A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, June 10, 2018
Stop Gotabaya-Rex!
Choice of candidate a significant factor in defeating Gotabaya
-YPR-1.jpg)
Tinker, tailor, soldier, spy; now fiscal and financial virtuoso
Gotabaya’s candidature for the presidency has been announced with much
fanfare. All the backward forces of Sri Lankan society gathered at a
great event organised by an elitist-chauvinist outfit called Viyathmaga
in a resplendent hall to greet their new champion. Narrow nationalists
and Sinhala chauvinists were there; leaders of the Joint Opposition
attended; a sprinkling of the Dead Left deserted geriatric beds to put
in a showing. Vasudeva did not attend but tied himself in knots saying
one thing and then another according to the Daily Financial Times;
goodly numbers of businessmen salivating for spoils were there.
Understandably some fed up with Ranil’s pluperfect incompetence, stunned
by Sirisena’s treachery and mystified by the venality of presidential
skunks in car parks also drifted into the meeting.
Neo-populism has made sweeping gains in Europe and America. In Italy the
equivalent of the Bernie Sanders base and the Trump base have allied
and formed a government. It is possible that Lanka’s chauvinist
alt-right, petty-bourgeois populists, business clusters and retired
military-fascists thought it not too early to show their hand. Or maybe
the knives are out in Rajapaksa-Joint Opposition circles (the Dead Left
wants Chamal, crooks want Basil, chauvinist want Gotha), so it was
necessary to stake an early claim. The meeting was billed as the launch
of Gota’s economic programme; though GL Peries denied it, it was in fact
the launch of a presidential bid pending Mahinda’s endorsement. Why on
earth would one launch an economic programme except as the first step in
a presidential bid?
What did the sayings of this monetary, fiscal, financial and economic
genius add up to; prosaic platitudes, plain prose and banalities. Here’s
a sampling.
*The foremost priority is economic growth, the foundation and the cure for all ills.
*Growth will ensure the sustained prosperity and well-being of the people.
*Transforming the economy; futuristic policies; right people; dedicated execution.
*We will be driven by humans with power and many sided abilities.
*We will open up to foreign investors and international partners.
*We will safeguard sovereignty and cultural values.
So there is not much to it as an economic programme; no fiscal policy,
no debt reduction targets, no export strategy, no specific relationship
between state and capital, and no planning perspective; it was all piss
and wind. More interesting was what was missing from the speech of this
high member of the last government. Basil’s pilfering from every project
and contract; can the same people be restrained? Mahinda’s megalomaniac
outlays and how the same regime can avoid it again.
Aborting Gotabaya-Rex
Gotabaya-Rex (GR), a label suggested by a smartarse friend, can be
stopped, must be stopped, and not difficult to stop unless yahapalana
makes a fool of itself, again. Aye there’s the rub, folly has become a
habit. Not just Ranil and the damn fool UNP but even my comrades in the
January 8 Movement, as we call ourselves, had no clue what was coming on
February 10. I can say, not proudly but sadly, that I was the only one
in my circle (left, radicals and liberals) who saw impending defeat.
The
JVP was in cloud cuckoo land; the economic genius of
Ranil-Charitha-Malik-Eran-Harsha delivered a stillborn old-style-liberal
programme which it is now busy cremating; the TNA, "brilliant"
Sumanthiran included, could not see the flop of the new constitutional
project staring it in the face (how can we get a constitution when the
president undermines it at every turn?); and our wacky president lives
in never-never land. Lal Wijenayake has exposed in polite but no
uncertain terms that His Excellency is not excellent at telling the
truth. The aforementioned economic quintet, deep in slumber, couldn’t
see Modi’s state driven strategy delivering 7.7% growth, two years in a
row, just across the Palk Strait. The 100-day Programme was only a
transitional stabiliser before getting to serious business which never
came.
Yet GR can be stopped despite crummy yahapalana. Gota can be defeated
because voting is driven by ethnic prejudices. I have done this
arithmetic before but it bears repetition. (Those weak in arithmetic can
give algebra or calculus a try but they can’t subvert logic and
number). Unless Muslims and Tamils (Ceylon and Upcountry) catch suicidal
abstention-influenza they will vote 100% against Gota. That’s a good
20% of the population. Not all the Cardinal’s Hail Mary’s and novenas
will swing much of the Catholic vote. Counting down to fractions is
absurd but the broad picture is immutable; 23+% of the population, the
minorities, constitute an anti-Gota rock. Hence I contend that unless
Gota polls over two-thirds of the Sinhala-Buddhist (SB) vote (70% of the
population) his prospects are dim. (The UNP has never polled less than
25% of the SB vote; add the JVP and civil society). Ethnic account
keeping may make you sick, as it does me, but get real; this is Mother
Lanka in modern times, not Plato’s Republic.
