A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Thursday, November 28, 2013
International And Legal Implications Of Weli Oya And Its Aftermath
The
Rise and Fall of the Tamil Militancy and the International Legal
Implications of the Government’s Counter-Insurgency – Part 4
In late 1984, India, which was helping the Tamil militant groups, was in
a position to bring the conflict to an end, had the Sri Lankan
Government come up with an adequate political arrangement. But the
Government was still talking about cosmetic variations on the District
Development Councils of 1981, which had been thoroughly discredited by
its intemperate actions at their very birth. Moreover, India was far
from hostile to Sinhalese interests. Only, the wisdom to deal with India
advantageously was lacking. Mr. R. Sampanthan recalls Mrs. Indira Gandhi telling the TULF leaders, “I will help the Tamils, but I will not harm the Sinhalese.”
By escalating the conflict instead with projects like ‘Weli Oya’,
which quickly led to mass killing, the Government was inadvertently
moving the ethnic conflict into a legal status, which it badly wanted to
avoid. There are two Protocols of 10th June 1977 additional to the
Geneva Conventions of 12th August 1949. Protocol II relates to
Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts, such as
‘which take place in the territory of a High Contracting Party (i.e. the
Sri Lankan State) between its armed forces and dissident armed forces
or other organised armed groups,…which exercise control over part of its
territory…’ It forbids collective punishment, acts of terrorism and
reprisals.
Article 17 of Protocol II stipulates in
Paragraph 2 that ‘civilians shall not be compelled to leave their own
territory for reasons connected with the conflict’. Paragraph 1 allows
for ‘displacement’ with satisfactory relief measures only when the
security of the civilians is involved or for ‘imperative military
reasons’. Such displacement must of necessity be temporary. It certainly
does not allow for the forced evacuation of civilians in order to
introduce those of a different ethnicity. Read More
From Rajan Hoole‘s “Sri Lanka: Arrogance of Power - Myth, Decadence and Murder”. Thanks to Rajan for giving us permission to republish. To read earlier parts click here