A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, June 7, 2016
Israel has destroyed $74 million worth of EU projects

A Palestinian man inspects the
ruins of a playground demolished by Israeli occupation forces in the
West Bank village of Zaatara, near Nablus, on 12 April. The playground,
paid for by Belgium, is among tens of millions of dollars worth of
European-funded infrastructure Israel has destroyed.Nedal EshtayahAPA images
Charlotte Silver-5 June 2016
These are just a few examples of the at least 150 European-funded
structures in the occupied West Bank that Israel demolished in the first
three months of 2016.
Israel has destroyed more homes, businesses and public infrastructure in
these months than in all of 2015, according to a new report by the
non-profit Euro-Mediterranean Human Rights Monitor, or Euro-Med.
Each month, an average of 165 privately and internationally funded
structures were demolished or partially destroyed, representing a more
than three-fold increase from the previous rate of 50 demolitions per
month between 2012 and 2015.
More than 900 Palestinians have
been made homeless this year, according to UN statistics, and thousands
more have had their livelihoods affected by the wave of destruction.
Euro-Med says that the UN deputy coordinator for the Middle East peace process, Robert Piper,
has suggested the increase in demolitions is a response to the
escalation of violent confrontations between Palestinians and Israeli
occupation forces that began in October 2015.
But Israeli politician Moti Yogev, who has applied pressure on Israeli occupation forces to ramp up demolitions,said,
“I have no doubt that the government’s firm stance is in part a result
of the unilateral measures taken by Europe,” referring to the EU’s
decision to label settlement products late last year.
If so, the demolitions can be likened to the “price tag” attacks on Palestinians and their property carried out by settlers as a form of revenge for policies they don’t like.
EU inaction
The discrepancy in explanations may be due in part to the fact that
European officials have tried to downplay the extent of Israel’s
destruction of EU-funded infrastructure in order to avoid embarrassment,
according to Euro-Med researcher Cécile Choquet.
In 2012, Chris Davies, a UK member of the European Parliament, and
Štefan Füle, the former European commissioner for Enlargement and
European Neighborhood Policy, submitted a list of EU-funded projects
Israel had destroyed in the first eleven years of the millennium.
The 82-item list amounted to $56 million worth of losses.
But since then European Union bureaucrats
have kept this kind of data classified, according to Euro-Med, which
estimates that the total amount of EU aid squandered since 2001 totals
$74 million. Some $26 million of this was destroyed during Israel’s
bombardment of Gaza in 2014.
While European diplomats have issued condemnatory statements, they have
yet to call into question the military and economic trade deals that
undergird EU-Israel relations.
Last month, for instance, the EU criticized the
“regrettable trend of confiscations and demolitions, since the
beginning of the year, including of EU-funded humanitarian assistance,”
after Israel destroyed the shelters of a Bedouin community near
Jerusalem.
But the statement contained no hint of any measures to actually hold Israel accountable.
According to Haaretz, increasing political pressure is being placed on EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini to confront Israel on the demolitions of EU-funded projects.
Mogherini reported that some EU members are demanding compensation from Israel.
The EU envoy to Israel, Ambassador Lars Faaborg-Andersen,
reportedly warned senior Israeli officers last week that if the
demolitions remained at this level, EU-Israel relations could be harmed.
The EU mission in Tel Aviv did not respond to a request for comment from
The Electronic Intifada on what the consequences, if any, would be if
Israel did not halt the demolitions.
Another meeting between EU officials and Israel’s foreign ministry is
scheduled for later this month to discuss a freeze on demolishing
EU-funded structures.
Impossible to build
Demolitions overwhelmingly occur in Area C, 60 percent of the occupied West Bank that is under total Israeli control under the terms of the 1993 Oslo accords.
More than 70 percent of the Palestinians in that area are not connected
to any water network. Between 2000 and 2014, Israeli authorities
approved only 1.5 percent of Palestinian applications for building
permits in Area C.
But COGAT, the Israeli occupation bureaucracy that administers military
rule of Palestinians in Area C, has insisted the demolitions are
measures “against illegal building.”
Far-right Israeli organization Regavim has
co-opted the language of international groups who criticize Israel’s
settlement building, describing EU projects in the West Bank as “illegal
constructions in Area C.”
The EU’s investment in Area C is in keeping with its political commitment to what it calls the two-state solution.
To that same end, the EU is the biggest donor to the Palestinian Authority.
Since 1994 it has provided $6.3 billion in aid to the entity that
nominally rules over Palestinians in the occupied West Bank and Gaza
Strip.
Most of the aid the EU funnels to the PA is to support daily operations: salaries of employees and security forces.
Between 2007 and 2015, the EU allocated $2.8 billion for PA governance.
Since 2000, the European Commission, the EU’s executive, has allocated
$792 million towards the basic humanitarian needs of the Palestinian
population in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The EU and its member states, meanwhile, have continued their arms trade with Israel.
French political scientist Caroline du Plessix told Euro-Med, “There is
no Palestinian state today. The question is: What are we funding? Are we
helping Israel to maintain the occupation, or are we truly helping the
Palestinians build their independence?”