Yet our yahapalana chaps are expert at snatching defeat from the jaws of
victory! There are two threats; mass abstentions as on February 10 when
one in four or one in five UNPers gave Ranil a kick in the butt and
abstained, second the tricky question of identifying the anti-Gota
candidate who can draw the largest support. At this point in time my
mind is a bit blank; I can conjure up only two names, Ranil and the
JVP’s Anura Kumara Dissanayake (AKD). I don’t think the Field Marshal is
a persuasive suitor though he has offered himself; better he goes head
to head with Mahinda in Kurunegala at a general election. I rule out a
surprise dark horse as in 2015 a second time; that cock won’t fight
again. This time the Rajapaksa slayer must come from active political
ranks and the SLFP’s offer, now howling like a cornered hyena in a car
park, is already kaput.
Both have weaknesses. Ranil has soiled his linen and muddied populist
waters, but to my mind this is less serious than yahapalana’s calamitous
inability to put a single Rajapaksa-era mega crook (Lalith W is small
change) behind bars. Mariano Rajoy was evicted as Spain’s PM because 29
of his party members were proved to be crooks; the new Malaysian
government will fix million-dollar mega-crook Najib Razak; last week I
gave examples where mega-crooks including Presidents have been nabbed
and convicted. Lanka’s at-cross-purposes yahapalana, its bovine
prosecutors and a soporific judiciary add up to a worse-than-useless
decoction. For better or for worse Ranil will bear the brunt of this at
the next election.
On the plus side, the UNP base and Muslims, Tamils and Catholics is a
sure-bet block vote against Gota (observe I prefer not to say for-Ranil
for reasons of accuracy). The minorities and a minority-of-the-majority
will defeat the majority-of-the-majority at the next presidential
election; that’s how it will be. That’s fine and how democracy sometimes
works. One can’t limit elections to the majority only can one! Having
made this formal point it is true that for reasons of stability as large
a part of the SB vote as possible should be wrested away from Gota.
A plus point for Gota is his ability to get things done. Whether it’s
sprucing up the city, demolishing low cost flats, evicting tenants,
making beggars vanish by magic or fighting a war Gota, is a doer and has
built himself a brand name in contrast to hobbling Ranil. SBs who see
human rights and democracy as mollycoddling Tamils, cast an approving
eye on Gota and see the Jolly Roger as a fitting escutcheon for his
candidacy. Many in the business community see in Gota a firm hand to
keep ‘rowdy’ workers in place and enforce discipline. Despite all this I
see a pattern ‘over-determined’ by ethnicity; but for this anti-Gota
ethnic polarisation yahapalana will fare much worse.
On balance, and if the UNP backs him (not necessarily a big if,
depending on how the next 12 months may pan out), how strong a
Gota-slayer will JVP leader AKD be? Before dismissing the option let’s
recount the strength of his case. Prior to the local government
elections many were saying "Cha, good buggers, they are not corrupt,
they are disciplined and given a chance can do something; but cha, can’t
vote for them no; can’t waste a vote". Yes there is goodwill towards
the JVP not only in subaltern but also in the middle classes. However,
there is apprehension about whether it will "run wild" if entrusted with
power; memories of 1971 and 1989-90 are still fresh. The possibility of
AKD, as an anti Gota-Rex candidate of a broad alliance, with the UNP as
the senior partner in control, is not ruled out though I suspect the
UNP base will not stand for it. "What! Again! After one rotten egg in
2015 do we want another outsider who won’t let ‘our government’ execute
policy?"
For these reasons I cannot, as of now, see any other strong anti Gota
(or anti Basil or Chamal) candidate in the wings. It seems we are stuck
with Ranil, warts and all, and it’s mostly warts. I would love to hear
serious, strategically thought out views about other options; concrete
proposals, names. The condition, the shared bottom-line, must be
defeating any Rajapaksa who shows his face. Sans this, I am not much
interested.

