Raising questions about the effectiveness of the visit by UK Prime
Minister David Cameron to Sri Lanka, India said that such energetic
moves may not work in ‘South Asian context’ and instead could be
‘counterproductive’.
“It is not our style to do what he did,” said a highly-placed source on
Thursday, when questioned about the much-reported remarks and travels of
David Cameron to Colombo and Jaffna.
It was questionable, indicated the source, whether Cameron’s statements
would make any difference in persuading Colombo to make a vigorous
probe into human rights violations by security forces or in devolution
of power.
Obliquely criticising the UK Prime Minister, the source asserted, “You
can ask what is more effective in the South Asian context,” adding that
such actions can be ‘counterproductive’.
It was emphasised that when India ‘makes a point’, it may be missed by outside observers but its interlocutors understand it.
While MEA had wanted Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to visit
CHOGM, the source said that Prime Minister not going is not a reflection
on strength of bilateral relations.
When asked if there was too much importance given to regional sentiment,
the source countered, “tell me one country where foreign policy is not
shaped by domestic policy -- not a single country where domestic
imperatives matter”.
On whether India lost leverage over Sri Lanka by Singh not attending CHOGM, it was pointed that there were ‘levers and levers’.
“A lot of them are just at the process of engagement. The very fact that
External Affairs Minister did go to Colombo despite protests is
appreciated there (in Colombo),” said the source.
Despite the looming shadow of China, it was pointed out that geography
kept both countries talking to each other. “In same way, India cannot
wish away Sri Lanka, Sri Lanka can’t wish away India,” the source said.
