A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, August 24, 2016
Blood, blood and more blood!
susmend2610@gmail.com
I
have been intrigued by the reactions to the slogan "Sinha-Le" used by
some group or other. Gradually, it has become a point of intensive
debate and controversy. I write this piece today because I saw a clip on
TV News about a fracas that occurred between two groups. One group who
claimed no political affiliations had a peaceful demonstration on the
theme ‘Different yet Equal’ – "Ekama Le" recently. This group was led by
the controversial politician Azad Sally who thrives on controversy and
publicity. He is otherwise politically bankrupt. However controversial
or bankrupt the group-leader is, he and his group had every democratic
right to express their views to the public.
I believe that Azad Sally’s underlying motives were successfully
realized. I believe that they were two-pronged: (i) to gain as much
attention and publicity to himself as he is usually in search of; and
(ii) to rile the ‘Sinha-Le’ group or any other Sinhala nationalist group
who could be baited into a provoked reaction. Both were realized. There
were others in that group who, I am sure, had altruistic and bona fide
motives for a better Sri Lanka.They were demonstrating peacefully and
that is to be admired and appreciated.
A group purportedly called the ‘Sinha Le Jathika Balamuluwa’ led by some
monks, and also claiming no political affiliations, descended on the
peaceful demonstration and created an unruly disturbance. Any discerning
observer would have seen that Azad Sally’s group retained the moral
high-ground. They were disciplined and kept their emotions under better
control. And the message was further enhanced by a red shirted and
bearded young man who was repeating loudly and with great solemnity –
"Siyalusathwayo niduk wewa" to telling effect.In a previous avatar, he
would have been definitively identified as a JVPer. But he is probably
not, since today, true JVPers wear white long-sleeved tunics and most
have no beards! And they recite a Sanskrit/Vedic Sloka or two once in a
way in parliament and outside.The red shirted young man had his ‘few
minutes upon the stage’ before he was ‘heard no more’. The police were
rightly on the ‘right’-side. They tried to shut the disrupters and get
them to move away. Ultimately, the disrupters took the fallback option
that seemed to boil down to a copyright infringement. The disrupters
insisted that some of Sally’s group carried posters with "Sinha-Le" on
them which is their ‘trade mark’ (I am not sure whether they have
registered it or not) and therefore those posters should be removed. An
agreement was reached on that point and I presume that the whole thing
ended there and peace reigned thereafter.
The above, was just a preamble to set the tone for what I really want to
say. It is this whole thing about this relatively recent trend in the
connotation of ‘blood’ in our political lexicon. Prior to this recent
trend, ‘blood’ meant "30-years of a bloody war". And we saw so much
blood daily in our news programmes for so long, that it no longer
elicited the expected reactions in us to see blood and body parts strewn
on the roads.Blood in the battlefield, blood on streets and city
centres and busy intersections, blood in buses and trains. It was blood,
blood and more blood. This gradually developed in us an insensitivity
to blood.
Then there was ‘blood’ that was shed in a more organized manner. And
depending whether you were a proxy group for the LTTE like the TNA et
al, or of the Sri Lanka Armed forces in their fight against fascistic
terrorism, you would be deeply concerned by the ‘blood’ shed by "our"
young men (and even children) in the battlefields of the North and East.
This brings me to the concept of blood that was shed in battlefields the
world over. Whether it was blood that was shed in tribal wars to save
one’s tribe from annihilation and slavery by other tribes from the
earliest days of human civilization; or blood shed by people to save
their societies and their culture and their life styles in the face of
foreign colonial invasions; or internecine conflicts within nations,
more often than not, manipulatively created by a global policy of
‘divide and rule’, it was still blood that was shed.
Blood legends are created to make them not just ordinary blood. The
blood that was shed in those circumstances becomes ‘heroic blood’. They
are great stories. Myths are built around them and legends told and
retold. From the mythologies of the Iliad to the Ramayana, throughout
the ages to the two World Wars (38 million casualties in WW I and 60
million dead in WW II – that is a lot of blood!), to our present times,
we have had ‘heroic blood’ shed. All the battles in Europe and the Far
East during WW II shed ‘heroic blood’. So was the blood that was shed in
the ‘Great Patriotic War’ of the Soviet Union and the Battle of
Stalingrad. Today, in Sri Lanka, we have ‘Rana Viruwo’ who fought a Long
War and shed their ‘heroic’ blood for their country and we have also a
‘Suriya Thevan’ and his men who shed their ‘heroic’ blood for an ever
receding mirage of Tamil nationhood.
Hollywood has made a ‘killing’ (pun intended). See this small sample of
the movie titles: "Blood", "Captain Blood", "Flesh and Blood", "First
Blood", "The Blood of Heroes" and all those "heroic" war movies that
Hollywood churned out, ad nauseum. All had one thing in common –
shedding of blood and more blood. Blood is a compulsion-driven common
human fetish. Dracula and other vampire tales tell us that. Blood is
money too! As I said Hollywood makes billions out of spilling celluloid
blood. The more blood spilt, the more billions you can make. If you are a
small-timer, you can sell a pint for cash – and that, not only in Blood
Banks. You can buy it too for the right price.
