A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, April 15, 2018
Wag The Dog
Every few Years, the US will find an oil Rich nation in the Middle-East
to bomb and destabilize no matter what the reasons are(Iraq by Bush;
Libya ruined by Obama). Media in the US will never talk about the
suffering of innocent civilians in those invasions or destabilization
efforts that are a direct result of those interventions. Instead, the
heinous gas attack in Syria will cause the media to echo the words of
the administration without asking the hard questions. Thus, it appears
the new air strikes in Syria are another clear cut “WAG THE DOG”
scenario; Trump crowed “mission accomplished” echoing the infamous words
of George W Bush about the strikes.
Russians who along with Iran are helping Syria fight ISIS terrorism turned a blind eye-wink-wink about the strikes on April 13th,
2018; they were probably informed of the targets by US to avoid an
escalation of the crisis into a bigger conflict; both sides have ground
troops and Russia has significant military assets in Syria as well.
Bigger question is are these strikes a precursor to a much sought after
war with Iran aided and abetted by other regional close allies of the
USA. If there was real solid proof that Syria’s brutal dictator was
behind the alleged gas attack why was it not presented to the UN
Security Council? What was the haste? Is it illegal for a nation to
attack a sovereign nation without sanction from the UNSC
In 1962, National Security Advisor McGeorge Bundy informed President
John F. Kennedy that U.S. surveillance aircraft had discovered the
presence of Soviet missiles in Cuba, just 90 miles from American soil.
It was the start of the Cuban Missile Crisis, which brought the world to
the brink of nuclear war. US produced facts, satellite imagery and
other proof to the UN. US Secretary to the UN, Adlai Stevenson presented
irrefutable proof of Russian weapons in Cuba and confronted the USSR;
and notorious shoe thumping Nikita Khruschev blinked and withdrew the
weapons to avoid a nuclear holocaust. US won that round.
In 2003 of course, the US produced false evidence to the UN via General
Colin Powell to start that ill-fated adventure. “Mission Accomplished”
that totally rendered the old checks-and-balances apart and the
unintended consequence was making Shia Iran(90% Shia) the dominant
strategic decision maker in the Shia majority Iraq (The Muslim
population of Iraq is approximately 60%–65%Shi’a, 15%–20% Arab Sunni
and 17%) Sunni Kurdish).
This time there was nothing in the way of evidence (real or fake)
presented to the UN; nor was the issue debated rationally. Why was that?
Why the eagerness to punish the bad boy Assad whose military really
poses no threat to US, Israel nor Saudi Arabia? This was probably a way
to send a message to Iran and its Lebanese ally Hezbollah who also now
have a strong presence in Syria helping the Shia minority government of
Assad defeat ISIS terrorists.
What is the future in oil rich Middle-East when big powers get to test
their weapons with impunity, so they can sell more to fearful oil rich
potentates?
Donald Trump became the first US President to choose Saudi Arabia(KSA)
as his first foreign destination upon taking office. Immediate effect
was the sale of nearly $US110 billion — that’s about $147 billion —
worth of military equipment to effective immediately. The
deal included tanks, combat ships and missile defence systems, as well
as radar, communications and cybersecurity technology. The New York
Times is also reporting that the deal includes the sale of
precision-guided munitions, which the Obama administration had stopped
because it was worried they would be used to bomb civilians in
Yemen. The United States is Saudi Arabia’s main military supplier and
it has military stockpiles and bases there.
KSA is where the main Wahabi ideology that created ISIS and Al Qaeda
types emanate. Yet, recently Trump drooled about being able to sell
billions of dollars of high dollar item weapons systems to them. He told
the Crown Prince who visited USA with a high powered delegation, that
he would love to sell more weapons to KSA. Arguably KSA’s main
ideological enemy in Islam is Iran. Iran has shown a belligerent
attitude towards KSA and Israel. Therefore, it benefits the US to sell
weapons, and make massive profits.
Why has Trump,(and Obama before him as well) keep silent when Saudi
Arabia (KSA) has been mentioned by humanitarian aid groups to be the
main culprit behind the large number of civilian deaths? Will the US
stop selling lethal weapons to Saudi Arabia? no. The proxy war between
Iran and KSA there has been a horrific tragedy for ordinary Yemenis.
Yet most Americans just believe and accept whatever its media tells it
to believe. Most of them have woeful knowledge of world geography or
geo-political facts. The graphic sums up the way they look at other
nations.
For instance, if today, the US media is to demonize Sri Lanka, and say
Sri Lanka has chemical weapons and helps jihadi terrorists,
automatically without even asking hard questions or pausing for a moment
to check if this is factual, the vast majority will support bombing it
because it will become a “bad guy”. This is the mentality because most
of them cannot locate the contentious nations reported in the media on a
map.
That is the sad reality despite America’s prowess and technologically
superior non-pareil military might. It is very easy to tell the
frightened people(ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks launched by Al
Qaeda; 15 of those terrorists were Saudis and none were Iraqis, but 80%
of the American public was made to believe Saddam and Iraq(eye-rack) was
behind 9/11.
The call “we have enemies we need to strike because they are an imminent national security threat “is
an easy way to garner support for war; even if that so called enemy is
armed only with obsolete weapons, which US can overwhelm in a blink of
the eye ;like derelict Syrian weaponry that stands no chance.