A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, December 6, 2016
The Profound Disappointment of Angela Merkel
Mass
killing, mass destruction of old societies and cities, induced-coups,
threats, fears, torture, the creation of huge and desperate human
movements, promotion and reward of terror as a covert policy tool, the
decline everywhere in the rule of law, extra-judicial killing on an
organized scale, a huge erosion in respect for international
institutions like the now much-debased UN, an endless and confusing
patchwork of lies told about terrible events – all while ignoring
genuinely terrible situations like those in Palestine or in Saudi Arabia
or in Turkey.
( December 6, 2016, Boston, Sri Lanka Guardian) Anyone
who says she admires Hillary Clinton, as Angela Merkel has said, plainly
invites revulsion if not contempt. The lack of judgment broadcast by
such words strikes the mind like a grating noise. Clinton’s record of
behavior literally stinks to high heaven, much as a pile of corpses left
to rot in the hot sun, and, as it happens, there are a great many
rotting corpses in Clinton’s history.
What an immense disappointment Merkel is. Intelligent and well educated
with an appealing, fairly benign face, but, wait, am I describing Merkel
or, in fact, Obama? It turns out not to matter. They are a pair of
malignant soul mates born thousands of miles apart who conspired later
in life to bring the world a great deal of unhappiness.
Merkel has been de facto leader of Europe during an extremely
challenging period, one demanding real statesmanship. Instead, she has
provided attitudes and short-term fixes married to complete acceptance
of the most destructive American policies possible. Her policies have
alienated large numbers of her own people and, almost more importantly,
contributed mightily to the weakening of loyalties in Europe – not a
record of which to be proud.
Unfortunately, during the period of her Chancellorship, there have been
no other European leaders of stature and ability to balance or oppose
her. Absolutely none. Britain had the flabby joke of David Cameron who
collapsed his own house of cards through sheer political incompetence.
France had the absurd Francois Hollande, an impossibly pompous man with
not a single achievement to his credit, a parody of a French President,
certainly the worst leader in modern French history.
So, Europe at a time when America put great new stresses and demands
upon it for its own selfish reasons had no leadership worth mentioning.
All the major figures were content with accommodating America’s harsh
and destructive initiatives. Well, I do think there is something to be
said for the dictum that history is biography.
Everyone involved has suffered for Merkel’s attitudes and whims. Europe
simply could not have done much worse. The press so glibly speaks of the
rise of the political Right in Europe and in America, but what we
really see on both continents is public reaction to years of blundering
policies causing vast misery in many places.
You cannot support America’s destruction of the Middle East without
accepting its direct consequences both in massive migrations of
terrified people and in the rise of terror by relatively powerless young
men wanting revenge for what has been done to them, their families and
homes. Yet this is precisely what Angela Merkel has tried to do, trying
to avoid inevitable, destructive consequences of stupid acts she has
supported. Having never raised her voice against what America was doing,
Merkel decided to deal with some of the consequences by playing the
grandmotherly figure who welcomes an avalanche of refugees, seemingly
not appreciating for a second what that means on the streets of her own
country.
No decent person is against organized, peaceful immigration or against
giving assistance to desperate refugees. There is an ethical obligation
for both as well as some sound economic reasons. But if a truck, set to
deliver two hundred gallons of fuel oil to your home’s heating system,
pumps instead two thousand gallons, you suddenly have a disturbing,
costly, and dangerous situation. The analogy is actually quite
inadequate for what has happened in some places with armies of terrified
people fleeing America’s imposed-horrors.
Merkel, realizing what her support of America’s destruction in Libya,
Syria, and other places has wrought, tried setting the example of a
benign figure ready to help everyone, a kind of bonhomie approach to
what was a totally-avoidable catastrophe. The impossibility of this
should have been seen, but it was not. Too many extremely-different
refugees – different in language, customs, religion, wealth, and
politics – cannot be absorbed quickly or peacefully by any country, and
perhaps that is even more true of relatively old and homogeneous
societies such as Germany.
We like to speak of xenophobia with contempt, but in the gritty real
lives of vast populations everywhere on the planet, it is a reality just
as much as backward religious practices, which cannot be wished away.
