A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Friday, January 5, 2018
Saying One Party Is No Good Does Not Imply An Assertion That An Alternative Is Good – Reply To Rajiva Wijesinha

By Shyamon Jayasinghe –January 4, 2018
“I agree, however, with Rajiva Wijesinha on one point here, namely when he charges Ranil Wickremasinghe of showing backingto
Arjuna Mahendran as Governor of the Central Bank, ….despite obvious
misdemeanours. Ranil does have a weakness of supporting old Royalist
classmates etc and turning a blind eye at their misdemeanours.” That is
his bad kamma and he will pay for that.
Flawed Logic
Rajiva Wijesinhasays I
bear an “intellectual pretence.” Being curious to know what an
‘intellectual’ is like, I looked at the Cambridge English Dictionary in
my possession. It says, “relating to your abilityto think and understand things, especially complicated ideas.”
I don’t think this is a special gift that persons like Rajiva possess.
Most of us readers have that. It is just that some cloud their intellect
with emotions and prejudices that distort their perspective in making
judgments about men and matters. Pardon me, Rajiva has a serious problem
here as is evident in his response piece to my article that appears in the Colombo Telegraph.
For one, he is illogical in his reasoning. The
very central theme of his criticism of my referenced article represents
flawed logic. This is because he believes that my repudiationof the SLFP’s record implies I am an “apologist for the UNP,” one of thatparty’s competitors.
Hang Up
I haven’t said any of that
sort. Rajiva has a hang-up in this whole political business, namely that
he possesses an old family grouse with Ranil Wickremasinghe. This
prejudice has clouded his reasoning faculty. Unless he is mindful of
this limitation he is unlikely to be productive in his political
thinking.
Rajiv’s most recent row with the Prime Minister is over
his role as State Minister in the newly-formed Unity Government.
Everyone in Sri Lanka knows that the portfolio of ‘State Minister,’ is
humbug. It has been a strategic device to
keep MPs happy by giving the latter the title to impress their networks
and the accompanying perks like STF security, official luxury cars and
so forth. For decades, our politicians have been kept content
by this trick. Our political leaders don’t bother hat this is being
done at the expense of taxpayers. The typical Sri Lankan craves for
‘thaththvaya,” and that greed must be satiated.
However,Rajiv aWijesinghe apparently couldn’t grasp
that subtle situation and he went on to pretend to be a fully-fledged
minister and kept overriding his Cabinet Minister by giving officials
various policy lines to work on, monitoring their work and so on. What Rajiva should have done was to sit pretty with the title and go about like a peacock displaying its colours.
Rajiva’s action annoyed his Minister and a bit of a
dispute occurs. He went up to the Prime Minister and complained.Ranil
Wickremasinghe, in his usual low PR-style, asked his cousin to go and
read a book titled,”The power of the Impossible.” This vexed Rajiva and
he threw away his portfolio unnecessarily. In his article Rajiva claims
to have done a “good job.” That is an assessment, again, that should
have been left for others to make. However, Rajiva, even being a genuine
‘intellectual,’ unlike me, cannot realise that.
I Am No Party Man
So off he goes to keep criticising the UNP component of this government headed by Mainripala Sirisena. He
is so sensitive about it that he has jumped to the conclusion in my
case, namely that by my criticising the SLFP I am showing up as a UNP
man.
I am no Party’s man. I can
assure readers that.Any support I give to any Party or political leader
is only conditional upon that entity doing what is expected of it to do. The
simple reason is that one has to make such conditional decisions at
some time or another in political life. On the other hand, if one gives
unconditional backing, then one is a confirmed party man and an
‘apologist,’ for that party.
