A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, January 29, 2013
The Bigger Thing Is To Keep Matchstick In Box
It
is easy to see ominous signs where there are none. Molehills, after all, are
frequently made into mountains. On the other hand, if atom can be made into
bomb, we must acknowledge that society is a tinder box and people matchsticks.
Few things inspire collective umbrage as assaults on collective identity,
perceived or real.
Sri
Lanka has enough collectives to make anyone given to rabble rousing on
identity-account salivate. It does not take the entire collective to feel
wronged. It does not take even a single individual to feel affronted on account
of identity. It can take either, but it would also suffice for a few shrew
(misguided or otherwise) individuals who know that spark can make a bonfire to
gather enough tinder or create it if necessary and put match to it.
It
is glib to say ‘communities have always lived in harmony’. There have been long
periods of peaceful co-existence, but no two communities can claim to have been
‘always at peace’ except in situations of subjugation, where the ‘peace’ is
obtained at a price and resentment and humiliation go from raging fire to
subdued flame to smoldering ember. The truth is that identity matters. It is
primary source of meaning, for human beings are cultural creatures; they have
language, customs and subscribes to cosmologies. They are frail and therefore
vulnerable. Those vulnerabilities are preyed on by identity ‘others’ as well as
identity exploiters.
In
short we are a nation where there are enough red flags around to upset anyone
whose identity fixation is capable of transforming him/her into the proverbial
bull. Indeed even a pink flag waved can be seen as ‘red’ or read as being
flaunted in face. That is the downside of identity-fixation and I am not even
sure if there’s an ‘up’ side to it.
It
doesn’t have to be identity either. The smart identity-abuser can dress
non-identity issues in ethnic and religious clothes. Bogeymen can be conjured
at will. You talk to representatives of either of the ‘aggrieved’ camps and
they would come up with excellent arguments to back their fears and objections.
One would think that the articulators are all unblemished on all counts and the
‘other’ they contend with are pretty odious creatures.
One
thing is clear. The law cannot differentiate among collectives. One thing is
clear: no group has the right to take the law into their hands. One thing is
clear. If you insult, you hurt and some among the hurt will be angry and of
those who are angry there will be some who will retire reason in favor of
passion. One thing is clear. It is easy to set fire to things it is a hundred
times more difficult to douse the flames. One thing is clear. Pyromaniacs love
each other.
The
true test of character and civic responsibility, however, is to desist from
making statements and asking questions that could provoke irritation (irritation
is spark, first spark; anger is fire). The true challenge is to sift message
from messenger, obtain word without letting its religious coloring blur vision.
The true responsibility is to ignore the obvious political motivation (it is
political, let us not be naïve here) and do what is prescribed in the
faith-texts of your choice.
I
am a Buddhist so I will speak as one. Buddhists,
since they are the most frequently vilified (we have seen ridiculous and utterly
pernicious blanket extrapolation to collective the act of a single or a few
individuals), if they feel ‘wronged’ (on account of sense of identity rather
than philosophical conviction, obviously), would do well to take refuge in the
twin notions relevant to all engagement: wisdom and compassion. They would do
well to reflect on the sathara agathi (the four pathways to
destruction), namely greed (lobha), hatred (dosa), delusion
(moha) and fear (bhaya) because they make the vast majority of
the population. For when a weak man is afflicted, only a small circle of people
are harmed, but when a leader is arrogant, delusional, hateful etc., nations can
perish.
No
one can prescribe ways of being to others. We can only self-prescribe. If we
are wise and compassionate, there’s less chance of causing harm. We are the
atoms that make the bomb. All of us. One explosion can take out the entire
nation. One can stop oneself, not anyone else.
*Malinda
Seneviratne is the Chief Editor of ‘The Nation and his articles can be found at www.malindawords.blogspot.com .