The Old Testament of the Bible has this, among so many others, to say
about blood: "And almost all things are by the law purged with blood;
and without shedding of blood is no remission - Hebrews 9:22). So blood,
we must shed. That seems to be part of our common human destiny. I came
across this in the internet: "Blood is life, and music is life, so
songs about blood just make sense." Bloody songs are endless. Here is a
sample: "Let it Bleed" and "Too Much Blood" (Rolling Stones); "Sunday
Bloody Sunday" (U2); "Blood on Blood" (Bon Jovi); "If You Want Blood"
(AC/DC); "Raining Blood" (Slayer); "Power in Blood" (Dolly Parton) and
"Pay in Blood" (Bob Dylan). So as you can see, there is blood everywhere
there is human endeavour. Obvious, you might say. If so, is it that
unexpected that we have a political organisation that calls themselves
the ‘Sinha Le Jathika Balamuluwa’?
It is in the context of ‘heroic’ blood that ‘Sinha-Le’ as a slogan and
political movement was born. In the context of ‘heroic’ blood shed for
country. It has its obvious implications of ethnicity, language and
religion. It was said to be an ‘ethnic war’, after all. And therefore,
it is not surprising that derogatory epithets of chauvinism and
majoritarian hegemony have been cast upon it.
It was even said that "Sinha-Le" movement was the "newest threat to the
island’s integrity". Contrary to this opinion, others argue that the
"Sinha-Le" movement is an understandable response to a tangible threat
to the national identity and thereby, national integration.
While the erudite will debate the connotation of the word "Sinhale" as
against "Sinha-le" with its regional implications, and whether the
reference is to ‘Sinhala blood’ or whether it emanates from a legendary
sense of pride of being of ‘Lion blood’, some aspects of it is taking a
turn for the ludicrous. I found this in the peaceful demonstration that I
mentioned at the outset. There was a poster stating "B+ Le". The
political is turning into the biological. This "B+ Le" slogan was in
direct contradiction to their theme – "Ekama Le". If one claims, "B+ Le"
then there is no "Ekama Le". Others may be of a different ‘Le’ – A, AB
or O and Rhesus positive or negative - giving rise to a minimum of 8
different types. Thereby, the "Ekama Le" slogan falls flat on its face
by its own internal contradiction. We are so different in our "Le"s that
if by accident we get somebody else’s incompatible "Le", we could die
of it! So by that count, we are certainly not "Ekama Le" at all.
Therefore, its best that we all take this ‘blood’ business for what it
really is - a metaphor for a developing political divergence than going
into hysterics of being ‘Sinhla-Le’ or ‘Ekama le’ or "B+ le’.Or being
misled by our general dread or love of blood. Underlying this
superficial, sloganized ‘blood battle’, a real crisis is in the making.
Pasting labels on people or groups as being "jathiwadi" is not going to
resolve issues. Having ‘anti-blood’ demonstrations is a waste of time,
however good might be the intention. Actually, if the demonstrators
wanted to be more biologically correct, they could have carried a poster
saying "We are ‘anti-Sinha Le’ antibodies"! That would have been
appropriate both politically and biologically.
We need to take, not what they are sloganizing, but what they are really
trying to say. Take them on issue by issue and see whether a reasonable
approach to resolve atavistic fears of a minority of 16 million people
living in a small island with a language and a culture and a written
history that makes them an infinitesimal % of the world’s people, is
available. It has to be available. Theirs is a cry for survival in the
massive wilderness of macro-scale global cultures. Their atavistic fears
have been there for over 2000 years where the legend has it that Gamani
of Magama lay in foetal position on the crumpled sheets of his Royal
bed and exclaiming that he has no space to extend his legs in comfort.
But all that time ago, he said he was being restrained only from the
North by the Indian invaders and in the South by the great ocean. But
today, it seems worse. Sri Lanka is hemmed in geographically and
politically due to its strategic location from all sides: The Indian
behemoth on the one hand, and Chinese global interests and the urgency
of US desires for the strategic extension of its 7th fleet in the face
of Chinese expansionism on the other. Then, from another flank, there is
the Islamic revival and resurgence and its rapid spread (which
includes, unfortunately, its wing of horrific murderous extremism)with a
global reach through the massive funds generated from Middle East oil
resources at their disposal for expansion and influence. These are
reflected in the increasing belligerence on the global stage and also of
their fringe politicians in Sri Lanka. These are the local and global
realities. Therefore, it should not be surprising that this miniscule
global % of 16 million people who claim to be of "Sinha-Le" are
seriously concerned and disturbed.
Our current government,for political expediency or other less known
reasons, is playing in a big game of high stakes in which they are mere
pawns and one that they don’t seem to fully understand. They are playing
Russian roulette with our nation’s future with such utter disregard for
informed, rational and consensual decision-making,that they indeed
leave us with good enough reasons for doubt, uncertainty, misgivings,
distrust and suspicion about their ulterior motives.
So let us leave different kinds of blood aside. It is time to stop
quibbling with bloody slogans that, as Fanon said, are just "glutinous
words that stick in our teeth". Let us shed no more blood.
Let us leave BLOOD alone. Let us get real and get to the GUTS of it!