A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, May 30, 2013
The Land Of The Indifferent
“That girls are raped, that two boys knife a third, Were axioms to him, who’d never heard. Of any world where promises were kept, Or one could weep because another wept” - Auden (The Shield of Achilles)
The Lankan crisis is a multi-dimensional one. There is the political
crisis which encompasses the crisis of democracy and the crisis of
peace-and-nation-building. There is the economic crisis.
There is also a psychological crisis, a moral-ethical crisis, a crisis
of values. This societal affliction was cast into sharp relief by two
incidents which happened during the Wesak season.
The callous manner in which several doctors and nurses in the General Hospital treateda seriously injured patient has received a fair degree of publicity thanks to the efforts ofSeylina D Peiris,
the Good Samaritan who took the young woman to the hospital and
witnessed the pageant of indifference first hand. This incident cannot
be pigeon-holed as typical of the state sector, because similar horror
stories have emerged from private hospitals as well, the most recent
being the death of a young child at Nawaloka[i].
Nor is this problem limited to hospitals. It is present in every
possible space, public and private, political and non-political.
In today’s Sri Lanka, a militarised value system ensures that weakness
is scorned, strength worshipped and victims ignored. This is augmented
by religious brands which enthrone empty piety in place of real
kindness.
The state Wesak Festival was held in Buttala, under the patronage of President Mahinda Rajapaksa.
A few days previously, the local authorities poisoned 38 homeless dogs
in the area to prevent them from disturbing the Wesak celebration. Can
anything encapsulate the damning hypocrisy and the vacuous exhibitionism
which pass off as Buddhism today than this act? Killing living beings
in the name of celebrating the Birth, Enlightenment and the Final
Extinguishing of a teacher who placed compassion to all living beings at
the forefront of his teaching: is this what Buddhism is becoming in Sri
Lanka?
This week 35 families in Dambulla were
given 24 hours by the local authorities to vacate their homes of more
than 3 decades. That callous order was made supposedly in furtherance of
developing Dambulla as a Sacred City. As illegal occupants of state
lands, these families may not be entitled to any compensation; but as
human beings and as citizens, they are entitled to some sympathetic
consideration. Rendering men, women and children homeless and destitute
to protect a temple does not accord with the teachings of the Buddha.
According to another media report, 13 islands in Kalpitiya have been
sold to foreigners. This will deprive thousands of people of their homes
and their livelihoods. But this tragedy too will pass us by.
This is what happens to a country when pity dies.
When Pity dies
In October 2009, a man started throwing stones at passing vehicles in Bambalapitiya.
We all know, instinctively, that no sane man would throw stones at
passing vehicles; that a man who does so is indubitably an insane one.
The normal, ordinary, civilised reaction would be to restrain such a man
and ensure that he gets some medical attention.
But in Bambalapitiya, on that day, monsters reigned. A mob consisting of
policemen and civilians started chasing the stone-thrower. When he
waded into the sea to escape from his demented pursuers, two policemen
waded in after him and started beating him with stout poles. The footage
shows the victim begging for mercy, but his attackers, immeasurably
more unhinged than him, had none to give[ii]. In the end, he waded ever deeper into the sea in order to escape the savagery, and drowned.
Having caused a man’s death and watched him die, the two attackers and
the more than 100 spectators returned to their momentarily interrupted
ordinary lives.
Initially the police claimed that the victim died of drowning. But a
cameraman from a private TV station had videoed the tableau of
inhumanity. It was after the footage was made public that the police
admitted that a crime was committed.
Eventually it was discovered that the victim was indeed a mental patient.
That grisly incident, and the moral depravity and lawlessness it
embodied, was a forewarning of the rapid de-sensitisation and
brutalisation of Sri Lanka.
In commenting on the Holocaust, Hannah Arendt said, “The deeds were monstrous but the doer…quite ordinary, commonplace”[iii]. Clearly her observation has a relevance far beyond that time and that place:
The men and women who watched passively as a defenceless man was beaten
and forced to drown, the doctors and the nurses who ignored the plight
of a patient (and watched television amidst the Wesak decorations
honouring the Compassionate One) are not monsters; they are perfectly
ordinary people, and in all probability, good family men and women in
their private lives.
What does this say about our future?
Sri Lanka has had her share of times when ordinary virtues which
underpin a liveable life such as decency, sympathy and kindness were in
abeyance. The Black July, in which the killers were ordinary people
rather than soldiers, militants or even terrorists, was an ideal case in
point. That was a time when crime became the norm and legality the
exception, when deeds of brutality were committed in the wide open, with
pride – often to the acclaim/approbation of onlookers – while acts of
mercy, of ordinary humanity were carried out in stealth. What made that
horror even more appalling was the way it continued, day after day –
every morning mobs would come out to burn, pillage and kill; every
evening the constituent individuals would go home to their families, and
to a few hours of normal existence; the same surreal process would be
repeated the next day.
But until recently such descents into savage amorality were incidental
and episodic; they flared up, lasted for a while, and died.
Today the germs have infused every fibre of Lankan society. Today no
corner ofSri Lanka, no aspect of Lankan life is immune to the disease.
The culprits are not just politicians, though they too bear their share
of blame in setting this devastating trend, especially by enthroning
impunity in the name of patriotism. Religion, as it is institutionally
practiced in Sri Lanka, is a part of the problem. It will build
magnificent edifices while helping to create people devoid of basic
human decencies.
The self-immolation by a Buddhist monk has merely added another layer of
deadly violence to a society already choking on violence.
In the past, after atrocities happened, there would be some shame and
guilt, and perhaps even some soul-searching. But that necessary,
civilising practice died with the Humanitarian Operation and the Welfare
Camps. Not only did we shut our hearts to natural human pity during the
war and in its immediate aftermath. Four years later, we still have no
pity to give; nor see a need for it.
Pitilessness is habit-forming; now it’s devouring our own.
The Rajapaksas can be ejected, democratically, someday. The political
and economic crises can be resolved, to some extent, in a post-Rajapaksa
Sri Lanka. But curing Lankan society of the plague of
ruthless-indifference will be far more difficult, if not impossible.
[iii] Eichmann in Jerusalem: A Report of the Banality of Evil