A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, June 5, 2018
Siva Senai’s Anti-Muslim Tirade – Buddhists & Hindus Should Be Careful

“Hate is too great a burden to bear. It injures the hater more than it injures the hated” ~ Coretta Scott King
It is not rocket science to realize that the underlying plans of this
Hindu fundamentalist outfit is to create further dissensions among the
Muslim and Tamil Hindu communities at a challenging time in history
where religious fundamentalism and anti-Muslim hate has
almost mainstream in our society. Sometime back, there was a big
commotion in a Trinco school where a Muslims teacher was not allowed to
wear her Abhaya which created lot of bad blood and bitter taste in
already strained inter communal relationships. It was widely suspected
that Siva Senai and some disgruntled Tamil politicians were involved in
this case. Then we had the case of the leader of Siva Senai making
another commotion about cattle slaughter in Chavakachcheri. In speaking
to an little known TV station, he made a vicious statement – He said
that if Muslims cannot fall in line with the lifestyles of the majority –
the Buddhists and Hindus, then they must leave, little realizing that
the Muslims are part of our heritage for over 10 centuries- a typical Islamophobiastatement
which we hear being regularly uttered by other Sinhala Buddhist
extremist anti Muslim groups. Both these incidents arising only with the
last few months after the infamous Digana anti-Muslim violence cannot
be dismissed as a parallel one-off event totally unconnected; rather
signs are clear that there appears to be coordination and resonance in
their anti-Muslim messages between both Sinhala Buddhist hate groups
like BBS, and Sinha Ley and Hindu hate outfit like Siva Senai.
It was in 2016 that the dreaded militant Shiv Sena in Mumbai extended
its support to its Sri Lankan Tamil outfit called Siva Senai, (which
takes its name from Lord Shiva ) which then triggered concerns among the
mainstream politicians that sectarian outfits will reopen wounds of a
30-year-old civil war that ended only in 2009. Concerns were then raised
that the militant nature of the new Siva Senai could break the
status-quo prevailing in Northern Lanka while Tamils were wary that
outfits like Senai would split Tamil unity. The Siva Senai, operating in the North, is led by a Sachithananthan then
said in a press interview that his party extends support to the new
Lankan outfit. However the Siva Sena says that that they also had the support of BJP, VHP, and RSS. Despite Siva Senai’s recent assertion to
join hands with the extreme Buddhist groups against the Muslims, it’s
original plan was to fight “coercive conversion” from Hinduism to
Buddhism,which is the dominant religion among the Sinhalese.
Our nation has just come out of a bloody war. It was clear that outfits
like BBS tried to start off religious based wars by launching a hate
campaign against the Muslims , with some support from the higher ups
from the Rajapakse government. The result was further chaos in the
country and dissension between Sinhalese and Muslims. Therefore, we
don’t need another religion based political outfit like Siva Senai, just
as we don’t need Sinhala Buddhist extremist outfits like BBS. Later
during this government too which was voted in on a national
reconciliation platform, other
outfits like Sinhaley and Amitha/Saliya’Prasad combine continued those
anti –Muslim hate campaign and violence culminating in Digana. We are
aware of what Shiva Sena has been doing in India and obviously we
therefore don’t need more Sri Lankan Senaas to add to our agony.
In fact, Tamil leaders were more worried about the Siva Senai even at
that time than the Southern political parties. They feared that although
Senai was a new organization with little mass support, the prospect of a
religion-based divide loomed large. Thus, observers saw the formation
of Siva Sena as a regressive development in Sri Lankan Tamil politics.
In fact MP Sumanthiran had this to say that that time in a press
interview . “Assertion of a religious identity is not a bad thing. But
at this stage, we don’t need it. Our identity is Tamil identity. We are
totally secular. There are Hindus, Christians, and Muslims among the
Tamils. All are equal. We can’t divide them on the basis of religion.
Such organisations can take extreme positions. We already have a
Buddhist extremist organisation Bodu Bala Sena (BBS). Birth of another
extremist organisation opposed to BBS ideology is a very dangerous
thing. It can create enmity between different religions. Both are called
Sena, meaning army. Whatever may be their good intention, but the
perception is negative. We can’t have outfits with the names like
Sena.”. With outfits like Siva Sena and politicians like Wigneswaran,
parading a Hindu identity, which is no longer taboo, was not a part of Sri Lankan Tamil politics earlier,. Besides, Seva Senai modelled after the militant Shiv Sena of India “can become uncontrollable.”
Many observers also see the hand of India in the formation of Siva Senai. The Siva Senai have shown signs of expanding
its’ network, with plans to have organisers for all the 25 districts of
Sri Lanka which will therefore require external support. As Sachchithanantham
himself accepted, he expects to get funding from India and the Tamil
diaspora. Therefore, there is more than it meet the eye.
However interestingly , this time Siva Sena appears to toe a unified
line with Sinhala Buddhist extremists in attempting to alienate the
Muslims of Sri Lankan through the language of cattle slaughter. Both
Hindu as well as the Sinhala Buddhist community should be careful in not
getting trapped into this Siva Sena narrative in attempting to alienate
another community –The Muslims.