True xenophobia, indeed, much resembles fundamentalist religion in that
it is an expression of superstitious instincts, deeply-rooted instincts
whose origins go beyond mere learned behaviors. Just try asking highly
religious people to set aside their feelings for completely different
newcomers, the example coming to mind of the Ultra-Orthodox in Israel
and their “take” on others. It is possible only in the imagination.
But xenophobia is only part of the mix, despite the claims of a
superficial mainstream press, and I am not just speaking of it. We
promote nationalism and national unity in every Western country with
flags, anthems, pledges, holiday customs, uniforms, speeches, parades,
even laws, and then some leaders seem to expect their people, almost on
command, to turn their backs on all the lifelong indoctrination and
embrace sudden, great change? It simply cannot be done.
As with anything else you may care to discuss, the time to act is before
a great problem or crisis has been created. Preventative health care is
no less valuable for nations than it is for individuals. The leaders of
Europe should have seen what America’s fanatical crusade was going to
do and opposed it, forcefully, before it was started. In doing so,
Europe would have been strengthened instead of diminished as it has
been., to say nothing of preventing the death and maiming of millions in
the Middle East. Instead they quietly supported it and even donated
resources to the insane efforts of America’s Grande Armée in the Middle
East.
Merkel’s contribution to disaster goes further, to her relations with
one of the planet’s genuine madman-leaders, Netanyahu. She has been
selling him sophisticated submarines at knock-down prices for years.
Only recently they agreed to three more of them in a deal which has
Netanyahu being examined in Israel for criminal activity. I think it
fair to ask, too, why a sardine-sized country needs a fleet of
sophisticated submarines, some or all of which are widely rumored to be
outfitted with nuclear-armed cruise missiles? Does that make sense to
anyone other than Merkel, Netanyahu, Clinton, and Obama? Does that
contribute to stability in the Middle East? And why doesn’t the
excruciating injustice of Israel’s occupation and regular theft of land
enter into considerations?
Germany’s taking a million refugees is roughly equivalent to America’s
taking four million. It does not take a great imagination to see what
the results of such a massive, short-term influx would be. Moreover,
never mind Donald Trump, there has been no American government, ever,
willing to accept such numbers at one time. Indeed, had America’s recent
governments demonstrated the slightest sense of responsibility for what
they had caused, they would have taken extraordinary steps for the
refugees, but they did not. Instead, they encouraged measures like
Merkel’s response, which, in terms of total numbers involved in the
human catastrophe, is necessarily pathetic.
But, if you read enough history, you will know it has always been part
of the American government’s character to do what as it pleases in the
world with little or no regard for the consequences, so long as those
consequences are on foreign shores. It is an attitude bred in a people
who too often feel they can have it all and have it now and a people who
have the illusion, generated both in commercial advertising and in
fundamentalist Christianity, of endless youth with all its happy
irresponsibility. It is something which actually marks America as
especially unsuitable for enlightened world leadership, while it is the
very quality demonic figures such as Kissinger or Brzezinski regarded as
useful to their twisted international purposes.
Merkel quickly learned what she had done was a terrible political
mistake. Consequences were quick, so she backtracked, never a dignified
behavior for a national leader. But more than that, Merkel, realizing
what the consequences might be of a few million more refugees
temporarily encamped in Turkey continuing on into Europe, was quick to
strike a deal with another of our planet’s most unscrupulous and
dangerous leaders, the madman who rules Turkey, Erdogan. She agreed to
pay him several billion Euros to keep the refugees in their massive
Turkish camps.
This was not just a highly unethical deal, it should have been seen for
the ongoing danger it represented, especially in view of Europe’s
general relations with Erdogan and its confused efforts to deal with his
many demands, ranging from visa-free travel in Europe for Turks to full
membership in the EU. Again, American policy had created a huge problem
by treating Turkey, an undemocratic country with limited respect for
human rights and one for some years ruled by a madman, as an
indispensable ally against Russia, so the EU to this day feels it must
accommodate that ugly reality in all its policies.
