A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, June 26, 2017
The Sri Lanka Campaign is deeply concerned by recent attempts by senior
government of Sri Lanka officials to intimidate Attorney at Law, Mr
Lakshan Dias – a vital and irreplaceable voice within the human rights
community who has worked tirelessly in support of detainees held under
Sri Lanka’s draconian Prevention of Terrorism Act, as well as asylum
seekers who have been deported back to the country. Unaddressed, these
attempts could have a chilling effect on the freedom of expression of
members of the judiciary and civil society at large. Without a quick
change of course by the government, they may also help pave the way for
further violent attacks against Sri Lanka’s minority communities.
The incidents in question followed an appearance by Mr Dias on the
popular Sri Lankan talk show ‘Aluth Parlimenthuwa’ on Derana TV on
14 June, in which he stated that 195 attacks and other types of
harassment against Christians had occurred since the beginning of 2015.
These figures were drawn from credible research by
the National Christian Evangelical Alliance of Sri Lanka (NCEASL) –
research based partly on police statistics, and echoed in the findings
of other organisations who have examined this issue. Mr Dias’s remarks were made during a discussion about the latest spate of anti-Muslim violence which has swept the island, allegedly instigated and orchestrated by extreme Buddhist nationalists, including monks affiliated with the Bodu Bala Sena (BBS – “Buddhist Power Force”).
The response to the remarks was two-fold. First, President Sirisena,
speaking on state television on 16 June stated that he had inquired
about the comments with the strongly pro-government Roman Catholic
Cardinal Malcolm Ranjith,
who had reportedly told the President that he was unaware of any such
attacks. In and of itself, that statement is a remarkably brazen
whitewash. As recently as 31 May, Sri Lanka’s Human Rights Commission
had written a letter to
the President bringing to his attention recent attacks against
Christians. It is also a deeply irresponsible one. In the context of
ongoing violent attacks, they are words that will no doubt risk further
emboldening perpetrators against critics such as Mr Dias, and generate
even more fear and self-censorship among others like him who wish to
speak out.
Second, on 17 June the Sri Lankan Minister of Justice, Wijeyadasa
Rajapakshe made an appearance on a state television channel in which he
dismissed the figures cited by Mr Dias and threatened to remove him from
the legal profession if he did not apologise to the nation within 24
hours. The emptiness of this threat – for the Minister of Justice lacks
the power to take such action – underscores its political nature, and
raises serious questions about respect for due process and the rule of
law. Any attempt to arbitrarily and unlawfully interfere with Mr Dias’s
right to practise his profession would clearly run counter to
international human rights standards. This includes the United Nations
Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, which state that
lawyers “have the right to take part in public discussion of matters
concerning the law, the administration of justice and the promotion and
protection of human rights… without suffering professional restrictions
by reason of their lawful action”.
Responding to government officials, civil society activists issued a statement earlier
this week in which they made clear that they “view the targeting of Mr
Dias as an attempt to silence activism”, and expressed “serious concern
about the threat posed to Mr Lakshan Dias’s legal career and his
safety”. Today, protestors gathered at
Fort Railway Station to voice their solidarity with Mr Dias and to urge
the Justice Minister to row back on his remarks. Meanwhile, and as if
to underline the crossroads at which the government of Sri Lanka now
stands on this issue, extraordinary reports emerged
of the arrest and release on bail – twice – of Gnanasara Thero, the
leader of the BBS who has evaded arrest for over a month despite
multiple police warrants.
The government now faces a stark choice as to the handling of these twin
issues, a choice with decisive consequences: it can help stem the tide
of recent violence against minorities, by acknowledging its grave scale
as outlined by individuals like Mr Dias, and ensuring meaningful action
is taken against perpetrators. Or it can provide a concrete guarantee
that the future will repeat the past, by continuing to dismiss those who
dare to recognise the problem, and giving further space to those who
are at the root of it. On the third anniversary of anti-Muslim rioting
in Aluthgama which
left 3 citizens dead and many more injured, it is a choice which should
weigh heavily on the minds of Sri Lanka’s leaders.