A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, September 25, 2012
Freedom House,
US based an independent watchdog dedicated to the expansion of freedom
around the world, today released its report on Freedom on the Net
2012. The report categorised Sri Lanka as particularly vulnerable to
deterioration in the coming 12 months, among Azerbaijan, Libya,
Malaysia, Pakistan, Russia and Rwanda.
According to Freedom House this report is the third in a series of
comprehensive studies of internet freedom around the globe and covers
developments in 47 countries that occurred between January 2011 and May
2012. In its report under the subheading Countries at Risk it says; as
part of its analysis, Freedom House identified a number of important
countries that are seen as particularly vulnerable to deterioration in
the coming 12 months: Azerbaijan, Libya, Malaysia, Pakistan, Russia,
Rwanda, and Sri Lanka.
The report says; “In November 2011, five popular news websites known for
their reporting on human rights, governance issues, and corruption were
arbitrarily blocked. Prior to this incident, the government and the
TRCSL had never admitted to blocking websites but did so in this case on
the premise of concerns about defamation and the violation of privacy.
In December 2011 and intermittently in November 2011,
Colombotelegraph.com, a news and commentary website run by exiled Sri
Lankan journalists, was also blocked with absolutely no justification
provided by authorities,but is accessible as of early 2012. The
authorities have occasionally blocked website domains hosted on the
servers of blogging platforms rather than specific blogs
themselves,although only a few of the most popular blogs publish
political content and dissenting narratives.”
Below we give the Sri Lanka section of the report, alternatively you can read it here
INTRODUCTION:
Since coming into power in 2005, the ruling United People’s Freedom
Alliance (UPFA) has pursued an ambitious information, communications,
and technology (ICT) policy characterized by the widespread provision of
internet access and improvement in digital literacy. The new
government’s initiatives have also led to the adoption and further
development of the decade-old e-Sri Lanka project, which is geared
towards building “information infrastructure and an enabling
environment, developing ICT human resources… leveraging ICT for economic
and social development,”[1] and providing access to “diverse and unrestricted sources of information and means of communication.”[2]
Despite recognition of the internet’s value and impact on economic
growth, the military campaign against the Liberation Tigers of Tamil
Eelam (LTTE, or Tamil Tigers)—which ended in May 2009—hindered adequate
investment in the ICT sector and expansion of the internet across the
country. Furthermore, the empowering impact of the internet in Sri Lanka
has been undermined by the government’s efforts to arbitrarily block,
filter, and regulate online content that provides dissenting views and
reportage on sensitive political issues.
In January 2007, internet access and mobile phone connections in the
northern and eastern regions of the country were disconnected on account
of national security concerns.[3] In
the same year, the government made its first attempt to clamp down on
online content in response to reportage on the military campaign against
the LTTE and civilian casualties.[4] While
there is a clear trend with respect to the restriction of online
content under the current government, since 2007 there has also been an
incremental growth in the number of online news sites, new media
initiatives, and the leveraging of social media for socioeconomic and
political activism. However, in a post-war context, the arbitrary
blocking of websites has continued in 2011—a trend that contradicts the
government’s own recognition of the role of ICTs in promoting access to
information and free of expression—and the government has expressed a
need for greater regulation of online content.[5]