A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, November 7, 2016
YES! Judges Tell Lawless Tory Government That UK Cannot Leave EU Without Parliamentary Approval

![Disgusting Daily Mail headline today. Far from being “Enemies of the People,” the judges who ruled that the Prime Minister cannot trigger our departure from the EU without Parliament’s involvement were only confirming what Leave campaigners claimed to want - UK sovereignty. In the UK, sovereignty lies with Parliament, and not with the Prime Minister, the Cabinet or voters. Theresa May and her ministers, by seeking to exclude Parliament, were actually exercising executive tyranny, and not “frustrat[ing] the verdict of the British public,” as the Mail claims.](http://www.slguardian.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/image.jpg)
( November 5, 2016, London, Sri Lanka Guardian) Great,
great, great news from the High Court, as three of the most senior
judges in the UK — the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, Sir
Terence Etherton, the Master of the Rolls, and Lord Justice Sales —
have ruled that
“Parliament alone has the power to trigger Brexit by notifying Brussels
of the UK’s intention to leave the European Union,” as the Guardian reported
it, adding that the ruling was “likely to slow the pace of Britain’s
departure from the EU and is a huge setback for Theresa May, who had
insisted the government alone would decide when to trigger the process.”
Despite Theresa May’s wishful thinking, the Lord Chief Justice reminded
her — and her ministers — that “the most fundamental rule of the UK
constitution is that Parliament is sovereign,” something that those us
with better knowledge of British democracy than our most senior
ministers have been pointing out for the last four months.
Lord Thomas said, specifically, “The court does not accept the argument
put forward by the government. There is nothing in the 1972 European
Communities Act to support it. In the judgment of the court, the
argument is contrary both to the language used by parliament in the 1972
act, and to the fundamental principles of the sovereignty of parliament
and the absence of any entitlement on the part of the crown to change
domestic law by the exercise of its prerogative powers.”
Unless the ruling is overturned on appeal at the Supreme Court, it
“threatens to plunge the government’s plans for Brexit into disarray as
the process will have to be subject to full parliamentary control,” in
the Guardian’s words.
And so we have it. Finally, 133 days after the EU referendum,
a body of unarguable weight and authority has told the unelected Prime
Minister Theresa May and her deluded ministers that they cannot behave
like tyrants. Sovereignty in the UK lies not with the Prime Minister or
the Cabinet, or the 72.21% of the eligible electorate who voted in a
non-binding referendum, giving a slim majority to those voting to leave
the EU (by 51.9% of those who voted to 48.1%), but with Parliament.
Three-quarters of MPs support the UK remaining in the EU,
so the challenge now is to persuade them to vote in the interests of
the UK rather than deciding that they must comply with the narrowest of
majorities in an advisory referendum that should never have been called
in the first place.
I very much hope to hear in the imminent future that some of the 16.1
million people who voted to remain in the EU will be setting up a
massive lobbying campaign to persuade MPs that they must not endorse any
effort to leave the EU that will be an economic disaster; in other
words, that preserving the single market is unarguably much more
significant than efforts to curb immigration — which, it should be
noted, are in any case likely to be as effective as King Canute, the
Danish king of England a thousand years ago, attempting to hold back the
tide.
As
the ramifications of the ruling sink in, it’s worth just looking back
at how we got to this ridiculous place, where Britain has become an
international laughing stock — except to far-right and hard-left
separatists of various kinds — and racism is now so open and so openly
hostile that anyone who can be regarded as “foreign” can likely expect
abuse — or, at a familiarly polite English level, controlled disdain,
via, for example, inquiries about where they’re from, questions that, it
should be noted, people living here for decades have never been asked
before.
Disgusting Daily Mail headline today. Far from being “Enemies of the
People,” the judges who ruled that the Prime Minister cannot trigger our
departure from the EU without Parliament’s involvement were only
confirming what Leave campaigners claimed to want – UK sovereignty. In
the UK, sovereignty lies with Parliament, and not with the Prime
Minister, the Cabinet or voters. Theresa May and her ministers, by
seeking to exclude Parliament, were actually exercising executive
tyranny, and not “frustrat[ing] the verdict of the British public,” as
the Mail claims.
So let’s begin with the man who should one day be held primarily
accountable for this debacle, Little “Dave” Cameron, whose arrogance was
such that he called a referendum he should never have called to placate
those to the right of him (the far right of the Tory Party, and the
slimeball UK Independence Party), and arrogantly assumed that a campaign
led by himself would walk to victory.
