A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Monday, July 29, 2013
The hope of change in the type of politics that might be practiced in
the country was short lived. The TNA’s nomination of former Supreme
Court Justice C. V. Wigneswaran to be its chief ministerial candidate
for the Northern Provincial Council upgraded the quality of those
contesting the provincial elections. As a person who had earned his
reputation as a professional and a judge, his nomination was also seen
as having the potential to upgrade the standard of politics in the
country. There was some hope that other political parties would also
follow suit and nominate those who had shown that they put the interests
of the larger society before their own. But it was not to be.
Politics at the present time is too much about attaining and retaining
personal power, and too little about looking at the best interests of
the larger community.
The crossover of articulate UNP Parliamentarian Dayasiri Jayasekera to
the government ranks has emphasized how politics in the country is about
personal power and being part of the power structure. In justifying his
crossover in his farewell speech in Parliament the chief ministerial
aspirant blamed his former party leaders of taking no effective action
to oppose the passage of the 18th Amendment to the Constitution, the
impeachment of the former Chief Justice and the electricity price hike.
He expressed his disappointment that his former party leadership did
not effectively oppose the government. But he joined this very
government when it offered him a position. Unless there is more to the
agreement he has with the government that took him in, it looks like he
will only seek to strengthen the government to continue on its path
without changing course.
Accompanying the UNP Parliamentarian in his defection are several local
level members of the opposition. This will almost certainly guarantee
yet another electoral defeat for the opposition and will further reduce
the institutional checks and balances on the power of the government.
It will also increase the pressure on the Opposition and UNP leader
Ranil Wickremesinghe to revamp his party structure. It will lead to
calls to him to consider the greater good of his party, and of the
country, rather than continue to lead the opposition in the present
manner. The most recent defections, which will further weaken the
opposition, are a continuation of a process that has been debilitating
the main opposition party during most of the past two decades.
There is a tendency to blame the UNP leadership and its internal divisions and weaknesses for the sins of the government.
There is a tendency to blame the UNP leadership and its internal divisions and weaknesses for the sins of the government.
ut the criticism of the opposition leadership for its ineffectiveness
needs to be accompanied in equal if not greater measure by public
pressure on the government to practice good governance rather than
engage in misgovernance as at present. It is the government that has
the levers of military and economic power under its control, and not the
Opposition. It must use its powers in the interests of the larger
society and not of itself or its supporters only. This recalls the
timeless advice of Arahat Mahinda to King Devanampiyatissa over two
millennia ago when he said that the king was not owner of the land and
its inhabitants, but only the trustee.
That this type of thinking is still being talked about at the more
intellectual levels of civil society is a reason to be optimistic and
not pessimistic about the future. This was indeed the thought that
emerged at a symposium on Religion and Reconciliation organized by the
Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute of International Relations where the
keynote speaker was the founder of the Sarvodaya Movement, Dr A. T.
Ariyaratne, and other speakers included senior Buddhist monks, Ven. Dr
Bellanwila Wimalaratana and Ven. Galkande Dhammananda, and leaders of
other religions, Kurukkal Babu Sharma, Fr Benedict Joseph and A. M. N.
Ameen.
Although the Lakshman Kadirgamar Institute is a government-controlled
one under Foreign Ministry auspices, those who attended the symposium
showed a much greater liberality and universality of spirit than is
presently visible in the government. Both the speakers and the audience
upheld the importance of universal values for the betterment of the
country. One of the monks said that he saw the country heading towards
renewed conflict, and we would have no one to blame but the present
generation. If the thirty year war that ended in 2009 could have been
blamed on the previous generation, the coming conflict will be due to
the misgovernance of the present generation, and all who sanction the
absence of morality in politics, he said.
Another notable feature at the symposium was the dissent of youth. When
a representative of an extremist religious group tried to criticize the
liberality of the main speakers at the event, he was immediately
challenged by the youth present in the audience. This echoed another
event that took place a week earlier where the opposition leadership was
itself challenged and was unable to come up with an adequate response.
The growing impatience of the youth with the older generation of
leaders is one sign of change. The duty of politicians who aspire to be
elected to office, or hold it, is to lead the country as a whole to a
better future, not to cater to only a section of the people in order to
secure themselves in the seats of power, whether in government or
opposition.