A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, September 25, 2012
India-Sri Lanka relations hostage to Tamil parties
Shastri Ramachandaran | Agency: DNA | Tuesday, September 25, 2012
India’s neighbours are not necessarily its friends. They can hardly be
called India’s allies. In regional and international forums, more often
than not, they are ranged against one another. History, geography,
religion, geopolitics, uneven development, competing ambitions and much
else account for this state of affairs.
As a result, bilateral relations have their ups and downs and can be
warm or chilly, euphoric or troubling. Even so, over the decades, the
South Asian countries have learned to live and let live, regardless of
the problems at home and across their respective borders.
The striving is to maintain friendly relations, a climate conducive for
talks on matters of mutual interest and to prevent any situation from
reaching breaking point. However, Tamil Nadu’s political parties,
despite being an integral part of coalition governments at the Centre
for long years now, do not seem to have grasped this elementary aspect
of diplomacy.
The Kazhagams – Jayalalithaa’s AIADMK, Karunanidhi’s DMK and Vaiko’s
MDMK – do their best to vitiate India’s relations with Sri Lanka. The
sideshows staged by these parties against India-Sri Lanka cooperation
and against dignitaries (and ordinary citizens) from the island republic
would be handy to illustrate a tract on “How to lose friends and
alienate people”.
It is bad enough that New Delhi is not good at making friends of India’s
neighbours. It is worse when the DMK and AIADMK push their sectarian
agenda in external affairs and foment hostility to cultivate ill will.
Sri Lanka President Mahinda Rajapaksa’s visit last week was yet another
occasion for the Kazhagams to put up their predictable tamasha of
protests – in the name of championing the rights of Tamils in Sri Lanka.
The frontline performer this time was MDMK general secretary Vaiko.
President Rajapaksa, who laid the stone for a University of Buddhist and
Indic Studies in Sanchi, held wide-ranging talks with Prime Minister
Manmohan Singh in Delhi. Doubtless, devolution of powers to create
conditions for Sri Lanka’s Tamils “to live with dignity and respect”,
elections in the Tamil-dominated Northern Province and the political
plight of Tamils after the LTTE’s defeat in May 2009 were discussed
between Singh and Rajapaksa.
A Comprehensive Economic Partnership Agreement (CEPA) and Indian
fishermen being attacked by Sri Lankan navy were among the items on the
agenda of the two leaders, who also met without their aides.
The significance of the meeting goes beyond the issues discussed
because, one, it was the first meeting between the two heads of
government after India voted against Sri Lanka at the UN Human Rights
Council in March this year. Two, this was the first meeting to deal with
a range of substantive issues after June 2010. Three, Sri Lanka’s human
rights record comes up for review at the end of this year. Four, New
Delhi is keen to address the unrest among Tamils by pressing for their
political rights. (In contrast, the Kazhagams appear to be interested in
whipping up sentiment solely for political mileage in Tamil Nadu).
New Delhi has to make amends for the blunder of voting with the US
against Sri Lanka in the UNHRC. Whereas the DMK and AIADMK keep
targeting Sri Lanka as part of their petty one-upmanship games against
each other. Their posturing has provoked attacks on innocent Sri Lankan
pilgrims visiting Tamil Nadu. AIADMK chief minister Jayalalithaa
objected to Sri Lankan defence personnel being trained in military
institutions in India. Karunanidhi sought to outdo Jayalalithaa by
saying that Sri Lanka cannot be considered “friendly” – because it
allows China to execute defence projects in Jaffna.
It may not occur to the DMK and AIADMK that their posturing may be
driving Sri Lanka (away from India) into the arms of China. If these
parties persist in their unfriendly campaign, Sri Lanka may be forced to
not only hand over more projects to China, or even Pakistan, but even
start sending their defence personnel to these countries for training.
Then the fat would be truly in the fire.
Sri Lanka is in a zone of Indian influence and is of enormous strategic value. India is Sri Lanka’s preferred partner and the one country from which it would like all help. Instead of creating conditions that make Colombo approach Beijing or Islamabad, it is high time the national parties make the DMK and AIADMK see strategic sense
Sri Lanka is in a zone of Indian influence and is of enormous strategic value. India is Sri Lanka’s preferred partner and the one country from which it would like all help. Instead of creating conditions that make Colombo approach Beijing or Islamabad, it is high time the national parties make the DMK and AIADMK see strategic sense
These two regional parties are not being just perverse. They are being
irresponsible and hurting India’s strategic interests. One would have
expected that with stints at the Centre, they would acquire an
understanding of India’s larger national interest, strategic stakes and
global role. Far from that, as their role and power expands at the
Centre, the Kazhagams’ worldview seems to be shrinking into even
narrower confines.
The author is an independent political and foreign affairs commentator