Advisers to President Trump are counseling him against firing Deputy
Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein over memos written by the former
acting director of the FBI that say Rosenstein proposed secretly
recording the president and pushed for his removal from office.
The details of the memos written by former deputy FBI director Andrew
McCabe were revealed Friday, prompting immediate speculation that the
information would give Trump the justification to do what he has long
desired: dismiss Rosenstein, the Justice Department official overseeing
special counsel Robert S. Mueller III’s probe of Russian interference in
the 2016 election.
But those close to Trump and some of his allies on Capitol Hill believe
that a politically charged firing in advance of the midterm elections
will feed a Democratic narrative of chaos in the administration, and
that the president should wait until November to make any changes at the
Justice Department.
Rosenstein issued a public statement disputing the accuracy of the New
York Times story that described the memos written by McCabe and his
then-in-house counsel, FBI lawyer Lisa Page.
On Friday evening, Rosenstein was summoned to the White House, where
Chief of Staff John F. Kelly demanded to know whether the accounts were
accurate and, if not, urged Rosenstein to issue a more forceful denial.
After the Kelly meeting, Rosenstein issued a second statement, saying he
had never sought to secretly record Trump and never advocated removal
of the president. Mention of the constitutional option to remove the
president also echoed a recent op-ed in the New York Times
by an anonymous senior official in the administration who wrote that
“there were early whispers within the cabinet of invoking the 25th
Amendment.”
Trump spent much of Friday evening on Air Force One, where he polled
advisers about whether he should fire Rosenstein, according to a White
House official. In those discussions, the president said the story
confirmed what he knew all along — that Justice Department officials
were out to get him, according to the adviser.
The president continued to discuss the issue with aides and associates
Saturday and said he was more suspicious than furious about the reports,
peppering his inner circle with a round of questions about whether he
was being “baited” into taking action that could imperil his presidency
because McCabe — a person he detests — took some notes about private
conversations, as one ally close to him put it. White House aides who
spoke to Trump said he was less angry than they expected.
“McCabe complicates it,” the ally said. “He doesn’t trust McCabe and
thinks McCabe is maybe playing a game with memos — maybe because of his
book deal, maybe trying to take down [Trump]. So, he’s staying cool, for
now.”
St. Martin’s Press announced Tuesday that it will publish a book by McCabe, “The Threat: How the FBI Protects America in the Age of Terror and Trump,” in December.
Inside the top ranks of the Republican Party, there are also discussions about what a Rosenstein firing could mean for this year’s midterm elections, which are just weeks away.
Inside the top ranks of the Republican Party, there are also discussions about what a Rosenstein firing could mean for this year’s midterm elections, which are just weeks away.
Several veteran Republicans communicated to friends at the White House
on Saturday that any major upheaval at the Justice Department could
trigger a political hurricane for the GOP to weather in an already
difficult year. The White House, through various back channels, made
clear that no such shake-up was coming, according to two Republicans in
touch with Trump administration officials.
Trump has paid close attention to the conservative media’s reaction to
the story but has not been persuaded by the outraged calls by his
sometime confidants, such as Fox News’s Jeanine Pirro, to fire
Rosenstein — and he has nodded along agreeably as another Fox News
anchor, Sean Hannity, waved him off the idea, according to three
advisers to the president who were not authorized to speak publicly.
White House aides encouraged conservative allies in the media to not
provoke the president.
“We are experiencing tonight a massive constitutional crisis. And
frankly, this is designed to set up the president,” Hannity said on air.
“I have a message for the president tonight. Under zero circumstances
should the president fire anybody.”
“If it was up to many of the Fox News hosts, the president would have
already fired Mueller, but he hasn’t. He takes it in and takes the best
course available, under the circumstances,” former Trump political aide
Sam Nunberg said. “He knows it’s very easy to say something on cable,
and the reality of being under investigation and the threat of being
removed from office.”
Trump has kept a closer eye on the reaction of his congressional
boosters and staunch Rosenstein critics, such as Rep. Mark Meadows
(R-N.C.), who has pushed for the deputy attorney general’s impeachment,
the adviser said — and he has noted that Meadows has so far resisted
calling for Rosenstein to be fired.
“I think Rod needs to come before Congress this week and explain under
oath what exactly he said and what exactly he didn’t say. I think it’s
time,” Meadows said Saturday at the Values Voter Summit in Washington.
In a flurry of phone calls and text messages, other Trump allies seized
on the reports as an opening for Rosenstein to be pressured to acquiesce
to the demands of the congressional GOP, which has been locked for
months in tense talks with the Justice Department over documents related
to the Russia probe.
“The president should order Rosenstein to release all documents
requested under subpoena by every committee on the Hill within 72 hours.
And he should fire him immediately after if he does not comply in
full,” former White House chief strategist Stephen K. Bannon said in an
interview.
Trump’s cautious approach to Rosenstein’s future has been informed by
his complicated but somewhat repaired relationship with the deputy
attorney general.
Even as Trump publicly rails against the Justice Department as a den of
corruption with a “lingering stench,” as the president told his
supporters at a rally in Missouri on Friday, he has come to privately
appreciate Rosenstein as a competent official who, in his view, is far
sharper than embattled Attorney General Jeff Sessions, the advisers
said.
Those advisers also told Trump that it could benefit him that the people
he sees as his enemies are portrayed as conspirators. Trump also agreed
with the notion that the controversy supports his criticisms of the
Justice Department and could help secure confirmation of a new attorney
general after the midterm elections, the advisers said.
According to aides, Trump is likely to fire Sessions after the election
anyway and removing Rosenstein now would only serve to hurt Republicans
facing voters in a few weeks. As a result of the discussions, advisers
to the president said he is unlikely to fire Rosenstein in the near term
but still would like to eventually remove him.
Trump’s advisers have argued that leaving Rosenstein in place preserves
more options for the president as the Mueller investigation unfolds.
For now, according to one Republican in close contact with the White
House, the president can accept Rosenstein’s version of events — that
the deputy attorney general never contemplated invoking the 25th
Amendment and that any reference he made to recording the president was
made only in jest.
But Trump could always revive these episodes later should it prove to be
advantageous, for instance, if the Mueller investigation produces
conclusions unfavorable to him.
“If it goes the wrong way, you’ve got an arrow in your quiver,”
according to one person familiar with the White House’s attitude. “You
can say this guy was biased from the beginning.”

