A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, April 3, 2016
A new Commonwealth
Apr 1, 2016
Today Patricia Scotland, Baroness Scotland of Asthal QC, a Dominican and
British lawyer and former Attorney General for England, Wales and
Northern Ireland takes over as Secretary General of the Commonwealth.
Her job will be to rebuild an institution which her predecessor, Indian
diplomat Kamalesh Sharma, pushed towards irrelevance through his
hostility to civil society and calamitous handling of Sri Lanka’s
Commonwealth Summit.
Supporters may remember that
Sri Lanka hosted the Commonwealth Summit in 2013, and that the then
President of Sri Lanka Mahinda Rajapaksa chaired the Commonwealth from
2013 to 2015, despite the Government of the day’s total disregard for
“Commonwealth values” such as human rights and the rule of law. A strong
campaign by activists and the public saw protests in Colombo, London
and Chennai, a 4000 strong petition and
statements of condemnation from, among others, Desmond Tutu, Mary
Robinson, the House of Commons Foreign Affairs Select Committee, the
Royal Commonwealth society President Peter Kellner, David Milliband,
Malcolm Rifkind, Ricken Patel (the founder of Avaaz), civil society
around the world, and editorials in Bloomberg, the Washington Post, and
the Guardian.
Chennai Students stage a sit in. The Sri Lanka Campaign created the logo you can see on the banner.
The result was the worst attended summit on record with 3 countries
staying away entirely and 23 downgrading their representation. Canada,
India and Mauritius made it clear that this was as a direct consequence
of Sri Lanka’s human rights record. This in turn meant that Mauritius
had to be replaced as hosts of the 2015 meeting.
Sharma was strongly criticized at the time for ignoring human rights concerns and dismissing civil society. However he now claims that his “softly-softly
approach to Sri Lanka [was] vindicated by last year’s decision by
Mahinda Rajapaksa to bow out as president after losing an election”.
That idea is, as that article suggests, preposterous. Sharma buried legal opinions implicating the Sri Lankan Government, turned a blind eye to human rights violations, and repeatedly championed the shelving of war crimes investigations.
However, in spite of Sharma’s cosiness with the government of the day,
it was potentially the Commonwealth Summit, or more specifically the
strong counter-reaction to the Commonwealth Summit, that really started
to cause cracks in the hereto seemingly invincible Rajapaksa regime.
Despite significant intimidation and subsequent reprisals, Sri Lankan civil society put up a spirited resistance to the summit. This
resistance, and the coalition that it helped cement between civil
society in the north and south of the island, laid the foundations for
the movement which would eventually sweep Rajapaksa from power.
Furthermore, when elections finally came, Commonwealth monitors with the
support of Sri Lankan election monitors, played a significant role in
making sure they were largely fair.
And there was one final, inadvertent, legacy of Shama’s Sri Lankan
mistake. Embarrassed at failing to heed the calls to stay away, and
shocked by what he witnessed in the north of Sri Lanka, the Commonwealth
Summit did finally cause the British Prime Minister David Cameron to
belatedly support calls for an international investigation into war
crimes in Sri Lanka. This in turn contributed to the first international
investigation on Sri Lanka – the United Nations “OISL” report – the recommendations of which, if implemented, might finally give Sri Lanka a chance at lasting peace.

