘driftwood’, the experience of the colonists
was increasingly one of disillusionment and pauperisation. This made
them more dependent on state patronage, and on politicians who held out
to them the prospect of it. Their use as shock troops by politicians in
the late 50s to break up meetings of the rival party and to harass
delegates travelling to the Federal Party convention from the East have
been mentioned by Vittachi.
To cabinet ministers dealing with land and resettlement, or with some
other subject placing large resources at their command, furthering the
party’s reach through settling more Sinhalese in areas having a Tamil
association became a means of enhancing their prestige and influence.
The prestige came from being seen as the torch- bearers of the Sinhalese
cause into hostile territory. Settlement meant in time new electorates
and their proteges becoming new MPs, strengthening in turn their
position in competition for power within the party.
This gives us an idea of the role Gamini Dissanayake was playing as a
minister in the government of 1977 with the huge resources at his
command. Trincomalee District, where the Tamil population had declined
from 76.5% in 1824 to 60% in 1901 to 37% in 1981, became a target of
concerted attempts to tilt the ethnic (i.e. electoral) balance in favour
of the Sinhalese. The proportion of the latter had increased from about
5% in 1901 to 33% in 1981. Sinhalisation lay at the root of the
administrative policy of appointing Sinhalese GAs for Trincomalee, which
has been followed by all governments.
At local level, the thrust of demographic transformation was led by
administrators, security officials and persons who had entered politics
as proteges of powerful ministers and had established themselves in the
area or in the neighbourhood.
Abeysinghe (see above) describes a particular class of persons who
acquire political influence (p 108), having come to the schemes as
landless casual workhands, often with small time contractors: “These
elements slowly get established through accumulative capital. They get
hold of the alienated land from the weaker, lazy and unsuccessful
farmers/settlers who come within their orbit for funds or help… He
accumulates capital, finances production, lends money for settler needs…
provides tractors/bullocks on hire, purchases the produce in bulk and
becomes a ‘godfather’ to the settlers. He then extends his purview into
local politics… links himself to an established family…through marriage.
He then commands political power through economic power and becomes a
benevolent leader”.
This is a class of persons to whom extending Sinhalese settlements into
neighbouring Tamil speaking areas made, in theory at least, good
economic sense, and also by this means extended their political
influence. H.G.P.Nelson is a politician in this class described by
Abeysinghe: “Nelson in Polonnaruwa came from Tangalle as a labourer… He
first worked as a labourer, and later as a tea maker in his uncle’s
shop. He encroached a canal reservation and gradually made his way up.
He entered local politics and ended up an MP”.
He was appointed District Minister for Trincomalee in 1981. He narrowly
escaped a JVP attempt on his life in October 1987 during the Southern
insurgency of 1987-90. Later the Disappearance Commission for his region
named him along with several leading politicians as being implicated in
disappearances by witnesses who testified. As district minister of
Trincomalee, the local Tamils did not regard Mr. Nelson as personally
harmful. But he was symbolic of the power interests behind him.

