A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, December 20, 2017
FACT SHEET: SRI LANKA AND GSP +

What is GSP +?
GSP+ stands for Generalised Scheme of Preferences Plus. It is part of
the EU’s wider GSP regulation, which also includes the standard GSP and
Everything But Arms (EBA). GSP+ allows eligible countries to pay no
duties on a wide range of exports to the EU.
The countries currently benefiting from GSP+ are Armenia, Bolivia, Cabo
Verde, Kyrgyzstan, Mongolia, Pakistan, Paraguay, the Philippines and Sri
Lanka. GSP+ status is dependent upon the ratification and
implementation of 27 international conventions on human and labour
rights, environmental protection, and good governance. The scheme helps
vulnerable countries “assume the special burdens and responsibilities
resulting from the ratification of these conventions”.1
Does Sri Lanka Currently have GSP + status ?
Yes. In July 2016, the Sri Lankan government applied for GSP+ status. Its application was successful and it became a beneficiary of the programme on 19 May 2017.
Does Sri Lanka has previous experience with GSP +
Yes. Sri Lanka has benefitted from the standard GSP since the scheme’s inception, and it began to benefit from GSP+ on 15 July 2005. This occurred in the wake of the 2004 tsunami in Sri Lanka. However, on 15 August 2010, the EU suspended Sri Lanka’s GSP+ status. Thus, between 2010 and 2017, Sri Lanka only benefited from the standard GSP programme.1
Why did Sri Lanka lost GSP +?
The EU’s decision to withdraw GSP+ benefits from Sri Lanka was based on
the findings of a European Commission investigation that identified
shortcomings in the implementation of three UN human rights
conventions:2
1. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR);
2. Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC);
3. Convention Against Torture (CAT).
For each convention, the EU noted significant issues. In regards to the
CAT, for example, the EU noted that Sri Lanka had a strong record of
adopting legislation to criminalise torture, but found that there
remained “widespread” use of torture by the police and armed forces. 3
Before suspending Sri Lanka’s GSP+ status, the Commission notified the
country of the shortcomings. It then set out a six-month time period for
Sri Lanka to address the issues. However, Sri Lanka’s former government
failed to respond to the Commission’s requests. No other GSP+
beneficiary has lost its status because of non-compliance.
However, two beneficiaries of the standard GSP programme have had their
statuses temporarily withdrawn due to “serious and systematic violations
of labour rights”. 4 The EU suspended Myanmar in 1997 and Belarus in
2006. Myanmar regained its GSP status in 2013 due to demonstrated reform
efforts, but Belarus is yet to regain its status.
Why did Sri Lanka regain GSP+ status in 2017?
In January 2017, the European Commission recommended to the European Parliament that Sri Lanka regain its GSP+ status. In explaining its decision, the Commission highlighted the political transition that had begun following the 2015 presidential and parliamentary elections in Sri Lanka. The Commission stated that the key grounds for its decision were 1) the political will displayed by the current government and 2) the steps it had taken toward restoring democracy, good governance and respect for human rights.5
Does regaining GSP+ men Sri Lanka has fully satisfied GSP+ implementation requirements?
No. The EU is clear that entry into GSP+ does not mean that the
country’s implementation of the 27 required conventions is fully
satisfactory. Instead, the EU sees GSP+ status as a way to encourage
further progress towards the full implementation of those
conventions.6 GSP+ thus serves as a platform for the EU to engage with
the countries on problematic areas.
“Granting GSP+ to Sri Lanka […] is a vote of confidence from the
European Union that the Sri Lankan Government will maintain the progress
it has made in implementing the international conventions. At the same
time, no one is pretending that the situation is perfect”.
–EU Trade Commissioner Cecilia Malmström
How well has Sri Lanka performed since its re-entry into GSP+
A delegation of the European Parliament made an official visit to Sri Lanka in November 2017, where it expressed concern. The delegation noted that the “progress achieved has been slower than originally hoped, but that the foundations for that progress were now mostly in place”. 7 The delegation stated that a number of important issues still need to be addressed, in particular revisions of the Prevention of Terrorism Act were required.
How can Sri Lanka maintain GSP+ status?
To remain eligible for GSP+, Sri Lanka must continue to make clear
progress towards the implementation of the required conventions. It must
also carefully follow the GSP+ monitoring process. 5
If Sri Lanka continues to make the necessary progress, it will be able
to benefit from GSP+ until it achieves Upper Middle Income country
status. Based on current development trends, the EU suggests that Sri
Lanka will be eligible for GSP+ until at least 2021.8
How important is the GSP+ for Sri Lankan economy?
The EU is Sri Lanka’s largest export market. It accounts for almost a
third of the country’s exports. In 2016, the total value of trade
between the two countries amounted to almost €4 billion, and EU imports
from Sri Lanka reached €2.6 billion.9 Textiles accounted for nearly 60%
of EU imports that year. 10
The removal of import duties provided a total of immediate benefits
worth more than €300 million a year. If Sri Lanka uses GSP+ effectively
to diversify its economy, the economic importance of the scheme could be
even greater.
Published December 2017
1 European Commission, “The EU’s New Generalised Scheme of Preferences”, December 2012.
2 European Commission, “Report on the Findings of the Investigation
with Respect to the Effective Implementation of Certain Human Rights
Conventions in Sri Lanka”, 10 October 2009.
3 Ibid, para. 85.
4 European Commission, “The EU’s New Generalised Scheme of Preferences”.
5 European Commission, “COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT: Report on
assessment of the application for GSP+ by Sri Lanka”, Brussels, 11
January 2017, pg. 10.
6 Delegation of the European Union to Sri Lanka and the Maldives,
“The EU Grants Enhanced Market Access for Sri Lanka as a Reform
Incentive”, Colombo, 16 May 2017.
7 European Union External Action, “Delegation of the European
Parliament Pays Official Visit to Sri Lanka”, Colombo, 2 November 2017.
8 Delegation of the European Union to Sri Lanka and the Maldives,
“The EU Grants Enhanced Market Access for Sri Lanka as a Reform
Incentive”.
9 Ibid. 10European Commission, Directorate-General for Trade,
“European Union, Trade in Goods with Sri Lanka”, 17 Nov. 2017, pg. 6.
(-Democracy Reporting International )
Factsheet-Monitoring-Process_2017-10-12.pdf by Thavam on Scribd

