Dr. Jude Lal Fernando-16 MARCH 2018
It
was just a road rage! Two vehicles end up at a petrol station after
one was prevented from overtaking the other on a narrow road in the
Central Province of Sri Lanka. Soon, a verbal dispute escalates into a
physical altercation. Many such disputes end peacefully and some others
with verbal abuse of each other. A few end up in physical attack of each
other. This particular road rage fell into the last category in which
one person succumbed to serious wounds after a week in the Teaching
Hospital in Kandy. Four were arrested and remanded by the police.
This ordinary, but tragic incident gained a massive racial and religious
overtone no sooner the death of the injured person was announced. He
happened to be a Sinhala Buddhist and the four other men happened to be
Muslims. Their religious backgrounds fitted the Sinhala supremacist
narrative neatly; ‘Muslims have killed a Sinhala Buddhist’. This news
spread like wildfire across the region and far beyond where Muslims live
as a numerical minority amongst the majority Sinhala Buddhists.
As part of funeral arrangements up to several kilometres of the road
leading to the small village of the deceased person were decorated with
white flags by the villagers in the area. Multiple Sinhala
ultra-nationalist groups across the country led by the Buddhist monks
flocked to the region and went on looting and then
burning Muslim houses, shops and
mosques, and vandalized public roads whilst looking for Muslims
travelling on vehicles. One person was killed after been trapped in a
shop that was set on fire and another died of a heart attack caused by
the trauma. All these happened in the presence of the Sri Lanka's elite
police commandos and armed forces. The government
declared a state of emergency all
throughout the country, imposed curfew in the particular region,
deployed military in thousands and blocked social media. Yet the
reports, including footages of CCTV cameras installed at houses and
shops, from the region revealed that the Sinhala gangs mostly led by the
Buddhist monks roamed openly day and night whilst
expanding their attacks from Muslim
village to village. Many,
including the former President Mahinda Rajapaksa, accused the current
Maithripala-Ranil regime of inaction or not implementing law and order
promptly. The Sinhala liberal intelligentsia blamed the government of
not curbing the 'extremists'. It has also being portrayed as communal
violence; a Muslim-Sinhala riot as anti-Tamil pogroms were coded as
Sinhala-Tamil riots.
MONKS INCITING VIOLENCE IN THELDENIYA, KANDY, SRI LANKA - MARCH 05, 2018
Would proper implementation of law and order have stopped another
episode of anti-Muslim attacks on the island? If so, how come the
Sinhala gangs could engage in their violence in the presence of police
and military amidst curfew? Does this happen simply because of some
extremists who are disconnected from an 'inefficient', but 'neutral'
state?
Institutionalised racism
The most gruesome and wide spread pogrom against a non-Sinhala national
community in the history of the island took place in July 1983 against
the Tamils with the overt and covert support of both the then government
politicians and law enforcement institutions. According to widely
accepted figures over 3000 Tamils were killed and half a million were
displaced within a week. Up until today not a single person has been
charged. The end of the 35 year war was marked by the Sri Lankan
state’s (led by the former president Rajapaksa) military victory over
the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) that became a formidable
political force amongst the Eelam Tamils in the North and East
particularly after 1983 anti-Tamil pogrom. This military victory was
heavily backed by the UK, USA and India. It claimed, according to the UN
reports, lives of over 70,000 Tamils and asserted Sinhala supremacist
politics in an unprecedented way throughout the entire island. The need
of the global and regional powers who aided the war was to secure the
unitary Sri Lankan state against the LTTE who led the sub-state of Tamil
Eelam. Both the leaders of the former and the present regimes have been
competing with each other in promising the Sinhala masses that they
would not betray the security forces to any tribunal that would
investigate the mass atrocities committed against the Tamils. The US-led
UNHRC Resolutions openly upheld the unitary state structure by
endorsing the article 2 of the Sri Lankan constitution which calls to
safeguard 'independence, sovereignty, unity and the territorial
integrity' while failing even to mention that the 'Tamils' were the
victims. John Kerry, the former US Secretary of State, went even further
when he stated that transitional justice has to be sought whilst
safeguarding ‘heroism and professionalism’ of the Sri Lankan security
forces.
It is against this background that one has to understand the current
phase of anti-Muslim attacks on the island. Attacking non Sinhala -
Buddhist communities is not a crime, but an act of Sinhala heroism! This
mindset is not an extremist position, but an institutionalized one.
Without this supremacist ideology the institution of unitary state
cannot be maintained. In such a setting, law and order are on the side
of the Sinhala supremacists and not on the side of the Tamil and Muslim
victims. The hollow slogan ‘we are all Sri Lankans’ is simply a
political rhetoric which is meant to conceal the true character of the
Sri Lankan state.
