A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Friday, September 7, 2018
Justice For Kamer! “Audi Alteram Partem” – It’s Unfair Too To Prejudge Him!
Justice must not only be done, it must be seen to be done, if the legal
system is to retain the trust of society. One of the key principles of
natural justice in law is “Audi alteram partem”- i.e.
nobody should be condemned unheard. The logical extension of this
principle is that everybody should be provided with legal aid to defend
himself or herself in the court of law so as to prove his/her
innocence. The presumption of innocence on
the other hand, is a right that is intended to apply across all
countries and cultures in the world, as a basic human right. Derived
from the nature of things and natural state of affairs, the presumption
of innocence, in connection with human behaviour, permeates and directs
the principle of legality of all criminal legislation, substantive or
procedural. Closely linked with and based upon the “presumption of
innocence” is the “burden of proof“.
The burden of proof is on the State to prove its case, not on the
accused to prove his innocence and certainly not for the accused to
prove his guilt. The notion that a person accused of a crime must be
found guilty ‘beyond reasonable doubt’ is what is known as the ‘burden
of proof’.
It is rather unfortunate to note to
what extent these sacrosanct legal maxims were being widely violated
and ignored in public space, very often even in the so-called advanced
West. Clear example was seen few days ago, when Kamer Nizamdeen,
a young lad hailing from Sri Lanka, who till then, had a bright future
ahead of him, saw all his future hopes dissipating without any trace,
when he was taken in by the NSW Australia Police allegedly on terror
charges for having in his possession, a so-called notebook with details
of terror targets involving both prominent political personalities and
locations down under. (Earlier I thought it was a Computer Notebook
given his IT background; but it was said to be a paper notebook). Both
his family and his friends, began reeling in rude shock, when the news about this arrest reached them, with misleading headlines being splashed across most dailies both local and international, feeling
a sense of powerlessness against Media sensationalism at its’ worst.
The unfair Press, with no concern to all these sensitivities, called
Kamer various names and invented non-existent links, introducing
incorrect and distorting headlines to add spice to the new-item, as they
were hell-bent on selling their papers.
Social media warriors too, joined the bandwagon and started carelessly
making innuendos in the public domain about Kamer’s ‘terror’ connections
and began copying and pasting biased Western Media news items, unfairly
prejudging Kamer Nizamdeen in the process, even before a fair and reasonable investigation is completed. It was also not surprising that few Sinhala online websites in Sri Lanka too, well known for its’ anti-Muslim hate started
its’ usual hate mongering process and harped on ‘unsubstantiated ISIS
connections’ to sling mud not only on Kamer but also on his uncle
Minister Faizer Mustapha too.
The hate posts in the social media began making both unfairly and
incorrectly, sweeping statements suggesting that Minister has been using
his official clout to
bring pressure on the Aussie Govt. and sending lawyers from Sri Lanka,
despite his clear interview to the Press recently that he will not be
prejudging and will leave it to the Australian judicial system to take
its’ course, although his family clearly believed that Kamer is
innocent. Prejudice, they say, is a great time saver, where opinions are
formed without having to get the facts. Some even suggested that
Minister should be investigated too. Kamer has thus become guilty until
proven innocent, a reversal of the above said classic American legal
maxim, in the wider background of Islamophobia hate campaign working in
full throttle both in the West and beyond where Islam is always the
adjudged culprit.



