It
is learnt that the committee appointed to look into the charges against ousted
Chief Justice Dr. Shirani Bandaranayake comprised Professor Mark Cooray, former
Central Bank Deputy Governor Ranee Jayamaha, former Parliament Secretary General
Dhammika Kithulegoda and Consortium of Humanitarian Agencies Chairman Jeevan
Thiagarajah.It
is reliably learnt that certain panelists in their individual recommendations
submitted to presidential secretary Lalith Weeratunge had expressed reservations
of varying degrees on the charges.Opposition
political parties and senior lawyers yesterday urged the government to reveal
the observations made by the independent experts whose opinion was sought by the
President on the PSC report and the charges against ousted Chief Justice Dr.
Shirani Bandaranayake.The
observations submitted to Mr. Weeratunge included a comprehensive inquiry into
both the constitutional provisions of the impeachment and the charges against
the Chief Justice.Daily
Mirror also learns that in their observations on the constitutional procedure,
certain members had concurred with the determination by the Supreme Court on
January 3, stating that “parliament can even now pass a law and recommence the
impeachment and use the PSC report as a preliminary fact finding
report”.The
President however signed the order to remove the Chief Justice on January
13.On
an earlier occasion, at the opening of a building complex for the Institute of
Chartered Accountants at Longden Place, President Rajapaksa said that subsequent
to the findings of the PSC, he would appoint an independent panel to advise him
because, “I want it to be true to my conscience”.Daily
Mirror also learns that three of the members except for Professor Mark Cooray,
met the President, Minister G.L. Peiris and the presidential secretary, during
the latter stages of the impeachment saga, for initial discussions on the
findings of the PSC.The
members had no wanted to be identified to the media, which resulted in the
Government’s cover up of the names of the panelists.Despite
confirmation of three names to Daily Mirror previously, when contacted on
Tuesday, presidential spokesman Mohan Samaranayake said the President had
decided not to divulge any of the names except that of Professor
Cooray.“There
was a senior banker and a former high ranking official of parliament, but I
can’t confirm any names because the President at a meeting held with the editors
said those in the committee did not wish to be identified” Mr. Samaranayake said
on Tuesday.During
Monday evening’s meeting with editors, the President had told those present that
four members were appointed to the committee and there were no dissenting views
among them.“This
was not a formally appointed committee, it was only a panel appointed to look
into the charges and to make recommendations,” Mr. Samaranayake said.When
asked about the recommendations by the Panel, he said the President was advised
to follow the due process.“He
was advised to follow the due process according to the Constitution. He was
advised that according to the Constitution once parliament submits a motion
there is no turning back,” Mr. Samaranayake said.Commenting
on the matter UNP Select Committee Member Lakshman Kiriella said the government
has not been honest about anything with regard to the impeachment with the
people.“What
happened to this committee that was to be appointed for the President to agree
with his conscience? If they were appointed what were their recommendations and
why is the government trying to cover up this entire process up, and what is
there to hide to the people if this was such a transparent process,” he
askedMeanwhile,
Parliament Select Committee Member Vijitha Herath asked what the government was
hiding from the people.“They
made a big hue and cry over appointing an independent committee and it looked
like eyewash to the people. We as citizens of the country want to know if the
Committee was appointed, who were in that committee and what were their
recommendations?” he said.Senior
Lawyer S.L. Gunasekara told Daily Mirror that despite the observations by the
panel not being legally binding it was of “definite public interest to reveal
their observations”.“Even
though the observations of this so called panel has no legal or binding effect,
the fact remains that those selected by the President himself to advise him on
the so called PSC and the charges against the Dr. Bandaranayake has submitted a
report which is of public interest. Why aren’t the people told about this
report,” he asked. (Hafeel
Farisz)
|