BBS & Islamophobia
The recent anti-Muslim violence is the third major attack that has taken
place in the aftermath of the Sri Lankan state’s military victory over
the Tamil Tigers in 2009. The Muslims had been already vilified during
the military campaign against the Tamils (2005-2009) by the Sinhala
ultra-nationalist political party, Jathika Hela Urumaya (JHU), who
accused the Muslims of ‘occupying’ and ‘defiling’ the Sinhala Buddhist
heritage in the Eastern Province. The JHU has been a coalition partner
of both the previous and the present regimes. However, when the war
unfolded the main enemies were the Eelam Tamil people. Muslims were not
specifically targeted due to tactical caluclations.
In the aftermath of the war, another racist Buddhist group Bodu Bala
Sena (BBS) was formed - with the covert support of the regime – which
developed close ties with similar ultra-nationalist Buddhist groups in
Burma and Thailand. The BBS embraced the Western Islamophobia immensely
and followed the same fascist arguments of the far right groups in
Europe and USA against Islam and refugees. The group led a massive
island-wide anti-Muslim campaign mobilizing the Sinhalese against Halal
and to boycott Muslim-run business. Whilst large scale land grab,
militarization and Sinhala Buddhicisation of the North and East were
being sponsored by the state as part of the military victory over the
Eelam Tamils, Islamophobia made its way deep into the Sinhala psyche in
the South. This made the Sri Lankan state further glued to the Western
imperialist complex which has found a new enemy in Islam, replacing the
'Communist Evil'.
A MOSQUE VANDALISED BY MOBS, DIGANA, KANDY - MARCH 06, 2018
The current phase of violence against the Muslims is part of the logic
of Sinhala supremacist politics upon which the Sri Lankan state has been
built since the British colonial times; reinforced after so-called
Independence in 1948 and further consolidated through the military
victory over the LTTE in 2009 which was called Second Independence. In
the 16th century, the Buddhists and Muslims fought together against the
Portuguese, the first Western colonizer of the island. In the beginning
of the British colonial period in the early 19th century, the Sinhalese
and Tamils resisted their coloniser together and also independently from
one another in their two distinct regions. However, later on as the
British constructed a single unitary political structure on the island,
the numerically majority Sinhalese were treated as a 'chosen race' and
the Tamils and Muslims were portrayed as invaders. It is this colonially
constructed supremacist mindset which has become the hallmark of the
Sri Lankan state.
'Unruly mobs' V 'disciplined troops'
In conclusion, the attacks on Muslims cannot be termed as part of
communal violence. Nor can these be simply a result of breakdown of law
and order or actions of extremist groups. ‘The Eelam Tamils who demanded
self-determination have been militarily defeated. Let us teach a lesson
to the Muslims now’ - This is not the mindset of a few extremist
Sinhala Buddhists. It is solely a reflection of the way which the Sri
Lankan state has been structured; its unitary character, exclusivist
nationalist ideology and the support it gets from global powers. These
are the constitunet elements that form the power base of the state and
condition the the Sinhala mindest. In return, the Sinhalese expect the
state to be on their side against the non-Sinhalese. That is why the
Sinhala ultra-nationalist groups demand the regime to release those who
were arrested for attacking the Muslims in the Central Province just as
they claim the right to colonize the North and East.
The same monks who are engaged in land grab from the Tamils and Muslims
in the Eastern Province were involved in leading the anti-Muslim attacks
in the Central Province. The Tamils have been subjugated militarily and
denied of their nationhood. Total impunity has been granted to the
direct perpetrators. Now the Muslims have been despised, attacked and
left without any justice. This common fate of oppression creates a
common ground between the Tamils and Muslims to resist the state. Such
resistance carries a potential even to unshackle the Sinhalese from
their house of bondage which has been created for them by their Slave
Masters.
Regimes can be changed, but all new regimes will continue to stand by
violent perpetrators to protect the Sinhala-dominated unitary state as
long as the racial hierarchies and oppressive structures remain intact.
Therefore, the
active participation of STF commandosin
perpetrating violence against hill country Muslims is neither an
aberration nor a failure to uphold law and order, but a routine brutal
reflection of an institutionalised racist mindset which gained a new
momentum in the aftermath of crushing the Tamil resistance. The 'unruly
mob' vs. 'disciplined troops' is a false binary. Both are bound by a
common ideological thread that legitimises the violent subjugation of
non-Sinhala Buddhists.
The Sri Lankan state is Sinhala by language, Buddhist by religion and
colonial in its political structure and ideology. It is this state which
has been ‘saved’ from the LTTE by a global alliance, which revitalised
the Sinhala Buddhist belief in their ethno-religious superiority over
the others living in the island. Following the military victory in 2009
unitary state has been consolidated as never before and Sinhala
supremacism has reached its peak.
Hence, anti-Muslim attacks are not a betrayal of the so-called war
victory or a 'hard-won peace'. It is an inevitable outcome of that
genocidal military triumph.
© JDS