A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Wednesday, April 3, 2013
Sri Lanka Is ‘Sitting’ On Our Land: Tamil Eelam Occupied, Pillaged And Violated
Not so fast Kusal
Perera I would say. I can see Kusal wants to end the debate with
Diaspora Eelam Tamils and run away giving some clever excuse. I didn’t think he
was a coward. He did not take up my challenge on a ‘Federal’ constitution
either. I went beyond my official capacity in TGTE which is calling for an
‘international protection mechanism’ for the NorthEast people against systematic
and structural genocide;
which stands for the restoration of an Independent and Sovereign State of Tamil
Eelam (me included) and is engaged in collecting the ‘freedom demands’ of the
Tamil people living all over the globe and is set to promulgate the Tamil Eelam Freedom
Charter on May 18, 2013.
Is
that why Kusal doesn’t want to admit that the Sri Lanka is ‘sitting’ on our
land? Our land Tamil Eelam that continues to be occupied, pillaged and violated
even as we speak.
Yes
it is an intrusion; Sri Lanka is trespassing on our home land. And naturally
the Diaspora
Eelam Tamils, especially the outspoken lot can’t’ go home and live
there and assert their rights against a genocidal government; Despite the risks
some still go visit their home land, paying a visa fee if they overstay their
welcome beyond one month. They dare not utter a word and are forced to toe the
government line; if they don’t they would have to encounter harsh punishments
such as disappearance, torture and death by a terror squad allegedly headed by
the President’s
brother Gotabaya operating
the notorious ‘white van’ phenomenon or be transported to the
4th floor never to see their families again.
It’s
not funny that Kusal should say he doesn’t want to listen to the views of Diaspora
Tamils: “Sorry madam that counts absolutely nothing for me. I would
instead listen to anything a Tamil person in the Vanni has to say. Or to
anything a Tamil person still called a SL “refugee” in the Chengalpattu camp
would have to say on the issue of separation and their fate,” Kusal says but has
the audacity to impose his views on Tamil Nadu and the Indian people in an op-ed
in the Hindu. But in that article Kusal was careful to tone down his
rhetoric against Tamil Nadu students and was cautious not to call them “riffraff
and fringe groups,” otherwise he wouldn’t have been able to get it past print,
he is a shrewd operator.
No
one, not even the likes of Kusal can disenfranchise the Diaspora Eelam Tamils
like what Sinhala leaders did to disenfranchise Indian Ceylonese plantation
workers in 1949, “before the ink could dry,” on the 1947Soulbury
constitution that came into effect from independence in 1948. Nearly
a million of them were repatriated in order to deliberately and surreptitiously
reduce the voting strength of Tamils in Ceylon parliament, aimed at facilitating
the passage of legislation inimical to the interests of the Tamils.
These
workers were part of a generation who toiled for Ceylon so that even now Sri
Lanka can sell its tea and make money on cheap labor; its their blood sweat and
tears that have helped to establish Sri Lankan tea as the “best tea” in the
world, whilst these “modern day slaves” are still paid puny wages and have to
live under the worst inhumane living conditions including poor housing and
sanitary facilities (I lived in Norwood as a child and saw it all when my father
was EE, Norwood.) Although their leaders are sleeping with the government of
the day; they have achieved nothing for their people. Although flirting with
successive Sinhala governments, these leaders got ministerial posts but got
scraps for their people that haven’t helped to improve their lot one bit.
It’s
not funny that the Diaspora Eelam Tamils are anathema to Kusal and the likes of
him; that he would rather talk to the ‘enslaved of people’ of Vanni held captive
in a highly militarized zone with a soldier to civilian ration of 1:5; (Vavunyia
1:3) who are ruled by a former Sinhala military governor and no civilian
administration; a people crying out for a voice but don’t have one. With the
6th amendment in force he wants to hear their views on separation; as
though they would tell him and risk the dire consequences.
It’s
not funny that Kusal would want to talk to the people of Vanni when the Sri
Lankan military are interfering with their every day life and are continuing to
violate the human, civil, political, and democrat rights of the NorthEast
people. That they do not have the right to basic freedoms such as freedom of
speech and assembly and have to live in fear that they or their youth could be
arrested and taken under the dreaded PTA at any time.