Obviously, a country in the state we see in Turkey – constant war and
terror against the Kurds, serious government suppression of free speech
and activities, assassinations, widespread Muslim fundamentalism, and
now new waves of repression following a failed coup – is in no shape to
qualify for EU membership under the EU’s own requirements, which at
least struggle to be faithful to Enlightenment principles.
Erdogan, never one to be shy about what he wants, has already threatened
publicly to “open the gates” if the EU does not proceed in treating his
demands appropriately. So, Merkel’s dirty deal with the devil is
seriously threatened and becomes just one more source of uncertainty and
instability. It is not a promising situation.
I believe Merkel was permanently scarred by growing up in East Germany
and likely harbors both inordinate fear of Russia and slavish admiration
for America, neither attitude being warranted in the least today. Her
mental landscape possibly includes images of Andropov versus Jimmy
Stewart, but policy built on fantasy and fears is bad policy, always.
The Bush-Obama years have been, in so far as foreign policy goes, about
as stupidly and blunderingly destructive as Lyndon Johnson’s bull-headed
insistence on fighting a major war in Vietnam. Johnson ended by killing
about 3 million people, generating instability and misery, dividing
America itself, and achieving nothing worth achieving. Bush-Obama have
killed at least a couple of million, generated instability and misery,
divided the countries of Europe, also achieving nothing worth achieving.
There is not one part of the vast sphere America has arrogantly viewed
as its area of influence that has not been made worse by Bush-Obama
policies.
Mass killing, mass destruction of old societies and cities,
induced-coups, threats, fears, torture, the creation of huge and
desperate human movements, promotion and reward of terror as a covert
policy tool, the decline everywhere in the rule of law, extra-judicial
killing on an organized scale, a huge erosion in respect for
international institutions like the now much-debased UN, an endless and
confusing patchwork of lies told about terrible events – all while
ignoring genuinely terrible situations like those in Palestine or in
Saudi Arabia or in Turkey.
Apart from the horrors Merkel has implicitly or explicitly embraced and
apart from the anger and disruptions and economic hardship her embrace
has meant for Europe – America’s arbitrary and unwarranted sanctions
against Russia have cost the German and French economies literally
billions which America smilingly allows them to pay – one look at a map
of Europe tells you just part of the reason why her views are so utterly
counter-productive.
For scores of reasons, the future of Europe is in a cooperative and
close relationship with Russia. It just cannot be otherwise, although,
if you are determined to waste enough resources, impoverishing to some
degree your own people through decreased trade and increased military
waste, you can hold the inevitable off for quite a while. Look at
America’s ten years of sheer insanity in Vietnam if you doubt for a
moment that it is possible for a great country to do absolutely
pointless and insanely costly things. Well, another insane and costly
crusade is exactly the course America has been on in recent years, and
leaders like Merkel have served as the most willing helpers in the task.
Obama and his political associate, Hillary Clinton, are total failures
as figures of principle and as leaders, and Merkel very much resembles
them, even down to the pathetic recent appeal she is using with German
voters in anticipation of 2017 elections. She has imported wholesale
Hillary’s squalid, 1950s-style claim that Russia threatens the integrity
of elections, her empty claims being just an effort to stoke-up fears
to get what she wants.
And then there are the remarkably empty and pretentious words she wrote in her official letter to President-elect Trump:
“Germany and America are united by shared values: through democracy, freedom, respect for the right and dignity of every individual, irrespective of origin, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation or political attitude. On the basis of these values, I would like to offer you a close cooperation between the governments of our countries.”
No clear-thinking person can accept such words as anything but
hypocritical establishment claptrap – the kind of phony stuff just
rejected by the American people. There is not a sincere phrase contained
in the paragraph, just an arrogant assumption of moral loftiness and a
presumption of setting standards for future relations. Can any
thoughtful reader not sense almost an insult in the words? Insufferable
stuff coming, as it does, from someone who never lifted a finger, except
to assist, in the killing of tens of thousands of women and their
families in half a dozen lands.
Trump will not do everything right, I know, but Merkel has done almost
nothing right, much as her admired friends, Hillary Clinton and Barack
Obama.