And yet, despite this, it turns out that Cameron was not as terrible a
Prime Minister as he could have been; that award actually goes to
Theresa May. Don’t get me wrong. Cameron was an irritating, patronising
would-be smoothie, and his regime was foul and cruel, with an
unparalleled assault on the fundamental bases of decent society
(essentially, recognizing that the state provisions of services is both
worthwhile and necessary, that the drive to privatise almost everything
is ruinous, and that everyone is society should receive basic
protections).
In his six years as Prime Minister, the country became a darker, more
hard-hearted place, via — to name but a few of the main culprits — his
dysfunctional, tight-fisted, austerity-obsessed Chancellor, George
Osborne; the vicious Iain Duncan Smith, with his Victorian Social
Darwinism, blaming the poor for their poverty by calling them
dysfunctional rather than recognising them as the victims of a
fundamental and ever-growing economic inequality; the slimy school
destroyer Michael Gove; the supremely incompetent justice secretary,
Chris “No Brain” Grayling; and the money-grabbing, social
mobility-wrecking universities minister, David Willetts, known as “Two
Brains” for his supposed intellect, although, as I have always noted, he
may have two brains, but neither of them actually work. And, of course,
let’s not forget his home secretary, Theresa May, whose dangerous
authoritarianism and racism I have written about previously — see As Theresa May Becomes Prime Minister, A Look Back at Her Authoritarianism,
I could go on, but I think I’ve established well enough how desolate the
political landscape was from May 2010, when the Tories first installed
themselves back in power with the help of the hapless Lib Dems, until
June 23 this year, and the EU referendum.
But amazingly, since then, the new reality has been even worse. Theresa
May, it turns out, the only contender left standing after a virtual
shootout that wiped out Cameron, Osborne, Boris Johnson and Michael
Gove, is not a safe pair as hands, as the Thatcher-loving right are
desperate to gush about, but, as those of us paying close attention
already knew, a colossally small-minded, Home Counties bigot, whose
lukewarm support for the Remain campaign turned to an evangelical
fervour for leaving the EU as soon as she became leader.
As a leader, she has been a disaster — visionless, rudderless, still fundamentally bigoted, and capable of wiping eye-watering amounts of money off the value of the pound every
time she has opened her mouth to bleat on about pursuing a “hard
Brexit.” Unable to contemplate resisting any kind of exit from the EU
that would be disastrous for our economy, and for our well-being as a
modern tolerant, inclusive society (which we largely were before June
23), she has blundered on, pointless and clueless, flanked by her three
horsemen of the Apocalypse, her Brexit ministers — David Davis, an
admirable figure over the last decade or so as the Tories’ conscience on
human rights, but hopelessly out of his depth as the minister for the
UK’s suicide (sorry, the Secretary of State for Exiting the European
Union); the idiot Boris Johnson, who “won” the Brexit campaign but
didn’t even want to, and has been beyond satire as foreign secretary —
including at the Spectator Awards this week,
when he promised that the UK would “make a Titanic success” of leaving
the EU, prompting George Osborne, presenting him with a comeback of the
year award, to remind him that the Titanic sank; and, last but not
least, the dangerously right-wing Liam Fox, the Secretary of State for
International Trade, who somehow crawled back to ministerial life after
the disgrace of his companion Adam Werrity being allowed to attend
meetings of international government business when Fox was defence
secretary in 2010-11.
In response to today’s court ruling, a government spokesman said
ministers would appeal to the Supreme Court, and it has already been
announced that that hearing will take place on December 7 and 8. I am
pretty much 100% convinced that the Supreme Court will not disagree with
the High Court’s ruling, so today I am going to carry on celebrating
the fact that, when it came down to it, and as has happened sporadically
during my life, judges have been there to stop the government from
turning the executive branch into a tyranny; and please, let’s not
forget the irony of this coming from ministers whose reason for wanting
to leave the EU was that they regarded it as having been detrimental to
Britain’s own sovereignty; the sovereignty that, in closing, for now, I
must once more reiterate lies with Parliament and not with the Prime
Minister and her cabinet.
So now, let’s please bring on the concerted campaign to persuade MPs to
vote with their brains and their hearts, and to have the courage to say
what Theresa May and her Cabinet have not: that the referendum result
was only advisory, and that anything that fundamentally and profoundly
damages our economy to the extent that the Brexit debacle is already doing cannot
be accepted based on an advisory referendum that should never have been
called and whose alleged victory was only secured with majority so slim
that it does not represent a sufficient mandate for such devastating
upheaval.
Andy Worthington is a freelance investigative journalist, activist, author, photographer, film-maker and singer-songwriter (the lead singer and main songwriter for the London-based band The Four Fathers, whose debut album ‘Love and War’ and EP ‘Fighting Injustice’ are available here to download or on CD via Bandcamp).


