A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
A Brief Colonial History Of Ceylon(SriLanka)
Sri Lanka: One Island Two Nations
(Full Story)
Search This Blog
Back to 500BC.
==========================
Thiranjala Weerasinghe sj.- One Island Two Nations
?????????????????????????????????????????????????Tuesday, December 31, 2013
On Foreign Investments And Exports: Is It the Therapy For Sri Lanka’s Underdevelopment? – III
Calibration of the Industrial Structure to enable the Absorption of Spatially Immobile Rural Labour Surplus
The structure of labour supply discussed in section II in the context of
the Sri Lankan economy was also largely the inner dynamic of the
organisation of labour, shared by the three model economies under
review; namely Japan, South Korea and Taiwan. The strategy adopted by
these economies to absorb the spatially immobile rural labour surplus to
manufacturing industry was to expand small scale industries in rural
areas through a system of subcontracting with vertical inter-firm
linkages making it possible for a smooth transfer of labour from
agriculture to industry without a geographical shift in the labour
force. This exceptional technique adopted by the East Asian states to
transfer rural labour surplus from agriculture to industry solved the
problem of sectoral and geographical immobility of rural labour and was
achieved without a fall in the output of agriculture (see Ranis and Fei,
Japanese Agricultural Development’, 1967). The process was mediated by
establishing subcontracting linkages between large-scale firms situated
in towns engaged in capital intensive assembly work and SMEs based in
rural areas absorbing the labour surplus of agriculture to produce the
component parts required by the large-scale enterprises. The production
of the component parts in the lights of automotive parts and components,
machinery, electrical equipment, computers, computer parts and
accessories, metalworking was farmed out to a rural network of small and
medium scale industries by the large scale assembly firms situated in
the towns.
The central phenomenon to be noted in this regard is that the production
of advanced, semi-advanced and simple component parts under the small
scale production framework was made possible by the breaking up of the
production process of a particular product into multitude of simpler
production processes. This is quite the antithetical form of factor
organisation in relation to the centralized industrial networks found in
advanced Western economies. This means to say that the key
organisational feature in East Asian industrial development is that the
production of a particular good was divided into multitude of products
and into mutually independent production process to simplify the
production process. This on one hand allowed the production of advanced
parts and components based on the small and medium scale organisation of
the production network and on the other hand, enabled the transfer of
rural labour surplus that is spatially immobile, from agriculture to
industry. This further division of the production process of a
particular component part into several production processes
hence, enabled the penetration of industrial production into rural
areas. It enabled the production to be carried out based on small scale
production units, which in turn made it possible to absorb the rural
labour surplus that was spatially immobile and geographically dispersed
in an uneven manner within the rural limits. The spatial immobility of
the rural labour surplus is stemming from the particular nature of
labour deployment in East Asia’s predominantly paddy based agriculture,
as discussed earlier in section II with respect to Sri Lanka.