A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Sunday, June 2, 2013
Global Overview 2012: People internally displaced by conflict and violence - Sri Lanka
Hundreds of thousands of current and former IDPs in Sri Lanka remained
in need of protection and assistance as of the end of 2012, more than
three and a half years after government forces defeated the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) in May 2009. More than 93,000 people were
still living in camps, with host communities or in transit situations.
Of more than 480,000 people who had returned to Northern and Eastern
provinces, many are still to achieve durable solutions.
At the end of September 2012, the Menik Farm displacement camp, where
around 225,000 Tamil IDPs were interned in June 2009, was closed. Of
more than 1,300 IDPs still living in the camp in September, 560 were
unable to return to their home areas because they were occupied by the
Mullaitivu Security Force headquarters. Instead they were relocated,
many of them against their will.
Military occupation of land is preventing around 26,000 people from
returning across the north and east of Sri Lanka, and it is estimated
that more than 3,000 people have been relocated, in many cases
involuntarily.
Many returnees faced challenges in accessing their basic humanitarian
needs such as shelter, water and sanitation during 2012. Displaced and
returning communities also required livelihood assistance, social
support, legal assistance and psycho-social care in recovering from the
effects of the conflict. The assistance provided was inadequate to meet
the needs. The presence of landmines and unexploded ordnance also
continued to complicate the recovery of livelihoods. As of the end of
the year, clearance operations were ongoing in both livelihood and
residential areas, with 108 km2 of land still in need of demining.
In December 2011 the government's Lessons Learnt and Reconciliation
Commission recommended a reduction of the military presence and the
demilitarisation of the administration. A year later, however, the
number of troops in Northern province was still high, and the military
continued to compete economically with small businesses run by
conflict-affected people who were trying to become independent of aid.
It also reportedly cultivated crops on land which IDPs had been told
they could not return to.
The military continued to engage in activities that fall within the
remit of a civil administration, including the authorisation of
community meetings or events, and the registration of civilian families
in many northern villages, whether they had been displaced or not.
Female-headed households reported feeling particularly insecure as a
result of military visits. Protracted Tamil IDPs in the Northern
Province and in Trincomalee have been unable to return to land that the
military is occupying, and to date they have received no support towards
a durable solution.
Land issues, which were at the core of the conflict, remained unresolved
as of the end of 2012. No policy had been established to address the
many and complex housing, land and property issues caused by multiple
and protracted displacement. This has prevented many IDPs from achieving
durable solutions.
Although they have registered as having returned to the north, many
Northern Muslim IDPs continued to live in their places of displacement
in Puttalam or between the two locations, the result on the one hand of
there being no assistance to support returns and on the other of
obstacles to local integration.
Sri Lanka still has no legislation governing IDPs' protection. A bill
drafted by the National Human Rights Commission of Sri Lanka in 2008 had
not been taken forward as of December 2012. The development of a policy
and/or legislation on displacement is part of the government's action
plan on the protection and promotion of human rights for 2011 to 2016,
but the timeframe for its completion had not been met and no information
as to progress was available.
The national budget prioritised defence over the ministries responsible
for dealing with recovery from the war, and large-scale infrastructure
projects were favoured over measures that might address the assistance
needs of IDPs and returnees.
The military leadership continued to control the approval of
humanitarian projects in the north through its membership in the
Presidential Task Force for Resettlement, Development and Security in
the Northern Province (PTF). The PTF places particular restrictions on
the provision of mental health care and psycho-social activities.
Because of government restrictions, no comprehensive assessment has been
conducted in conflict-affected areas, and there is no comprehensive
data on the needs of the most vulnerable groups. No IDP profiling has
been done since 2007. The government, UNHCR and the UN Office for
Project Services launched a survey of protracted IDPs in 2011, but the
project was abandoned in December 2012 due to obstacles placed on it by
the PTF.
At the end of the year, the UN cluster system was phased out as the
international response shifted from humanitarian to development
interventions, despite continuing humanitarian needs on the ground.
International funding for both areas of activity was significantly
reduced.