A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, April 18, 2018
Kill, But Not With Chemical Weapons
The one hundred or so missile attacks by the US, UK and France on Syria sent one clear message not only to Syria but
to every other tyrant, including those on the American side. That
message was: you can kill and massacre your people in any way you want
as our civilized friends do in Yemen and Palestine, but not with
chemical weapons, because that is barbaric. What about, may we ask, when
Saddam Hussain, when he was a “son of our bitch”, gassed thousands of
Kurds? Well, that was in the past and Saddam has been hanged in any
case. How more hypocritical can one become in playing the power game in
international politics?
A tyrant is a tyrant whether that tyrant is one’s friend or enemy; a
massacre is massacre and killing is killing, whether those massacres and
killings are committed using conventional or unconventional weapons.
But to pick and choose when and where to respond against a particular
tyrant and a particular massacre by the so called defenders of freedom
and civilization shows the height of political hypocrisy. Had the so
called NATO humanitarian interventionists intervened early and prevented
the escalation of Syrian uprising, long before the Russians were
invited by Assad, the world would not have witnessed the almost daily
horror scenes shown by the media. Unfortunately, for the champions of
NATO, Syria does not possess oil in plenty as Libya does. Also, such
intervention may have raised embarrassing questions about US-backed
Saudi bombings in Yemen.
Assad may have used chemical weapons, but the evidence for it is only
circumstantial. Even a few months earlier there was similar charges
levelled against him but credible journalism exposed the canard. To go
back further in history, before bombing Iraq Bush administration told
the world that Saddam Hussain was roasting babies in the oven and that
he had acquired a nuclear device that could explode within forty-five
minutes. None of those accusations proved correct. What
we have seen is the repeated tactic that once the US manufactures a
falsehood and get its media to spread it, US allies fall for it and
joins in the action that follows.
Russia
has warned that “there will be payback”. One can be rest assured that
Russia’s response will not be militaristic. Here is a lesson that
tyrants like Assad should learn when seeking support from another
superpower. No two superpowers will clash against each other militarily
on behalf of a client state because that would be suicidal. Even in the
1962 Cuban missile crisis, Soviet Union withdrew at the last minute to
avoid a hot war with US. If USSR could not go to war with US in support
of a foremost communist client, will Russia go to war with it now on
behalf of a Muslim Syria? Superpowers have their own agendas drawn in
their own national interests. This is why Israel has developed its own
defence capabilities without having to depend on any outside power in
times of need. Iran and North Korea are now trying to imitate Israel’s
lead in this respect.
The Syrian crisis must end, and end soon, to save the lives of millions
of innocent people. For five years the Syrians are caught in a cycle of
violence to which the vast majority of them is not a party. The
situation is now becoming even more complicated with the intervention of
Turkey, which is determined to exterminate the Kurdish militia. That
militia is backed by the US, and Turkey is a US ally as well as a member
of NATO. However, in Syria, Turkey believes that a friend of a friend
is not necessarily a friend.
One
would have thought that the OIC, an international body with fifty-seven
Muslim countries as members, will have the resources and skill to
intervene and solve problems arising in and between Muslim countries.
Alas! Caught in the Shia-Sunni sectarian muddle between Iran and Saudi
Arabia, that body is as impotent as the divided UN. Once again, the
highly touted slogan “lslam the Answer”, raised by moderate and militant
Islamists in the 1980s, remains as hollow as ever.