A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, January 28, 2019
An Obstreperous Monk & Ostensible Compassion
The letter signed by a set of powerful Buddhist leaders including two
Mahanaykes and the Diyawadana Nilame of Dalada Maligawa, and addressed
to Buddha Sasana Minister Gamini Jayawickrama Perera, appealing for the release of Galagoda Atte Gnanasara Thera
from prison, and in turn, the minister’s recommendation to President
Maithiripala Sirisena(MS) to comply with that appeal on compassionate
ground, seem to be a carefully calculated but sinister move to maximise
its political advantage to competing parties. President Sirisena,
opposition leader Mahinda Rajapaksa(MR), and Prime Minister Ranil
Wickremesinghe(RW): all three would like to claim credit for Gnanasara’s
release, but it is the politics behind this ostensible compassion that
should worry a discerning public.
Gnanasara is not an ordinary innocent monk sent to jail without justification. The judiciary found this monk, who is also the General Secretary of the far right Bodu Bala Sena (BBS),
guilty of contempt of court over the hearing of the case of missing
journalist, Prageeth Ekneligoda. However, he and his BBS, even before
his incarceration, have been alleged to have involved not only in
planning and executing but also participating directly in a number of
racial and religious disturbances targeting minorities. There
is ample video recorded evidence that had gone viral to prove this
monk’s un-Buddhist and uncivilized behaviour. Yet, it is disappointing
that Gnanasara’s obstreperousness and unruliness have not received at
least a public rebuke if not outright condemnation from the Sangha.
Instead of him being de-ordained and de-robed to protect the sanctity of
Buddhist Sasana and cleanse the Sangha of elements like him who tarnish
Sangha’s compassionate and purist image, Mahanayakas are appealing to
the President for his freedom, so that he could continue doing in the
future what he had done in the past. (See my piece in Colombo Telegraph, 12 April 2018 on “Sangha Needs Cleansing”.)
By this move the signatories of the letter have shown their utmost
disrespect to the judiciary of the country. One wonders whether these
petitioners acted on their own volition and in the interest of Buddhism
and the nation or have fallen prey to sinister motives and manoeuvres of
some politicians. In all probability it is the latter that seems to
have motivated their action. Who is/are actually behind this scheme and
why?
To start with, MS’s unconstitutional parliamentary fiasco and its
aftermath has created greater volatility in domestic politics and severe
financial strain and productivity loss to the economy. Politically,
even though UNF has won a reprieve to govern until the end of its term,
the government is actually on life support and can only mark time before
facing another election, which MS and MR want to be held soon and they
have determined to exploit every opportunity that arises to make it
happen. While
UNF wants to protect the support it receives from TNA and Muslims, the
opposition wants to maximise its vote bank from the Buddhist majority.
The President in the meantime, who is more interested in ensuring his
chances of occupying the Presidency (with its powers undiminished) for
another term than in the welfare of the country and its people, is
desperately seeking political alliances (even with the devil) to achieve
his objective. The country’s economy in the meantime has fallen prey to
these political manoeuvres. Any long term measure and hard choices to
be made to reverse the economic descent will be sacrificed in the
interest of populism and political expediency.
In the absence of any sound economic program or blueprint to present
before the voters, political contestants will be looking for other vote
catching issues to win the race. In the political history of this
country almost every election since 1950s was fought on ethnic and
religious grounds. It is to exploit these explosive issues that the
utility of a person like Gnanasara will become handy to whoever who
could buy his and BBS support. The question is who stands to gain most
by the release of this confrontationist and rabble rousing monk?
Because of Gnanasasra’s open hatred of ethnic and religious minorities
and direct involvement in a number of anti-Tamil and anti-Muslim
violence, RW and UNP that are depending on TNA and Muslim support for
survival stand to lose the most by his release. However, the appeal for
his release originating from the Buddhist hierarchy cannot be opposed or
rejected easily by RW, because the cost of that rejection in terms of
Buddhist votes will be greater than the damage arising from his release. Hence,
the least costly action for the government would be to recommend the
release rather than just forwarding the letter and leave the final
decision to the President. This explains the recommendation of the
minister concerned. He and his government can claim some credit for
Ganasara’s release.


