A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Saturday, June 2, 2018
SRI LANKA’S RIGHT TO INFORMATION COMMISSION EXPRESSES IT CONCERNS ON PROPOSED AUDIT BILL
Issuing a media statement the Right to Information Commission of Sri
Lanka says that “the RTIC is concerned that a ‘chilling effect’ may be
created by this general prohibition. This concern is reinforced by the
fact that the Bill provides that any ‘member or person or qualified
auditor who communicates any such matter to any person or suffers or
permits any unauthorized person to have access to any books, papers or
other records relating to any such matter, commits an offence.’ General
prohibitions on information and the criminalization of information
disclosure that is in disobedience thereto are contrary to the letter
and spirit of the RTI Act.”
STATEMENT BY RIGHT TO INFORMATION COMMISSION ON PROPOSED AUDIT BILL
June 1st 2018
In accordance with its duty to secure the effective implementation of
Sri Lanka’s Right to Information Act, No 12 of 2016 (RTI Act) in Sri
Lanka, the Right to Information Commission (RTIC) emphasizes the
importance of upholding the public right to know which is a core
principle of the RTI Act.
It is reminded in this regard that the RTI Act is premised on the
principle of maximum disclosure while protecting specific interests
(national security, privacy, law and order etc). These interests are, in
turn, subjected to an overriding public interest test. As such, the RTI
Act does not place specific categories or classes of documents or the
functioning of specific offices beyond the reach of information
requesters.
Consequently draft laws currently in the public domain that proposes to
place selected state offices on an advantaged position as against others
and enforce general prohibitions on citizens asking for information on
the due and proper functioning of such offices raise legitimate concerns
as to whether this will create exclusive domains of privilege for those
offices.
In this regard, the Commission expresses its particular concern in
reference to clause 9 (1) (b) of the proposed Audit Bill (gazette issued
on 16.03.2018) and presently before Parliament which stipulates that
members of the Audit Service Commission, any person appointed to any
office under the Audit Act or any other person assisting any such person
for the purpose of carrying out the provisions under this Act or a
qualified auditor engaged by the Auditor General shall not disclose any
information received in the performance of duties until documentation in
that regard is placed before Parliament. The only exception will be
where there is a request of Parliament or an order of court.
The Bill proposed to afford this protection unconditionally, without any
assessment as to whether such a wide prohibition is necessary in a
democratic society, without due regard as to whether grave prejudice
will be caused by the release of information thereby and without any
time period being specified in regard to the potential presentation of
such report or statement before Parliament.
The RTIC is concerned that a ‘chilling effect’ may be created by this
general prohibition. This concern is reinforced by the fact that the
Bill provides that any ‘member or person or qualified auditor who
communicates any such matter to any person or suffers or permits any
unauthorized person to have access to any books, papers or other records
relating to any such matter, commits an offence.’ General prohibitions
on information and the criminalization of information disclosure that is
in disobedience thereto are contrary to the letter and spirit of the
RTI Act.
The RTIC emphasizes the fact that the precedent set by shielding some
offices and individuals from RTI in this manner will dilute the
victories gained for Sri Lankans through the enactment of a globally
recognized law, risk a gravely negative impact on the embryonic
development of the country’s Right to Information regime and discourage
largely positive tendencies evidenced so far by Public Authorities in
dismantling a decades-old culture of secrecy and denial of legitimate
information.
Issued on Order of the RTI Commission, Rooms 203-205, BMICH, Colombo 7, Sri Lanka, Ph/Fax; + 94 11 2691625 , http://www.rticommission.lk