It’s
not funny that Kusal would want to speak to them when Vanni women protesting the
disappearance of their children were not allowed to board a bus let alone
participate in a rally in Colombo; that Tamil women are being subject to rape,
forced prostitution and forced recruitment; that the people of Vanni want
justice and want the Sri Lankan government to end its impunity for still
unaccountable number of people after the war, that the Bishop
of Mannar suggested, based on authentic numbers, there were as many
as 146,679 persons missing. Actually Kusal should talk to His Worship, on Tamil
Nationhood. But no one in Tamil Eelam could express their true aspirations for a
free Tamil Eelam as long as they are occupied by an alien military and the
6th amendment is in force.
It’s
not funny that Kusal would want to talk to the people of Vanni when triumphalism
rules, when Vanni’s ‘Killing Fields’ have become a tourist site, built over the
remains of tens of thousands of innocent Vanni people complete with a Sinhala
war memorial whilst the people cannot grieve their dead and Tamil war memorials
have been desecrated to build army cantonments.
It’s
not funny that arable and residential private and state land are being used for
building more cantonments; that the army is into agriculture having taken over
180 hectares of arable land just in one location alone and is engaged in
corporatism; that Sinhala settlements are growing and Sinhalese are involved in
commercial, fishing and farming activities depriving the Vanni people of their
livelihood aimed at changing the demography of the traditional Tamil homeland.
That all development are military centered and not environmentally friendly,
promoting sustainable development and Tamil Eelam’s resources and land are sold
off to foreign governments and entities to line the pockets of the Rajapaksas
and keep them in power.
It’s
not funny that Kusal would want to talk to the people of Vanni when the IDPs are
still not re-housed, are forced away from coming back to their places of origin
and live in transit camps or with relatives.
It’s
not funny that Kusal would want to talk to the People of Vanni where the
Military governor speaks for the people of the Northern Province approving
the Divineguma
Bill satisfying a Supreme Court ruling that provincial councils had
to first agree and give their approval to cede their financial power over to the
President’s brother,Basil the
Minister of Economic Development; that for that ruling the Chief
Justice was impeached.
It’s
not funny Kusal would want to talk to the people of Vanni when a “people’s
meeting” convened by Tamil legislators of the TNA in Kilinochchi was stoned and
disrupted by “state
terrorists” ending in injuries to 14 persons: that it is already
happening when a provincial council election is expected according to UNHRC 22
resolution in September 2013.
It’s
not funny that Kusal would want to speak to: “Tamil person(s)” still called SL
“refugee(s)” in the Chengalpattu camp. If Kusal would only ask them, most would
say they want Eelam; because they actually protested along with TN students and
there are many u tube videos where they express their wish for Eelam.
So
asSri Lankais sitting on the land of the Tamils, while it is occupied, pillaged
and violated, Tamils feel that with the advent of the illegal 1972
constitution “that removed the safeguards provided by the Soulbury
Constitution (29/2) against the “tyranny of the majority”, Tamils have become
“free” again to choose their destiny. If Kusal but reads the comments made among
other by Mr. Kumar he would understand more about the shenanigans behind the
adoption of the ’72 constitution.
It
would be most appropriate to conclude by quoting from the Tamil Nation website
which explains the “resuscitation of Tamil sovereignty” after the advent of the
’72 constitution that was, “never ceded to any conqueror”:
“The proponents of Tamil Eelam argue that the Northern and Eastern
Provinces of Sri Lanka coincide with the historic boundaries of the kingdom of
Jaffna and argue a case that seeks to establish that sovereignty over these
territories was never ceded to any conqueror and that, even if such concession
had been made at any time in the past, the unilateral renunciation of links with
the United Kingdom which took place at the assumption of office by the
government of Mrs. Srimavo Bandaranaike in 1972 resuscitated the Tamil sovereignty which had merely laid dormant until then… In
the abstract theory of international law, it would appear that the Tamils have
at the very least, an arguable case, and possibly a sustainable one.” -
Timothy J. Moore, M.P. of the Australian Section of the ICJ in his Report on
‘Ethnic Violence, the Independence of the Judiciary, Protection of Fundamental
Rights and the Rule of Law in Sri Lanka – Fragile Freedoms?’, July 1983 –
Tam
*Usha
S Sri-Skanda- Rajah, Chair, TGTE Senate